Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,157 results
2.65s
107 N.C. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1992
In re Brown, 23 N.C. App. 109 , 208 S.E.2d 282 (1974); see Hayes v. Evergo Telephone Co., 100 N.C. App. 474 , 397 S.E.2d 325 (1990). A judgment, if proper on its face, is not void. Drummond v. Cordell, 73 N.C. … Town of Sylva v. Gibson, 51 N.C. App. 545 , 277 S.E.2d 115 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 303 N.C. 319 , 281 S.E.2d 659 (1981). See also Chicopee, Inc. v. Sims Metal Works, Inc., 98 N.C.
Cited 29 timesPublishedDevelopment Assoc. v. WAKE CTY. BD. OF ADJ.
48 N.C. App. 541 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 1980
App. 541 DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner, v. The WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: James R. Fullwood, Chairman; Billy G. Hinton; Russell Buxton; John E. Tantum; Ralph E. Smith; J. H. … Duys & Co. v. Tone, 125 Conn. 300 , 5 A.2d 23 ; Bucher v. American Fruit Growers Co., 107 Pa.Super. 399 , 163 A. 33 ; see generally 3 C.J.S. Agriculture § 2. 286 N.C. at 159-160 , 209 S.E.2d at 474 .
Cited 0 timesPublished86 N.C. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1987
Hicks v. Brown Shoe Co., 64 N.C. App. 144 , 306 S.E. 2d 543 (1983), disc. rev. denied, 311 N.C. 304 , 317 S.E. 2d 680 (1984). The award *230 was entered prior to the effective date of G.S. 97-86.2.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGraham Court Associates v. Town Council of Town of Chapel Hill
53 N.C. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 1981
Beers v. Board of Adjustment of Township of Wayne, 75 N.J. Super. 305 , 183 A. 2d 130 ; Bridge Park Co. v. Borough of Highland Park, 113 N.J. Super. 219 , 273 A. 2d 397 ; Maplewood Village Tenants Ass’n. v. … Kaufman & Board v. W. Whiteland Sup., 20 Pa. Commonwealth, 116, 340 A. 2d 909 (1975); Dublin Properties v. Upper Dublin Twp., 21 Pa.
Cited 11 timesPublishedStone v. Paradise Park Homes, Inc.
37 N.C. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1978
In Hartley v. … Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485 , 141 S.E. 2d 875 (1965). In the case sub judice, the jurors apparently believed that total damages amounted to $16,000, but that only $3,500 was allocable to damage due to settlement.
Cited 16 timesPublishedPeele v. WILSON COUNTY BD. OF EDUCATION
289 S.E.2d 890 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1982
Morris, and Gretchen Peele Whitaker and husband, Merle Whitaker v. WILSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and W. E. Edwards. No. 817SC680. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 6, 1982. *892 Kirby & Clark by J. … This contention was considered in College v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 12, 2023
As a result, Judge McGee would have denied the Board’s motion under this more stringent standard. See Stephenson v. … In urging us to read this history differently, the Board relies principally on University v. Foy, 5 N.C. 58 (1804).
Cited 0 timesPublished191 N.C. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2008
The only person present when the search warrant was executed was Everette *88 Franklin Brown. Because Mr. Brown was the only individual present, the officers read the warrant to him. … Brown may have actually resided in defendant’s place of business in a separate room.
Cited 12 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Easley v. Philip Morris Inc.
144 N.C. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 2001
Todd Brown, Charlotte, for defendant-appellees Philip Morris Incorporated, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation (individually and as successor by merger to The American Tobacco *782 Company), Lorillard Tobacco Company, … Riviere v. Riviere, 134 N.C.App. 302, 306 , 517 S.E.2d 673, 676 (1999) (citing White v. White, 312 N.C. 770 , 324 S.E.2d 829 (1985)).
Cited 7 timesPublished201 N.C. App. 572 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 22, 2009
State v. Green, — N.C. App. —, —, 670 S.E.2d 635, 637 , aff’d per curiam,-N.C.-,-S.E.2d-, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 895 (2009) (citation omitted). … State v. Collins, 160 N.C. App. 310, 315 , 585 S.E.2d 481, 485 (2003) (internal citations and quotations omitted).
Cited 1 timesPublished68 N.C. App. 452 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1984
See G.S. 29-2; e.g., Brown v. Brown, 168 N.C. 4 , 84 S.E. 25 (1915). See generally, 28 Am. Jur. 2d Estates § 57 (1966); 31 C.J.S. Estates §§ 30-33 (1964); 5 N.C. … Hice v. Hi-Mil, supra. Defendants next argue that the evidence does not support the findings and that the findings do not support the conclusions of law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Appeal of Philip Morris U.S.A.
130 N.C. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 1999
On 21 November 1994, the Cabarrus County Board of Equalization and Review (County Board) fixed the value of the subject real property, as of 1 January 1994, at $302,122,140. … Electric Membership Corp. v. Alexander, 282 N.C. 402, 409 , 192 S.E.2d 811, 816 (1972).
Cited 1 timesPublishedN.C. Dep't of Envtl. Quality v. Wake Stone Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 2025
In Carolina Marina v. New Hanover County Board of Commissioners, 207 N.C. App. 250 (2010), the superior court reversed a Board of Commissioner’s decision to deny the plaintiff a special use permit. Id. at 251. … While that appeal was pending, the Board voluntarily granted the permit to the plaintiff pursuant to the superior court’s order. Id. at 252.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2023
State v. Brown, 110 N.C. App. 658, 659, 430 S.E.2d 433, 434 (1993) (citation omitted). … (quoting State v. Brown, 110 N.C. App. 658, 659, 430 S.E.2d 433, 434 (1993)). While Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished258 N.C. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 20, 2018
For example, in Brown v. Am. … Unlike the response at issue in Brown , where a letter was construed to constitute an answer, the shortcomings in Defendant's motion are substantive, not technical. See Brown , 129 N.C.App. at 213 , 498 S.E.2d at 388 .
Cited 1 timesPublished57 N.C. App. 25 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 1982
Sweatt v. Board of Education, 237 N.C. 653, 657 , 75 S.E. 2d 738, 742 (1953). Whether an injury occurs in the course of the employment depends upon the time, place and circumstances of the accident. Bartlett v. … See Massey v. Board of Education, supra.
Reversed by Powers v. Lady's Funeral Home, 306 N.C. 728 (1982)Cited 4 timesPublished144 N.C. App. 119 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2001
App. at 171, 527 S.E.2d at 89 (quoting Meyer v. Walls, 347 N.C. 97, 110 , 489 S.E.2d 880, 887 (1997) (quoting Anita Brown-Graham and Jeffrey S. … Mullis v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedJohnson v. City of Winston-Salem
15 N.C. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1972
Relying upon Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E. 2d 900 (1942); Perry v. High Point, 218 N.C. 714 , 12 S.E. 2d 275 (1940); Graham v. … In Borst v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPiedmont Bank and Trust Co. v. Stevenson
79 N.C. App. 236 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1986
High Point City Board of Education, 33 N.C. … Davis, J., in Cumming v. Barbour, 99 N.C., 332 . See also Root, supra; Silver v. Board of Transportation, 47 N.C. App. 261 , 267 S.E. 2d 49 (1980).
Cited 34 timesPublishedDobrowolska Ex Rel. Dobrowolska v. Wall
138 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 16, 2000
The ordinance gives the power to the board of aldermen at their pleasure to grant one person a license and refuse another under the same circumstances. . . . … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 496 , 97 L. Ed. 469, 609 (1953). Under Meads v. N.C.
Cited 34 timesPublished
Ask Donna