Case law

Coffey v. Town of Waynesville

143 N.C. App. 624 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2001

Its role is similar to that of a municipal board deciding whether to grant or deny a conditional use permit under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-381(a), See Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. … Act-Up Triangle v. Comm’n for Health Servs., 345 N.C. 699 , 483 S.E.2d 388 (1997).

Lucas v. Lucas

209 N.C. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2011

See Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C. App. 264, 266-67 , 276 S.E.2d 718, 722 (1981) (“The order appealed from in the case subjudice does not state that the judge found no just cause for delay. … See Vadala v. Vadala, 145 N.C.

Burnette v. City of Goldsboro

188 N.C. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008

Everett, Womble, Lawrence & Brown, L.L.P., by W. Harrell Everett, Jr. and Darrell K. Brown, for respondent-appellee. BRYANT, Judge. William R. … Humphries v. Jacksonville, 300 N.C. 186 , 265 S.E.2d 189 (1980). Once we have reviewed the trial court's findings we review the trial court's conclusions of law de novo. Brown v. City of Winston-Salem, 176 N.C.

Chesnutt v. Peters

44 N.C. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1980

The application of the whole record test is discussed by Justice Copeland in Thompson v. … Ormond v. Garrett, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 8 N.C. App. 662 , 175 S.E. 2d 371 (1970), 38 A.L.R. 3d 448 (1971).

Johnson v. City of Winston-Salem

15 N.C. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1972

Relying upon Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E. 2d 900 (1942); Perry v. High Point, 218 N.C. 714 , 12 S.E. 2d 275 (1940); Graham v. … In Borst v.

Smith v. Dean

2 N.C. App. 553 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1968

Hardison v. Gregory, supra; Sutton v. Wells, 175 N.C. 1 , 94 S.E. 688 ; McCall v. Wilson, 101 N.C. 598 , 8 S.E. 225 . … Bane v. R. R., 171 N.C. 328 , 88 S.E., 477 ; White v. Hines, 182 N.C., 275 , 109 S.E., 31 ; S. v. Matthews, 191 N.C., 378 , 131 S.E., 743 ; S. v. Stanley, supra.

Brinegar v. THE CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM

195 N.C. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2009

The Medical Review Board usually took between two weeks and two months to make this kind of determination. … (citing Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 33 L.

Clark v. Inn West

89 N.C. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1988

Brower v. Robert Chappell & Assoc., Inc., 74 N.C. App. 317 , 328 S.E. 2d 45 , disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 537 , 335 S.E. 2d 313 (1985); Hutchens v. Hankins, 63 N.C. … Tempelos, 178 N.C. 487 , 101 S.E. 8 (1919); State v. Getward, 89 N.C. App. 26 , 365 S.E. 2d 209 (1988). The statute only allows a claim for relief against the local ABC Board or a permittee.

In Re Appeal of Camel City Laundry Co.

123 N.C. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 1996

On 12 November 1992, the Commission, sitting as the State Board of Equalization and Review, heard Camel City’s appeal of the Forsyth County Board’s decision. … See also Boekeloo v.

Fox v. Trustees of Consolidated University of North Carolina

16 N.C. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 30, 1972

In the recent cases of Glusman v. Board of Trustees and Lamb v. … Glusman v. Board of Trustees and Lamb v. Board of Trustees, *57 supra; Landwehr v. Regents of University of Colorado, 156 Colo. 1 , 396 P. 2d 451 (1964) ; Thompson v.

Sonopress, Inc. v. Town of Weaverville

139 N.C. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2000

See Weeks v. Town of Coats, 121 N.C. … Jordan v. Civil Service Board for the City of Charlotte, 137 N.C. App., 575, 578 , 528 S.E.2d 927, 930 (2000).

Isbey v. Crews

55 N.C. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981

the Board’s consent. … See Monger v. Lotterloh, supra. See generally Perkins v. Langdon, supra.

Hollingsworth v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

643 S.E.2d 675 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 2007

Dalldorf, a board certified orthopedic surgeon. Plaintiff reported to Dr. … Gilmore v. Hoke County Board of Education, 222 N.C. 358, 365 , 23 S.E.2d 292, 296 (1942); see also Cannon v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 171 N.C.

Merritt, Flebotte, Wilson, Webb & Caruso, PLLC v. Hemmings

196 N.C. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 2009

They previously were associates at the firm of Browne, Flebotte, Wilson & Webb, (Brown, Flebotte) the predecessor of Plaintiff law firm Merritt, Flebotte, Wilson, Webb & Caruso (Merritt, Flebotte). … Zimmerman v.

National Utility Review, LLC v. Care Centers, Inc.

200 N.C. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2009

Therefore, our analysis is limited to whether “the exercise of this jurisdiction over [] defendant comportfs] with constitutional standards of due process))]” Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. … Cameron-Brown, 83 N.C. App. at 284 , 350 S.E.2d at 114 .

State v. Hickson

25 N.C. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1975

See State v. Brown, 272 N.C. 512 , 158 S.E. 2d 354 (1968), and State v. Blount, 20 N.C. App. 448 , 201 S.E. 2d 566 (1974). … In State v.

Commissioner of Labor v. Weekley Homes, L.P.

169 N.C. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 2005

Com’n. are false foundations for the decision of the Safety and Health Review Board. … V. Petitioner’s third argument, that the Safety and Health Review Board did not address the issues of legislative intent or OSHA’s own regulations precluding multi-employer liability, was not assigned as error.

McKinney v. Goins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 12, 2023

As a result, Judge McGee would have denied the Board’s motion under this more stringent standard. See Stephenson v. … In urging us to read this history differently, the Board relies principally on University v. Foy, 5 N.C. 58 (1804).

State v. Riffe

191 N.C. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2008

The only person present when the search warrant was executed was Everette *88 Franklin Brown. Because Mr. Brown was the only individual present, the officers read the warrant to him. … Brown may have actually resided in defendant’s place of business in a separate room.

Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.

86 N.C. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1987

Hicks v. Brown Shoe Co., 64 N.C. App. 144 , 306 S.E. 2d 543 (1983), disc. rev. denied, 311 N.C. 304 , 317 S.E. 2d 680 (1984). The award *230 was entered prior to the effective date of G.S. 97-86.2.