Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

0.54s

  • State v. Vawter

    33 N.C. App. 131 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 1977

    Defendant strongly relies on State v. Brown, 263 N.C. 786 , 140 S.E. 2d 413 (1965). … We think Miller and Brown are distinguishable from the case at hand.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Statesville Medical Group, P.A. v. Dickey

    106 N.C. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1992

    In Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic v. Petrozza, 92 N.C. … Id. at 24-25, 373 S.E.2d at 451 (citing Investors, Inc. v. Berry, 293 N.C. 688, 701 , 239 S.E.2d 566, 574 (1977)).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kaczala v. Richardson

    18 N.C. App. 446 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1973

    In Jones v. … In McGinnis v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sawyer v. Carter

    71 N.C. App. 556 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1984

    Brown v. N.C. Wesleyan College, 65 N.C. App. 579 , 309 S.E. 2d 701 (1983). We see no reason to forbid a cause of action against an owner of a “convenience” or “package” store. … See Best v. Perry, 41 N.C. App. 107, 110 , 254 S.E. 2d 281, 283 (1979). The evidence resembles that of Brown v. N. C.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Hochheiser v. North CaroLina Department of Transportation

    82 N.C. App. 712 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1986

    G.S. 143B-346; Equipment Co. v. Hertz Corp. and Contractors, Inc. v. Hertz Corp., 256 N.C. 277 , 123 S.E. 2d 802 (1962). … See Guyton v. Board of Transportation, 30 N.C. App. 87 , 226 S.E. 2d 175 (1976).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Albrecht v. Dorsett

    131 N.C. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1998

    Smith v. Smith, 43 N.C. App. 338 , 258 S.E.2d 833 (1979). … R 10(d) (setting forth the scope of review on appeal); Brown v. Brown, 112 N.C.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bryan v. Raynor

    94 N.C. App. 91 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1989

    App. 544 , 236 S.E. 2d 283 ; see also Capps v. City of Raleigh, 35 N.C. App. 290 , 241 S.E. 2d 527 (1978). … In Heaton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Andrews v. Taylor

    34 N.C. App. 706 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1977

    Adams v. Enka Corp., 202 N.C. 767 , 164 S.E. 367 (1932); see Murrell v. Handley, 245 N.C. 559 , 96 S.E. 2d 717 (1957). … Hood v. Coach Co., supra; Dunn v. Bomberger, 213 N.C. 172 , 195 S.E. 364 (1938); Haddock v. Lassiter, 8 N.C. App. 243 , 174 S.E. 2d 50 (1970).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Development Assoc. v. WAKE CTY. BD. OF ADJ.

    48 N.C. App. 541 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 1980

    App. 541 DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner, v. The WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: James R. Fullwood, Chairman; Billy G. Hinton; Russell Buxton; John E. Tantum; Ralph E. Smith; J. H. … Duys & Co. v. Tone, 125 Conn. 300 , 5 A.2d 23 ; Bucher v. American Fruit Growers Co., 107 Pa.Super. 399 , 163 A. 33 ; see generally 3 C.J.S. Agriculture § 2. 286 N.C. at 159-160 , 209 S.E.2d at 474 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re the Appeal of Mount Shepherd Methodist Camp

    120 N.C. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1995

    Randolph County (the County), appeals from an order entered 17 June 1994 by the Property Tax Commission (the Commission), which modified the decision of the Randolph County Board of Equalization and Review (the Board). … The Board found that only 21.1 acres was exempt property. Pursuant to N.C. Gen.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Rodgers

    161 N.C. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 18, 2003

    Brown #1686. The driver of the vehicle known as Shorty along with the other occupant then gave Officer Brown consent to search their persons and the vehicle they occupied. … See State v. Arrington, 311 N.C. 633 ; 319 S.E.2d 254 (1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Devega

    808 S.E.2d 926 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 16, 2018

    In State v. … Defendant cites State v. Lang and State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re SM

    190 N.C. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 2008

    The Court first discussed State v. … For example, in In re Brown, the juvenile respondent was reprimanded for talking during a test.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vaughn v. Vaughn

    99 N.C. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1990

    Sink v. Easter, 288 N.C. 183, 198 , 217 S.E.2d 532, 541 (1975). … Allred v. Tucci, 85 N.C. App. 138, 142 , 354 S.E.2d 291, 294 , disc. rev. denied, 320 N.C. 166 , 358 S.E.2d 47 (1987) (citations omitted).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Farmer v. Troy Univ.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 2021

    ¶6 On 13 May 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States filed its opinion in Franchise Tax Board of California v. … The Board audited Hyatt, who later “sued the Board in Nevada state court for torts he alleged the agency committed during the audit.” Id. at ___, 203 L. Ed. 2d at 773.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Advertising Co. v. Bradshaw, SEC. of Transp.

    48 N.C. App. 10 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1980

    In Orange County v. Board of Transportation, 46 N.C. … See, Days Inn of America, Inc. v. Board of Transportation, 24 N.C. App. 636 , 211 S.E. 2d 864 (1975); Bracey Advertising Company, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, 35 N.C.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Jackson

    4 N.C. App. 153 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1969

    In King v. … However, plaintiff stated that he did not see this brown bag again. This evidence is not sufficient to compel a nonsuit on the ground of Atwood v. Holland, supra; Bank v. Lindsey, supra; and Davis v. Rigsby, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Blakeley v. The Town of Taylortown

    233 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2014

    On 7 March -5- 2007, the Board met again to consider a resolution to terminate plaintiff’s employment. … By a vote of 3 to 2, the Board voted to terminate plaintiff. Five days later, the Board voted again and voted 5 to 0 in favor of termination.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State Bd. of Exam'rs of Plumbing

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 2025

    COA24-136 Filed 21 May 2025 Burke County, Nos. 01CVS000952-110, 23CRS000703-110 STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PLUMBING HEATING AND FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTORS, Plaintiff, v. … To address this problem, Defendant “repaired a 12-inch section of duct board that was soaked from water.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yates v. J. W. Campbell Electrical Corp.

    95 N.C. App. 354 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1989

    Rappaport v. Days Inn, 296 N.C. 382 , 250 S.E.2d 245 (1979); Hood v. Coach Co., 249 N.C. 534 , 107 S.E.2d 154 (1959). Mazzacco v. Purcell, 303 N.C. 493, 497 , 279 S.E.2d 583, 586-87 (1981) (emphasis in original). … Hood v. Coach Co., 249 N.C. 534 , 107 S.E.2d 154 (1959); Andrews v. Taylor, 34 N.C. App. 706 , 239 S.E.2d 630 (1977).

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.