Case law

State v. Teague

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 2022

STATE V. … STATE V.

State v. Cruz

166 N.C. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 2004

However, McQueen did not mail a copy of the motion to the school board attorney until 17 October 2002. … In a related appeal, State v. Evans, ___ N.C.App. ___, 601 S.E.2d 877 , 2004 WL 2093281 (2004), we addressed the same issues raised by the parties based upon similar facts. For the reasons stated in State v.

G.P. Publications, Inc. v. Quebecor Printing-St. Paul, Inc.

125 N.C. App. 424 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1997

In Glynwed, Inc. v. Plastimatic, Inc., 869 F. … Export, Co. v. RDI/Luxliner, Inc., 13 F.3d 69, 73 (3d Cir. 1993); Fiber-Lite Corp. v.

Williams v. Duke Power Co.

26 N.C. App. 392 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1975

Brown. The record reveals: Q. by Mr. McDaniel: Do you know whether those towers could have been put there without grading the soil itself?. Mr. Coley: Objection. Court: Sustained. … In Cutts v.

Alexander v. NC State Bd. of Elections

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2022

WARD, Plaintiffs, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, JEFF CARMON III, STACY EGGERS IV, WYATT T. … ALEXANDER V.

Hyde v. Chesney Glen Homeowners Ass'n

137 N.C. App. 605 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2000

See Smith v. Butler Mtn. Estates Property Owners Assn., 90 N.C. … See Shepard, Inc. v. Kim, Inc., 52 N.C.

Mainor v. K-Mart Corp.

79 N.C. App. 414 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1986

It argues relying on France v. Winn-Dixie Supermarket, Inc., 70 N.C. … Gillikin v. Burbage, 263 N.C. 317, 326 , 139 S.E. 2d 753, 760 (1965); Brown v. Neal, 283 N.C. 604 , 197 S.E. 2d 505 (1973).

Porter v. Leneave

119 N.C. App. 343 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1995

Supp. 1994) as well as the Brown and Bowen decisions upon which it relies. No right of action for wrongful death existed at common law, and the claim is entirely statutory, Armentrout v. … Brown v. Moore, 286 N.C. 664 , 213 S.E.2d 342 (1975), is cited as support for the holding.

Chesnutt v. Peters

44 N.C. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1980

The application of the whole record test is discussed by Justice Copeland in Thompson v. … Ormond v. Garrett, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 8 N.C. App. 662 , 175 S.E. 2d 371 (1970), 38 A.L.R. 3d 448 (1971).

Morris v. Morris

90 N.C. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988

See Beaman v. Beaman, 77 N.C. … Brown v. Brown, 47 N.C. App. 323, 327-328 , 267 S.E. 2d 345, 348-349 (1980). The court’s finding of fact here fails to set forth any of the required factors necessary to determine the reasonableness of the award.

State v. Clemons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 2020

Brown, 176 N.C. App. at 505, 626 S.E.2d at 753. … Brown, 176 N.C. App. at 505, 626 S.E.2d at 753 (2006) (citing Williams v. Bell, 167 N.C. App. 674, 678, 606 S.E.2d 436, 439 (2005)).

Commissioner of Labor v. Weekley Homes, L.P.

169 N.C. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 2005

Com’n. are false foundations for the decision of the Safety and Health Review Board. … V. Petitioner’s third argument, that the Safety and Health Review Board did not address the issues of legislative intent or OSHA’s own regulations precluding multi-employer liability, was not assigned as error.

Smith v. Cochran

124 N.C. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1996

At no time before the fall did plaintiff see any signs warning that the brown to brownish-red tile floor was wet. … Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc., 301 N.C. 200, 202, 271 S.E.2d 54, 57 (1980).

Duncan v. Duncan

193 N.C. App. 752 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 18, 2008

Embler v. Embler, 143 N.C. App. 162, 165 , 545 S.E.2d 259, 262 (2001) (quoting Turner v. Norfolk S. Corp., 137 N.C. App. 138, 142 , 526 S.E.2d 666, 670 (2000)). … Hunter v. Hunter, 126 N.C. App. 705, 707 , 486 S.E.2d 244, 245 (1997).

Clark v. Bichsel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2015

Sisk v. Transylvania Cmty. Hosp., Inc., 364 N.C. 172, 179, 695 S.E.2d 429, 434 (2010) (quoting Tillman v. … Brown v. Brown, 171 N.C. App. 358, 361, 615 S.E.2d 39, 41 (2005).

Goldman v. Parkland of Dallas, Inc.

7 N.C. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1970

Bowman *408 v. Curt G. Joa, Inc., supra; Byham v. National Cibo House Corp., supra; Bundy v. Commercial Credit Co., 200 N.C. 511 , 157 S.E. 860 (1931). … Board of Education v. Board of Education, 217 N.C. 90, 6 S.E. 2d 833 (1940). The offer in the present case, however, far exceeded the rule laid down in the Board of Education case, sufra.

Harbour Point Homeowners' Ass'n v. DJF Enterprises, Inc.

201 N.C. App. 720 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 5, 2010

and comer boards. … See Edwards v. Insurance Co., 173 N.C. 614 , 92 S.E. 695 (1917); Contracting Co. v. Ports Authority, 284 N.C. 732 , 202 S.E.2d 473 (1974); Novacare Orthotics & Prosthetics E., Inc. v. Speelman, 137 N.C.

Ratcliff v. County of Buncombe

81 N.C. App. 153 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

Similarly, in Ramsey v. … It is undisputed in the present case that plaintiff has accepted the benefits of the Act by being elected to the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners and by being elected chairman of the Board under the Act.

In re Stuart

59 N.C. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1982

Ray Bedsaul, secretary to the board, testified that both documents were part of Stuart’s master file with the board. … As stated in Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 (1975), there is a presumption of honesty and integrity in those serving as adjudicators and the petitioner must demonstrate a risk of bias or prejudgment.

In Re Hayes

199 N.C. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2009

Brown, Jr., a forensic psychiatrist from Virginia. Dr. … Brown stated that the risk was “small or slight.” Dr. Brown, however, believes that even a slight risk is unacceptable. Although Dr.