Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,157 results
2.40s
Watlington v. Dep't of Soc. Servs. Rockingham Cty.
252 N.C. App. 512 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 2017
Wood v. Weldon, 160 N.C. App. 697, 699, 586 S.E.2d 801, 803 (2003) (quoting Weil v. Herring, 207 N.C. 6, 10, 175 S.E. 836, 838 (1934)). … Stat. § 126-1, which allows local governing boards to establish local personnel systems if they so choose.”
Cited 6 timesPublished86 N.C. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1987
Alford v. Shaw, 318 N.C. 289 , 349 S.E. 2d 41 (1986), reh'g allowed, 318 N.C. 703 , 351 S.E. 2d 738 (1987); Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A. 2d 805 (Del. Supr. 1984). … Hill v. Erwin Mills, Inc., 239 N.C. 437 , 80 S.E. 2d 358 (1954); Loy v. Lorm Corp., 52 N.C. App. 428 , 278 S.E. 2d 897 (1981); Swenson v. Thibaut, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublishedButler v. City Council of Clinton
160 N.C. App. 68 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2003
Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Alderman of Town of Garner, 139 N.C. App. 269, 271 , 533 S.E.2d 525, 527 (2000). As such, denial of a CUP is subject to review in the nature of certiorari by the superior court. … In a case similar to the instant case, Mann Media v.
Cited 2 timesPublished162 N.C. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 2004
Brown (Officer Brown) of the Winston-Salem Police Department responded to a call reporting gunfire. Officer Brown found two Hispanic women, Maria Santos (Santos) and Justina Dominguez (Dominguez), in the apartment. … See State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished65 N.C. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1983
v. … Brown v.
Cited 12 timesPublished191 N.C. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2008
After hearing this information, the officers searched the embankment area and discovered the brown container. The brown container possessed 221.9 grams of methamphetamine hydrochloride. Defendant did not testify. … See State v. Thompson, 141 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished169 N.C. App. 816 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 2005
. *818 At the hearing, an attorney for the Alamance County Board of Education (“Board”) appeared, insofar as the Board is the ultimate recipient of the forfeited bond, per N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-457.2 (2003). … The Board presented no evidence other than the forfeiture notice in the court file.
Cited 2 timesPublished166 N.C. App. 510 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 2004
However, McQueen did not mail a copy of the motion to the school board attorney until 17 October 2002. … For the reasons stated in State v. Evans , we affirm. Affirmed. Judge LEVINSON concurs. Judge WYNN dissents in a separate opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublished258 N.C. App. 144 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 20, 2018
State v. Brown, 142 N.C. App. 491, 492–93, 543 S.E.2d 192, 193 (2001). -5- STATE V. … State v. Brown, 142 N.C. App. 491, 492–93, 543 S.E.2d 192, 193 (2001) (citations omitted).
Cited 8 timesPublished116 N.C. App. 651 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1994
Hotel L’Europe, Inc. and Triangle V, Limited Partnership (Taxpayers) appeal from a decision of the North Carolina Property Tax Commission (the Commission), sitting as the State Board of Equalization and Review which affirmed … the decision of the Durham County Board of Equalization and Review (the Board) denying Taxpayer Hotel L’Europe’s request of Durham County (County) to revalue its property.
Cited 2 timesPublished158 N.C. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2003
On 13 February 2001, plaintiff (David Evans) filed a complaint for divorce from bed and board, child custody, writ of possession of the marital home, equitable distribution, and attorney’s fees. … Turner v. Norfolk S. Corp., 137 N.C. App. 138, 142 , 526 S.E.2d 666, 670 (2000) (quoting Blackwelder v. Dept. of Human Resources, 60 N.C. App. 331, 335 , 299 S.E.2d 777, 780-81 (1983), and Jeffreys v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDep't of Transp. v. Mountain Vills.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2022
V. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished166 N.C. App. 240 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004
Kresge Co. v. Davis, 277 N.C. 654 , 662, 178 S.E.2d 382 , 386 (1971) (quoting Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1 , 8, 64 S.Ct. 397 , 401, 88 L.Ed. 497 , 503 (1944)). … See Grutter v.
Cited 1 timesPublished37 N.C. App. 163 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1978
In the recent case of State v. … It was identical to the statement read into the record by Officer Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNc Bd. of Ex., Etc. v. Nc St. Bd. of Education
334 S.E.2d 503 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 1, 1985
334 S.E.2d 503 (1985) NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF EXAMINERS FOR SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PATHOLOGISTS AND AUDIOLOGISTS v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, A. … Milk Commission v. Food Stores, 270 N.C. 323 , 154 S.E.2d 548 (1967).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2024
State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237, 247, 321 S.E.2d 856, 862 (1984). … In accord with Brown and State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished120 N.C. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1995
Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 255, 263 , 393 S.E.2d 134, 138 , cert. denied, 395 S.E.2d 675 (1990). … Lyerly’s statements are “presumed to be made in good faith and without malice, cancelling plaintiff’s presumption of actual malice arising on statements defamatory per se. ” Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAronov v. Secretary of Revenue
85 N.C. App. 677 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1987
Aronov appealed to the Tax Review Board, and the Board affirmed the Assistant Secretary’s decision. … This assessment was sustained by the Assistant Secretary and the Tax Review Board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 2022
DAVIDSON V. … In making its determination, the trial court explains it used the “direct observations of witness Kandice Brown[,]” DAVIDSON V.
Cited 0 timesPublished38 N.C. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1978
Fracasse v. … Plaintiff asserts also that, by virtue of the charging lien he filed against any recovery defendants might have from the School Board, he was entitled to a judgment in his favor against the Board. We disagree.
Cited 29 timesPublished
Ask Donna