Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

0.60s

  • The Times News Publ'g Co. v. The Alamance-Burlington Bd. of Educ.

    797 S.E.2d 375 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2017

    V. ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON BD. OF EDUC. Opinion of the Court series of closed sessions of the Board. … In response, the Board filed a motion to dismiss -2- TIMES NEWS PUBL’G CO. V. ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON BD. OF EDUC.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Bennett

    67 N.C. App. 407 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1984

    See State v. Frizzelle, 243 N.C. 49 , 89 S.E. 2d 725 (1955); State v. Pearson, 288 N.C. 34 , 215 S.E. 2d 598 (1975); State v. Browning, 28 N.C. App. 376 , 221 S.E. 2d 375 (1976). … Frizzelle, 243 N.C. at 51 , 89 S.E. 2d at 727 ; Pearson, 288 N.C. at 42 , 215 S.E. 2d at 603 ; Browning, 28 N.C. App. at 378 , 221 S.E. 2d at 377 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fairfield v. WakeMed

    261 N.C. App. 569 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2018

    Moore v. Proper, 366 N.C. 25, 31, 726 S.E.2d 812, 817 (2012). … The only information we have is that the witness is “Board Certified.”

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Pike

    139 N.C. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 2000

    See Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 69 L. … Albers, 136 F.3d 670, 673 (9th Cir. 1998) (government’s traditional power to board a vessel is far greater than its power to enter a motor-home or car); United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Holloway

    250 N.C. App. 674 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2016

    State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569, 313 S.E.2d 585, 589 (1984) (citation omitted). … In Brown, the N.C.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Town Center Associates v. Y & C Corp.

    127 N.C. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 1997

    Liggett Group v. Sunas, 113 N.C. App. 19, 23 , 437 S.E.2d 674, 677 (1993). An interlocutory appeal is permissible only under specific statutory exceptions. Brown v. Brown, 77 N.C. … See Mckinney v. Royal Globe Insur. Co., 64 N.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Roney v. Joyner

    86 N.C. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1987

    Alford v. Shaw, 318 N.C. 289 , 349 S.E. 2d 41 (1986), reh'g allowed, 318 N.C. 703 , 351 S.E. 2d 738 (1987); Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A. 2d 805 (Del. Supr. 1984). … Hill v. Erwin Mills, Inc., 239 N.C. 437 , 80 S.E. 2d 358 (1954); Loy v. Lorm Corp., 52 N.C. App. 428 , 278 S.E. 2d 897 (1981); Swenson v. Thibaut, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cialino v. Wal-Mart Stores

    156 N.C. App. 463 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2003

    Cialino to Wal-Mart’s *466 company doctor at Knightdale Primary Care where Rena Hodges, a board certified Physician’s Assistant, initially diagnosed Ms. … v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Town of Newton Grove v. Sutton

    111 N.C. App. 376 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1993

    Defendants’ residence is permitted under Article V as a nonconforming use, and Article V plainly prohibits defendants from extending or enlarging this nonconforming use. … Defendants also argue, however, that plaintiff’s Board of Adjustment should have granted them a variance to place the mobile home on their property based on the Board’s authority to authorize variances on appeal in certain

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Green v. FISHING PIERS, INC.

    214 N.C. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2011

    Stat. § 18B-121 (2009) states: An aggrieved party has a claim for relief for damages against a permittee or local Alcoholic Beverage Control Board if: (1) The permittee or his agent or employee or the local board or its agent … . § 18B-120, et seq., was to create a cause of action where none previously existed against a permit-tee or local ABC Board. See Hall v. Toreros II, Inc., 176 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Washington

    402 S.E.2d 851 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 1991

    State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , 313 S.E.2d 585 (1984). Inter alia, it tends to show that defendant owned, controlled and possessed the cocaine, and that he and his friend intended to sell it. No error. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Broadway

    177 N.C. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2006

    In Matthews v. Brown, this Court held the trial court erred when it granted the plaintiffs double damages under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1-539.1. 62 N.C.App. 559 , 561, 303 S.E.2d 223 , 225 (1983). … Brown, 62 N.C.App. at 561 , 303 S.E.2d at 225 . Defendant was not a trespasser and is not subject to double damages *851 under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1-539.1. This assignment of error is overruled. V.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Shook Builders Supply Co. v. Eastern Associates, Inc.

    24 N.C. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1975

    See Page v. Sloan, 281 N.C. 697 , 190 S.E. 2d 189 (1972) ; Whitley v. Cubberly, 24 N.C. App. 204 , 210 S.E. 2d 289 (1974) ; Tolbert v. Tea Co., 22 N.C. App. 491 , 206 S.E. 2d 816 (1974) ; Borden, Inc. v. … Wade and Moore v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 205 , 203 S.E. 2d 666 (1974). See also Adickes v. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1970).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Reid

    66 N.C. App. 698 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1984

    The Attorney General, in his brief, responds as follows: This Court at first glance (State v. Walker, 6 N.C. App. 740 (1969)) and second glance (State v. McCullough, 40 N.C. App. 620 (1979)) and third glance (State v. … The Trustee or the Chairman of the Board of Deacons. Q. Do you know Mr. Reid (indicating Defendant), Mr. Jerry Dean Reid? A. No, I don’t. Q.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, NA v. Morgan

    176 S.E.2d 860 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 21, 1970

    Board of Education v. Wilson, 215 N.C. 216 , 1 S.E.2d 544 ; Woodcock v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 214 N.C. 224 , 199 S.E. 20 ; Thomas v. Clay, 187 N.C. 778 , 122 S.E. 852 ; Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. … of such a board, to be paid from the Trust funds.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Banks v. County of Buncombe

    128 N.C. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1998

    Tate; and The Buncombe County Board of Education, a body corporate, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … Food Stores v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 268 N.C. at 628-629 , 151 S.E.2d at 586 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Baker

    112 N.C. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1993

    In State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 165 , 293 S.E.2d 569 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed.2d 642 (1982), our Supreme Court made reference to State v. … Brown, 306 N.C. at 165-66 , 293 S.E.2d at 579 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Coffey v. Town of Waynesville

    143 N.C. App. 624 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2001

    Its role is similar to that of a municipal board deciding whether to grant or deny a conditional use permit under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-381(a), See Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. … Act-Up Triangle v. Comm’n for Health Servs., 345 N.C. 699 , 483 S.E.2d 388 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Wilson

    250 N.C. App. 781 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2016

    Brown v. Texas , 443 U.S. 47 , 50, 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). A. The encounter was a seizure. … State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Appeal of Ocean Isle Palms LLC

    219 N.C. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 2012

    Craig v. New Hanover Cty Bd. of Educ., 363 N.C. 334, 337 , 678 S.E.2d 351, 353 (2009) (citations and quotation marks omitted). … To perfect an appeal from the county board, an appellant must file a written notice of appeal with the clerk of the board of county commissioners and with the Property Tax Commission within 30 days after the county board

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.