Case law

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2020

At this hearing, the attorney for the Board reasserted that while -3-  STATE V. … (citations omitted)); State v. Knight, 255 N.C.

Florence v. Hiatt

101 N.C. App. 539 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1991

Judge Parker’s order granted a prayer for judgment continued on condition that plaintiff not violate any motor vehicle laws and that he make a $75.00 contribution to the school board. In State v. Cheek, 31 N.C. … State v. Wilburn, 57 N.C. App. 40 , 290 S.E.2d 782 (1982). We find that the condition in Judge Parker’s order that plaintiff make a contribution to the school board is unenforceable surplusage.

Tully v. City of Wilmington

249 N.C. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2016

Dobrowolska v. … This insures that those who appear before a board will be treated equally. We believe this rationale is sound. Farlow v. N.C.

State v. Cannon

254 N.C. App. 794 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2017

State v. … See Saunders , 245 N.C. at 342 , 95 S.E.2d at 879 ; State v. S. Ry. Co. , 141 N.C. 846 , 851, 54 S.E. 294 , 296 (1906) ; Brown , 221 N.C.App. at 387 , 732 S.E.2d at 587-88 ; Hinkle v.

State v. Anderson

88 N.C. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1988

See Brandis on North Carolina Evidence, Section 143 (2d revised ed. 1982); Masters v. Dunstan, 256 N.C. 520, 526 , 124 S.E. 2d 574, 578 (1962); Reliable Properties, Inc. v. McAllister, 77 N.C. … See, e.g., Watson Seafood and Poultry Co. v. George W. Thomas, Inc., 289 N.C. 7, 13 , 220 S.E. 2d 536, 541 (1975); State v. Hales, 256 N.C. 27, 30 , 122 S.E. 2d 768, 771 (1961); State v. Howard, 78 N.C.

Bouvier v. Porter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2021

BOUVIER V. … BOUVIER V.

State v. Richardson

226 N.C. App. 292 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2013

Although Stamecca Brown had previously worked at the Carousel Club, she was present at that location as a customer on 20 May 2009. Ms. Brown left the club at the same time as Ms. Reed and Mr. Kinard. … Brown to attempt to “calm her down.” After Mr. Kinard became upset, Ms. Brown saw him taking off his jacket. Despite the fact that Ms. Brown heard Mr. Snowden and Mr. Kinard arguing, she could not see them.

Ridge Care, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services

214 N.C. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2011

V. … Browning Jr., on behalf of Attorney General Roy Cooper. This argument is without merit. VI.

State v. Absher

26 N.C. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 1975

The car was parked beside a road near Brown Mountain Gorge in Caldwell County.. The windows were rolled down slightly, and the binoculars were under the front seat. … Evidence § 179 (Brandis rev. 1973) ; see State v. Case, 253 N.C. 130 , 116 S.E. 2d 429 (1960). However, the landmark case of Miranda v.

State v. McAdoo

165 N.C. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2004

In State v. … Hunt, 330 N.C. at 427 , 410 S.E.2d at 480 (citing State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40 , 58, 337 S.E.2d 808 , 822 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1165 , 106 S.Ct. 2292 , 90 L.Ed.2d 733 (1986)).

State v. King

6 N.C. App. 702 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1969

State v. … termination or revocation at the discretion of the State Board of Health. . . .”

Williams v. Town of Spencer

129 N.C. App. 828 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1998

Our Supreme Court in White v. … Id. at 39 , 411 S.E.2d at 659 -60 (citing Appalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. Board of Adjustment, 52 N.C. App. 266, 274 , 278 S.E.2d 321, 326 (1981)).

State v. Kaplan

23 N.C. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1974

In State v. … In State v.

Philpott v. Kerns

18 N.C. App. 663 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1973

Distributors v. McAndrews, 270 N.C. 91 , 153 S.E. 2d 770 ; 62 Am. Jur. 2d, Process, § 68, p. 848. … Leasing, Inc. v. Brown, 14 N.C. App. 383 , 188 S.E. 2d 574 ; Williams v. Hartis, 18 N.C. App. 89 , 195 S.E. 2d 806 .

Morris v. E.A. Morris Charitable Foundation

161 N.C. App. 673 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 2003

We note that plaintiffs filed a related suit against several members of the Foundation’s board of directors, seeking their removal from the board and other relief, which is also decided this date. See Morris v. … See Board of Trustees of UNC-CH v.

State v. Lanier

165 N.C. App. 337 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2004

Defendant next contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence regarding a fire at the home defendant shared with Dorian Lanier on Ludie Brown Road (Ludie Brown house). … After the fire, Dorian Lanier sold the Ludie Brown property for $55,000.

N.C. Ass'n of Educators, Inc. v. State

241 N.C. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 2015

Martin v. … See also Peace v. Emp't Sec. Comm'n of North Carolina, 349 N.C. 315 , 321-22, 507 S.E.2d 272 , 281-82 (1998) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 570-71, 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 2705-06, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) ).

State v. Burnette

158 N.C. App. 716 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2003

In Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 , 102 L. … McLaurin, 320 N.C. 143, 146 , 357 S.E.2d 636, 638 (1987) (quoting State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 589 (1984)).

Monroe v. City of New Bern

158 N.C. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 2003

Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 629 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 385 (1980). … “[V]ested rights in a building cannot be destroyed summarily as a nuisance unless in a great emergency.” Id. at 185. See also Leppo v. City of Petaluma, 97 Cal. Rptr. 840, 843 (Cal. Ct.

Essex Group, Inc. v. Express Wire Services, Inc.

157 N.C. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2003

Ramsey removed four brown boxes and the Gateway *362 box from the storage unit and loaded the boxes in his car. … See Clark v. Penland, 146 N.C. App. 288 , 552 S.E.2d 243 (2001); Hursey v. Homes By Design, Inc., 121 N.C. App. 175 , 464 S.E.2d 504 (1995); Segrest v. Gillette, 96 N.C.