Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.01s

  • Onslow Wholesale Plumbing & Electrical Supply, Inc. v. Fisher

    60 N.C. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1982

    In Kessler v. … In Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Company v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilhelm v. Wilhelm

    43 N.C. App. 549 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1979

    An action for divorce from bed and board will support an award of permanent alimony, child support and counsel fees. That is one of the purposes of the action. Rayfield v. … Rayfield, 242 N.C. 691 , 89 S.E. 2d 399 (1955); Norman v. Norman, 230 N.C. 61 , 51 S.E. 2d 927 (1949); Cavendish v. Cavendish, 38 N.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re: Davis

    256 N.C. App. 436 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 2017

    (“Eugenics Board”). … See, e.g., State v. Goss, 361 N.C. 610, 622, 651 S.E.2d 867, 875 (2007); State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Daniel Construction Co. v. Brooks

    73 N.C. App. 426 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1985

    See the much cited and quoted case of Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). … Ray Evers Welding Co. v. OSHRC, 625 F. 2d 726 (6th Cir. 1980).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Town of Pinebluff v. Moore Cty.

    261 N.C. App. 747 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2018

    of county commissioners to serve as a representative on the planning board and the board of adjustment, as provided in G.S. 160A-362. … See Greensboro v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Allen

    102 N.C. App. 598 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1991

    In Brown v. … Brown, 422 U.S. 590, 602-04 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 426-27 . Upon review of the facts in the case below in light of the factors pronounced in Brown v.

    Reversed on other grounds by State v. Allen, 332 N.C. 123 (1992)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Whichard v. CH Mortg. Co.

    789 S.E.2d 568 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2016

    Intercraft Industries Corp. v. Morrison, 305 N.C. 373 , 376, 289 S.E.2d 357 , 359 (1982). The Board of Review's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. N.C. Gen.Stat. § 96-15(i) ; Housecalls Nursing Servs., Inc. v. … Morrison, 305 N.C. 373 , 376, 289 S.E.2d 357 , 359 (1982), and correctly held that the Board's conclusion was without merit. V. Conclusion We affirm superior court's award of unemployment benefits to the claimant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bring v. North Carolina State Bar

    126 N.C. App. 655 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1997

    This standard represents a guideline for the Board to follow in establishing rules for admission to the bar. In Bowens v. … Wilson v. Board of Governors, Washington State Bar Ass’n, 90 Wash. 2d 649, 652 , 585 P.2d 136, 139 (1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re CB Bladen Solar LLC

    262 N.C. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2018

    Harrison v. Guilford Cty. , 218 N.C. 718 , 721, 12 S.E.2d 269 , 272 (1940) (citations omitted). … Seminary, Inc. v. Wake Cty. , 251 N.C. 775 , 782, 112 S.E.2d 528 , 533 (1960) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Little

    56 N.C. App. 765 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1982

    State v. Siler, 292 N.C. 543 , 234 S.E. 2d 733 (1977). In State v. … The judge responded thereto with a curative instruction very similar to that in Brown . Based upon Brown and the principles noted above, we find no prejudicial error in the trial judge’s charge to the jury.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Union Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer, Ret. Sys. Div.

    817 S.E.2d 919 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

    Stat. § 135-5 (a3) (2017) was "void and of no effect because the [Board of Trustees of TSERS (the 'Board') ] did not follow the rule making procedures of ... the Administrative Procedure Act [ (the 'APA').]" 2 Director Toole … Ellis, but also initiated this action, as indicated above, to challenge the validity of the cap factor "adopted" by the Board. Additional facts may be found in Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Gamez

    264 N.C. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 2019

    Nether Reyes nor Brown was aware of who Gamez left with. 21. After interviewing Gamez, Reyes and Brown then interviewed Blackett. 22. … We observed that the defendant had not voluntarily subjected himself to questioning by Brown in that the defendant “could not, while he was being questioned, leave Brown’s office without Brown’s permission,” and that Brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Chavis

    15 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1972

    In State v. Caviness, 7 N.C. … In State v. Powell, 10 N.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pryor v. Coulter

    17 S.C.L. 517 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1830

    In White v. Cuyler, 6 T. R. 176, Lord Kenyon said, that “ in executing a deed for the principal, under a power of attorney, the proper way is to sign the name of the principal.” In Wilks v. … denoted that the sealing and delivery were for James Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Cash

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2020

    Rawson and Colin Shive, for Appellee Granville County Board of Education. … “Board”) motion for sanctions.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re SMS

    196 N.C. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2009

    In re Heil, 145 N.C.App. 24, 28 , 550 S.E.2d 815, 819 (2001) (quoting State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95, 98 , 261 S.E.2d 114, 117 (1980)). … State v. Marcoplos, 154 N.C.App. 581, 582-83 , 572 S.E.2d 820, 821-22 (2002), aff'd and remanded, 357 N.C. 245 , 580 S.E.2d 691 (2003); see also State v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Haugh v. County of Durham

    208 N.C. App. 304 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 2010

    On or about 12 March 2007, the Durham County Board of Commissioners (the “Board”) approved entering into an agreement with Nitronex to provide up to $100,000.00 from the Durham County Economic Development Investment Fund … Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989) (citing Sanitary District v. Lenoir, 249 N.C. 96 , 105 S.E.2d 411 (1958); Hayes v. Wilmington, 243 N.C. 525 , 91 S.E.2d 673 (1956)). See also Azar v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Martin

    38 N.C. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1978

    State v. Cooper, 286 N.C. 549 , 213 S.E. 2d 305 (1975). The defendant, on 14 October 1977, filed a motion to suppress evidence of statements by the defendant to Bernice Dalton and Everett Brown. … The defendant contends the court should have conducted a voir dire examination to determine whether the admissions to Dalton and Brown were freely and voluntarily made.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. McClain

    86 N.C. App. 219 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1987

    State v. … State v. Tucker, 317 N.C. 532, 536-40 , 346 S.E. 2d 417, 420-22 (1986); State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237, 246-49 , 321 S.E. 2d 856, 861-63 (1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Long v. Currituck Cnty.

    248 N.C. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2016

    and can freely substitute its judgment for that of the board. … See Surplus Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.