Case law

State v. Barthel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2025

Commissioner Tim Phillips, the Board’s chairman, soon announced that -2-  STATE V. … The Board’s forum served a specific purpose.

Harrell v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.

54 N.C. App. 582 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1981

Brown. Dr. Brown testified that in January 1977, he diagnosed plaintiff’s shortness of breath and chest pains as symptoms of his heart disease. He further stated, “Mr. … Daugherty v. Watts, Ky., 419 S.W. 2d 137 (1967).

Matter of Hunt

46 N.C. App. 732 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1980

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 (1977). The Clause has also been held applicable in some circumstances to proceedings which terminate prior to judgment. Arizona v. … Brown v. Neal, 283 N.C. 604 , 197 S.E. 2d 606 (1973).

Mathis v. Daly

205 N.C. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2010

Background Defendant was president of the Board of Directors (“the Board”) of the Haywood County Council on Aging (“the HCCA”). Denise Mathis (“plaintiff’) was first employed by the HCCA in 1999. … Wells v. Liddy, 186 F.3d 505, 532 (4th Cir. *203 1999).

State v. Boomer

168 N.C. App. 240 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2005

Paris v. … See State v. Jones, 358 N.C. 473 , 598 S.E.2d 125 (2004); State v. Sneed, 358 N.C. 538 , 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004).

State v. Lemus

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2020

STATE V. … The school board appealed the denial of its sanctions motion to this Court, but the Court rejected the board’s arguments and affirmed the trial court’s order. State v. Lemus, __ N.C.

Wake Forest Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Wake Forest

212 N.C. App. 632 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2011

The Wake Forest Board of Commissioners relied upon our Supreme Court’s decision in River Birch Associates v. … See Dunn v.

State v. Rhoney

42 N.C. App. 40 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1979

See State v. Dorsett, 272 N.C. 227 , 158 S.E. 2d 15 (1967). The parties cite to us Coastal Highway v. Turnpike Authority, 237 N.C. 52 , 74 S.E. 2d 310 (1953), and Jackson v. … Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 (1969), for the proposition that while administrative powers may be delegated, legislative powers may not be.

State v. Diez

185 N.C. App. 160 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2007

State v. Brown, 142 N.C. App. 491, 492-93 , 543 S.E.2d 192, 193-94 (2001). The rule in this State is that notice must be specifically given. State v. McBride, 120 N.C. App. 623, 625 , 463 S.E.2d 403, 404 (1995). … State v. Williams, 280 N.C. 132, 137 , 184 S.E.2d 875, 878 (1971). "It is the appellant's duty and responsibility to see that the record is in proper form and complete." State v.

Yates Constr. Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2016

See Estate of Browne v. Thompson, 219 N.C. … P. 18 (setting forth requirements for taking appeal “from administrative agencies, boards, or commissions”); Strezinski v. City of Greensboro, 187 N.C.

Lyles v. City of Charlotte

120 N.C. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1995

Britt v. Wilmington, 236 N.C. 446, 450 , 73 S.E.2d 289, 293 (1952); see also Clark v. … of Education (the Board).

Ply-Marts, Inc. v. Phileman

40 N.C. App. 767 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1979

Schloss v. Jamison, 258 N.C. 271 , 128 S.E. 2d 590 (1962). … Brown v. Ward, 221 N.C. 344 , 20 S.E. 2d 324 (1942). Plaintiff must prove it is entitled to damages under a contract for labor and materials before it is entitled to enforcement of the lien.

Royal v. Armstrong

136 N.C. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2000

Burton instructed the children not to run to the board and to be sure the diving area in front of the board was clear before jumping off the diving board. *468 After the “nerf” game ended, some of the children, including … In Pruitt v.

City of Asheville v. Bowman

172 N.C. App. 586 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005

See Harper v. City of Asheville, 160 N.C.App. 209 , 215, 585 S.E.2d 240 , 244 (2003)(citing O'Donnell v. City of Asheville, 113 N.C.App. 178 , 180, 438 S.E.2d 422 , 423 (1993)). … See Worley v.

Wells v. Consolidated Judicial Retirement System

136 N.C. App. 671 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2000

State v. Benton, 276 N.C. 641, 658 , 174 S.E.2d 793, 804 (1970) (citations omitted). Further, if we give N.C. Gen. Stat. § 135-52 the broad reading for which the Board argues, we render the specific provisions of N.C. … See Food Stores v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 268 N.C. 624, 628-29 , 151 S.E.2d 582, 586 (1966); State v. Hutson, 10 N.C. App. 653, 657 , 179 S.E.2d 858, 861 (1971). Here, the Board argues that N.C. Gen.

Jarrett v. N.C. Dept. of Cultural Resources

101 N.C. App. 475 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1991

. § 150A-51 (now § 150B-51) in reviewing decision of the North Carolina Safety and Health Review Board); Watson v. North Carolina Real Estate Comm’n, 87 N.C. … [T]he “whole record” rule requires the court, in determining the substantiality of evidence supporting the Board’s decision, to take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from the weight of the Board’s evidence

Oliver v. Lane Co.

143 N.C. App. 167 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2001

Brown v. S & N Communications, Inc., 124 N.C. App. 320 , 477 S.E.2d [197] (1996). 5. Plaintiff made reasonable efforts to obtain suitable employment without assistance from defendant. … Brown v. S & N Communications, Inc., 124 N.C. App. 320 , 477 S.E.2d 197 (1996).

Town of Winterville v. King

60 N.C. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1983

Barrier v. Troutman, 231 N.C. 47 , 55 S.E. 2d 923 (1949); Clinton v. Ross, 226 N.C. 682 , 40 S.E. 2d 593 (1946); Guyton v. Board of Transportation, 30 N.C. App. 87 , 226 S.E. 2d 175 (1976); Frink v. … Board of Pharmacy v. Lane, 248 N.C. 134 , 102 S.E. 2d 832 (1958); Mills v. Cemetery Park Corp., 242 N.C. 20 , 86 S.E. 2d 893 (1955); Dare County v. Mater, 235 N.C. 179 , 69 S.E. 2d 244 (1952); Clinton v.

In re S.M.

190 N.C. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 2008

The Court first discussed State v. … For example, in In re Brown, the juvenile respondent was reprimanded for talking during a test.

Radinger v. Asheville Sch., Inc.

812 S.E.2d 914 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 2018

However, in Brenner v. … Mezzanotte v. Freeland , 20 N.C.