Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,157 results
2.19s
Ira Ex Rel. Oppenheimer v. Brenner Companies, Inc.
107 N.C. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 1992
The remaining defendants acted as Brenner’s Board of Directors (“Board”) at the time when plaintiffs filed their lawsuit. … The lack of soliciting third-party buyers does not render a merger suspect; it is only when a board fails to properly investigate the worth of the company that suspicion is aroused. Smith v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedTinch v. Video Industrial Services, Inc.
120 N.C. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1995
PER CURIAM For the reasons stated in Brown v. Friday Services, Inc., 119 N.C. App. 753 , 460 S.E.2d 356 (1995), we affirm the entry of summary judgment in this case. … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYates Construction Co. v. Commissioner of Labor for North Carolina
126 N.C. App. 147 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1997
The Review Board has routinely found that broken bones are serious injuries. Brooks v. Int’l Minerals & Chemical Corp., 3 NCOSHD 393, 397 (RB 1989). … In re Dailey v. Board of Dental Examiners, 60 N.C. App. 441, 447 , 299 S.E.2d 473, 478 , (citations omitted), rev’d on other grounds, 309 N.C. 710 , 309 S.E.2d 219 (1983).
Cited 3 timesPublished235 N.C. App. 121 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2014
Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph Cnty. Planning Bd., 356 N.C. 1, 13, 565 S.E.2d 9, 17 (2002) (citations and quotation marks omitted). … Boards of Adjustments, and other local government boards, perform vital services within our governmental structure.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCardwell v. FORSYTH CTY. ZON. BD. OF ADJ.
362 S.E.2d 843 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1987
Eugene Price, Jr., and Jonathan V. … Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co., Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620 , 265 S.E.2d 379 (1980). In Humble Oil & Refining Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 N.C. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 9, 1974
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 889 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 . … “The Court: Who owns the Brown Derby?
Cited 8 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 2021
¶ 19 In Brown v. Ellis, this Court also addressed notice requirements in an action involving alienation of affection and criminal conversation claims. 206 N.C. … Brown, 206 N.C. App. at 108, 696 S.E.2d at 823.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NC v. State
200 N.C. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 2009
STATE of North Carolina; Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North Carolina; State Board of Elections; and Gary O. Bartlett, as Executive Director of the State Board, Defendants. No. COA08-1413. … (quoting Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 745 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1286 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714, 732 (1974)).
Cited 5 timesPublishedHarper v. Vohra Wound Physicians of NY
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2020
Brown, Faucher, Peraldo & Benson, PLLC, by Drew Brown, for plaintiff- appellee. Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, by Matthew Nis Leerberg, Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., and Kip D. … Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 522, 507 S.E.2d 894, 895–96 (1998) (citing Shelton, 318 N.C. at 81-82, 347 S.E.2d at 828).
Cited 0 timesPublishedForsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Chisholm
117 N.C. App. 608 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1995
Everton, 50 N.C. (5 Jones) 241 (1858); Cole v. Adams, 56 N.C. App. 714 , 289 S.E.2d 918 (1982); and Memorial Hospital of Alamance County, Inc. v. Brown, 50 N.C. App. 526 , 274 S.E.2d 277 (1981). … In Brown , the issue of separation was not directly treated by the trial court. Brown, 50 N.C. App. at 531 , 274 S,E.2d at 281.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBerkeley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Terra Del Sol, Inc.
111 N.C. App. 692 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1993
See Ramsey v. Keever’s Used Cars, 92 N.C. App. 187 , 374 S.E.2d 135 (1988); Uzzell v. Integon Life Ins. Corp., 78 N.C. App. 458 , 337 S.E.2d 639 (1985), cert. denied, 317 N.C. 341 , 346 S.E.2d 149 (1986); Russo v. … Brown ought to or would be called as a witness by either party in the matter.
Cited 7 timesPublished13 N.C. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 23, 1972
State v. McCall, 273 N.C. 135 , 159 S.E. 2d 316 (1968) ; State v. Garris, 265 N.C. 711 , 144 S.E. 2d 901 (1965). … State v. Wright, 272 N.C. 264 , 158 S.E. 2d 50 (1967).
Cited 39 timesPublishedDaniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. Furst
43 N.C. App. 95 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1979
See Parker v. White, supra; Hutchins v. Davis, 230 N.C. 67 , 52 S.E. 2d 210 (1949); Fields v. Brown, 160 N.C. 295 , 76 S.E. 8 (1912); Van Gilder v. Bullen, 159 N.C. 291 , 74 S.E. 1059 (1912). … Camilco contends that it is not bound by Clarence McGillen’s execution of the modification agreement, because no resolution of the board of directors authorized it. No formal resolution is needed.
Cited 18 timesPublished65 N.C. App. 822 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1984
On 5 May 1981 defendant Town entered an option contract with defendant Brown-Loving Co. for sale of the Town’s Crow Hill Park property. … See Best v. Perry, 41 N.C. App. 107, 109-10 , 254 S.E. 2d 281, 283 (1979).
Cited 0 timesPublished91 N.C. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1988
Browne was appointed to represent the defendant and the defendant was aware of that fact. 3. … United States v. Zolp, 659 F.
Cited 9 timesPublished57 N.C. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 18, 1982
Badame v. Lampke, supra at 757, 89 S.E. 2d at 468 . The present statement, at its worst, indicates that plaintiff lied in relating the circumstances under which she left her job with the Board of Education. … Williams v. Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc. and Willard v. Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc., supra.
Cited 37 timesPublished33 N.C. App. 537 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1977
G.S. 1-277; Industries, Inc. v. Blair, 10 N.C. App. 323 , 178 S.E. 2d 781 *540 (1971). … promulgated by the Board of Transportation or the Secretary of Transportation.
Cited 2 timesPublished795 S.E.2d 827 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2017
Co., LLC v. White Oak Transp. Co., Inc. , 362 N.C. 191 , 194, 657 S.E.2d 361 , 362-63 (2008). "[E]ven pro se appellants must adhere strictly to the Rules of Appellate Procedure...." Strauss v. Hunt , 140 N.C. … McKoy v. McKoy , 202 N.C. App. 509 , 511, 689 S.E.2d 590 , 592 (2010). "Subject matter jurisdiction is conferred upon the courts by either the North Carolina Constitution or by statute." Harris v. Pembaur , 84 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBd. of Examiners v. STATE BD. OF EDUC.
468 S.E.2d 826 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1996
468 S.E.2d 826 (1996) NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF EXAMINERS FOR SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PATHOLOGISTS AND AUDIOLOGISTS, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Bobby R. … State v. Hart, 287 N.C. 76, 80 , 213 S.E.2d 291, 295 (1975).
Cited 0 timesPublished647 S.E.2d 129 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2007
See, e.g., Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357, 362 (1979). … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984) (citing State v. Smith, 300 N.C. 71, 78 , 265 S.E.2d 164, 169 (1980)).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna