Case law

Whisnant v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

191 N.C. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2008

Petitioner undertakes an exhaustive analysis of our case law, focusing heavily on Faulkenbury v. Teachers’ & State Employees Ret. Sys., 345 N.C. 683 , 483 S.E.2d 422 (1997). … Tripp v. City of Winston-Salem, 188 N.C. App. 577, 583 , 655 S.E.2d 890, 894 (2008) (quotations and citation omitted). Petitioner’s entire argument is therefore without merit.

Beaufort County Schools v. Roach

114 N.C. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1994

and reversing the Board’s decision. … Clay v. Employment Security Commission of N.C., 111 N.C. App. 599, 602 , 432 S.E.2d 873, 875 (1993), disc. review allowed, 335 N.C. 553 , — S.E.2d — (1994); Jarrett v. N.C. Dep’t of Cultural Resources, 101 N.C.

Davidson County v. City of High Point

85 N.C. App. 26 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1987

In Duke Power Co. v. City of High Point, 69 N.C. … Abernethy v. Board of Comm’rs, 169 N.C. 631 , 86 S.E. 577 (1915).

State v. Beatty

189 N.C. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 1, 2008

BROWN: May we approach the bench? THE COURT: Sure. . … State v. Cunningham, 188 N.C. App. -, —, — S.E.2d —, — (2008) (quoting State v.

Nelson v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 2025

Brown v. Motor Inns of Carolina, Inc., 47 N.C. App. 115, 118 (1980) (citations omitted). … For example, in Phillips v.

Badin Shores Resort Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Handy Sanitary Dist.

257 N.C. App. 542 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 2018

Opinion of the Court boards for the public welfare, unless their action is so clearly unreasonable as to amount to an oppressive and manifest abuse of discretion.” Halifax Paper Co. v. … board. . . . 4.

Bullard v. Wake County

221 N.C. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2012

Dawes v. Nash Cnty., 357 N.C. 442, 445 , 584 S.E.2d 760, 762 (2003). See also Meyer v. … . § 153A-435 but applicable to school boards. The school board’s insurance policy provided “coverage for damages in excess of the Board’s self-insured retention of $1,000,000.” Magana, 183 N.C.

Bauman v. Pasquotank Cty. ABC Bd.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2020

Plaintiff argues that the Board had no adverse possession during the term of the trust because Emma was estopped from suing to eject the Board under the theory of estoppel by deed. See, e.g., Crawley v. … Brooks v.

Comer v. Ammons

135 N.C. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1999

In that case, the plaintiffs filed an action to enjoin a special election of a mayor and Board of Aldermen. The injunction was denied, the election was held, and the new mayor and board were seated. … See also, Kelly v. Reed, 355 P.2d 969 (Nev. 1960); Misch v. Russell, 26 N.E. 528 (Ill. 1891); and State ex rel Neu v.

County of Guilford v. National Union Fire Insurance

108 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1992

Brown, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee. WYNN, Judge. On 15 January 1986, George Harris, an inmate in the Guilford County Jail, suffered severe injuries in an assault by another inmate. Mr. … Our Supreme Court's recent decision in Rowan County Board of Education v.

Stanley v. Retirement & Health Benefits Division, Dept. of State Treasurer

55 N.C. App. 588 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1982

Bridges v. Charlotte, 221 N.C. 472, 477 , 20 S.E. 2d 825, 829 (1942). Accord, Powell v. State Retirement System, 3 N.C. App. 39 , 164 S.E. 2d 80 (1968). … We are further persuaded by the reasoning in Meachan v. Board of Education, 47 N.C. App. 271 , 267 S.E. 2d 349 (1980).

The VILLAGES AT RED BRIDGE, LLC v. Weisner

209 N.C. App. 604 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2011

Administrative review begins in the County Board of Equalization and Review.” Johnston v. Gaston County, 71 N.C. App. 707, 709 , 323 S.E.2d 381, 382 (1984), cert. denied, 313 N.C. 508 , 329 S.E.2d 392 (1985). … King v. Baldwin, 276 N.C. 316, 326 , 172 S.E.2d 12, 18 (1970) (reviewing previous version of provisions under Chapter 105 which are the same as those currently in place in pertinent aspects).

State v. Lynch

94 N.C. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1989

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 357 (1979). … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 587 (1984). We find the evidence in this case to be sufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction for resisting a public officer.

Bailey v. Ford Motor Co.

244 N.C. App. 346 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2015

V. … [Defendant], but not [plaintiff], shall be bound by the decision of the Policy Board.

Elec-Trol, Inc. v. C. J. Kern Contractors, Inc.

54 N.C. App. 626 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1981

Graham and Son, Inc. v. Board of Education, 25 N.C. App. 163 , 212 S.E. 2d 542 , cert. denied, 287 N.C. 465 , 215 S.E. 2d 623 (1975). In Heating Co. v. … Concrete Company v. Lumber Company, 256 N.C. 709 , 124 S.E. 2d 905 (1962). For example, in Brokers, Inc. v. Board of Education, 33 N.C.

State v. Williams

95 N.C. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1989

Id., citing State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). … See State v. Brown, supra. Defendant’s argument on appeal speaks almost exclusively to the fact that the State could not establish that the fingerprints were impressed on the day the television was taken.

Enterprise Leasing Co. Southeast v. Williams

177 N.C. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 2006

Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co., 326 N.C. 387 , *69 392, 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990) (citation omitted). … Co. v.

In Re Appeal of David H. Murdock Research Institute

220 N.C. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 2012

White v. White, 296 N.C. 661, 667 , 252 S.E.2d 698, 702 (1979). … Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 533 , 180 S.E.2d 823, 829 (1971). Moreover, N.C. Gen.

Best v. Ford Motor Co.

148 N.C. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 28, 2001

As this Court stated in Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C. … Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C. App. 264, 269 , 276 S.E.2d 718, 723 (1981) (citing Caudill v. Mfg. Co., 258 N.C. 99, 102 , 128 S.E.2d 128, 130 (1962)).

State v. Sparrow

7 N.C. App. 107 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 1969

Board of Public Instruction, 368 U.S. 278 , 7 L. ed 2d 285; 82 S. Ct. 275 ; State v. Hales, 256 N.C. 27 , 122 S.E. 2d 768 . Even so, impossible standards of statutory clarity are not required by the constitution. … State v. Brown, 271 N.C. 250 , 156 S.E. 2d 272 (1967); State v. Poolos, 241 N.C. 382 , 85 S.E. 2d 342 (1955).