Case law

State v. Carter

66 N.C. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1984

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 502 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 (1983) (use of artificial illumination “simply does not constitute a search”); see also 1 W. … Brown, supra, which closer examination quickly confirmed. The court thus properly admitted evidence of the discovery and seizure of the tractor and trailer.

Manning v. County of Halifax

166 N.C. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004

However, the trial court's conclusions of law are reviewable de novo. " Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C. App. 420 , 423, 524 S.E.2d 95 , 98 (2000) (citations omitted). … See State v. Fluker, 139 N.C. App. 768 , 776-77, 535 S.E.2d 68 , 74 (2000); State v. Thomas, 332 N.C. 544 , 553-54, 423 S.E.2d 75 , 80 (1992), overruled on other grounds by State v.

State v. McLaurin

12 N.C. App. 23 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 14, 1971

State v. Parker, 7 N.C. App. 191 , 171 S.E. 2d 665 ; State v. West, 51 N.C. 505 . The court did not, however, so instruct the jury but required the State to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt. … State v. Cox, 11 N.C.

Simms v. Bolger

264 N.C. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 2019

Thus, we need not address the timeliness of the Motion under Browne v. Browne, 101 N.C. App. 617, 624, 400 S.E.2d 736, 740 (1991) and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-13.5(d)(1) (2017). … Belk v. Belk, 221 N.C.

Outlaw v. Johnson

190 N.C. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2008

In State v. Brown, 357 N.C. 382 , 584 S.E.2d 278 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1194 , 158 L. … Our Court apparently overlooked Brown in reaching a contrary result in Headley v. Williams, 162 N.C.

In re: Pop Capitol Towers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2022

Bryant v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr., 2022-NCCOA-89, ¶33 (citing Carolina Power & Light Co. v. … Utilities Comm’n v.

Dellinger v. Lincoln Cty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 2019

Handy v. PPG Indus., 154 N.C. App. 311, 321, 571 S.E.2d 853, 860 (2002). A party who asserts a board member is biased against them may move for recusal. … “[E]xposure to rumors is not, in and of itself, cause to believe that Board members have been biased” Evers v. Pender Cty. Bd. of Educ., 104 N.C. App. 1, 16, 407 S.E.2d 879, 887 (1991).

City of Asheville v. Bowman

172 N.C. App. 586 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005

See Harper v. City of Asheville, 160 N.C.App. 209 , 215, 585 S.E.2d 240 , 244 (2003)(citing O'Donnell v. City of Asheville, 113 N.C.App. 178 , 180, 438 S.E.2d 422 , 423 (1993)). … See Worley v.

Chloride, Inc. v. Honeycutt

71 N.C. App. 805 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1984

Coble v. Coble, 300 N.C. 708 , 268 S.E. 2d 185 (1980); Davis v. Davis, 11 N.C. App. 115 , 180 S.E. 2d 374 (1971). As we noted in a footnote in Kraemer v. Moore, 67 N.C. … Brown Distributors, 307 N.C. 342 , 298 S.E. 2d 357 (1983).

Swan Beach Corolla, L.L.C. v. Cnty. of Currituck

814 S.E.2d 582 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2018

Nelson v. City of Burlington

80 N.C. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1986

Planning Board: The Planning Board may on its own motion recommend to the City Council changes and amendments to any of the districts or regulations herein established. C. … In Allred v. City of Raleigh, supra, and Blades v.

Riggs v. Coble

37 N.C. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 1978

See Martin v. Underhill, 265 N.C. 669 , 144 S.E. 2d 872 (1965). The Secretary’s conclusions were legitimately drawn from his findings which were supported by the evidence and are not contested. … Therefore, the Board correctly affirmed the Secretary’s decision. The judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Board was without error and is Affirmed. Judges Parker and Hedrick concur.

University of North Carolina v. Shoemate

113 N.C. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1994

Co. v. Miller Machine Co., 60 N.C. App. 155 , 298 S.E.2d 190 (1982). … Ingram v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 258 N.C. 632, 638 , 129 S.E.2d 222, 227 (1963).

Henderson v. The Cnty. of Onslow

245 N.C. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2016

See Estates, Inc. v. … Compare Wesley v.

State v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2022

State v. Marino, 265 N.C. App. 546, 549, 828 S.E.2d 689, 692 (2019).  STATE V. … See State v.

State v. Reid

104 N.C. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1991

Officer Brown observed a person later identified as defendant driving the car. Officer Brown testified that the vehicle was traveling at an accelerated speed without its headlights on. … Moreover, in State v.

NCCA v. NC State Bd. of Educ.

468 S.E.2d 539 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1996

468 S.E.2d 539 (1996) NORTH CAROLINA CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent. No. COA95-422. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. … The Board's denial was unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record; and c. The Board's denial was arbitrary and capricious.

Perkins v. Perkins

85 N.C. App. 660 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1987

. § 50-7 to obtain a divorce from bed and board. Stanback v. Stanback, 270 N.C. 497 , 155 S.E. 2d 221 (1967). … Five of the grounds listed in N.C.G.S. § 50-16.2 are identical to the five grounds listed in N.C.G.S. § 50-7, permitting divorces from bed and board. Minor v. Minor, 70 N.C.

Miller v. Miller

253 N.C. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2017

MILLER V. … V.

State v. Watson

65 N.C. App. 411 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1983

Those are matters for the Board of Parole under the law. … In State v.