Case law

McDowell v. Randolph Cty.

808 S.E.2d 513 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 2017

(quoting Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410, 233 S.E.2d 538, 541 (1977)). Defendant-Board reached its decision to rezone the Subject Property by granting the Lumber Company’s modified site plan. … MCDOWELL V.

Collins v. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance

39 N.C. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1978

Johnson v. Insurance Co., 201 N.C. 362 , 160 S.E. 454 (1931); Smith v. Insurance Co., 193 N.C. 446 , 137 S.E. 310 (1927). … The only case we have found comparable to the case at bar is Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Brown, 53 Tenn. App. 240 , 381 S.W. 2d 573, 577 (Tenn. App., E.S. 1964), cert. denied by Supreme Court, 15 July 1964.

Watson v. Dixon

130 N.C. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1998

See Denning-Boyles v. WCES, Inc., 123 N.C. App. 409 , 473 S.E.2d 38 (1996); Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 93 N.C. … Brown, 93 N.C. App. at 437 , 378 S.E.2d at 236 (citing Carolina Equip. *54 Co. v. Anders, 265 N.C. 393 , 144 S.E.2d 252 (1965)).

Meares v. Town of Beaufort

193 N.C. App. 49 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 2008

“This extraordinary remedy is not a proper instrument to review or reverse an administrative board which has taken final action on a matter within its jurisdiction.” Snow v. … See Robins v. Town of Hillsborough, 361 N.C. 193, 198 , 639 S.E.2d 421, 424 (2007) (“a [town board] conducting a quasi-judicial hearing can dispense with no essential element of a fair trial.

State v. Revels

250 N.C. App. 754 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2016

A series of unanimous resolutions were approved at the meeting including that (1) RST operations would be transferred to the company's headquarters at 1300 South Dekalb Street in Shelby, North Carolina; (2) Doug Brown ("Brown … See State v.

State v. Burgess

1 N.C. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 27, 1968

The Supreme Court said in State v. … See also State v. Greer, 270 N.C. 143 , 153 S.E. 2d 849 .

State v. Evans

166 N.C. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 2004

See State v. … In State v.

Scotland County Department of Social Services ex rel. Powell v. Powell

155 N.C. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002

N.C.G.S. § 50-13.4(c); see Browne v. Browne, 101 N.C. App. 617, 623 , 400 S.E.2d 736, 740 (1991). … See Gowing v. Gowing, 111 N.C. App. 613, 617 , 432 S.E.2d 911, 913 (1993); Browne, 101 N.C. App. at 624 , 400 S.E.2d at 741 . *537 In Guilford County ex rel. Easter v.

State v. Chavis

15 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1972

In State v. Caviness, 7 N.C. … In State v. Powell, 10 N.C.

State v. Teague

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2022

STATE V. … Thus, the brown material is not within the Industrial Hemp Act’s  STATE V.

Fox v. Lenoir-Rhyne Univ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 3, 2024

Plaintiffs Laney Fox, Nakia Hooks, Ashley Woodroffe, Michaela Dixon, Sydney Wilson, Tamerah Brown, Kennedy Weigt, and Korbin Tipton (“plaintiffs-athletes”)  FOX V. … See Estate of Graham v.

State v. Largent

197 N.C. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2009

In Re Proposed Assessments v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., 161 N.C. App. 558, 559-60 , 589 S.E.2d 179, 180-81 (2003) (citations and quotation marks omitted). … Begley v. Employment Sec. Comm., 50 N.C. App. 432, 436 , 274 S.E.2d 370, 373 (1981) (citations omitted).

Barrett v. Hyldburg

127 N.C. App. 95 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1997

Brown v. Brown, 77 N.C. … See Brown, 77 N.C.

Donoho v. City of Asheville

153 N.C. App. 110 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 17, 2002

At this point, plaintiff and the Board conceded that the Title V permit fees were not at issue in this case and the trial court issued an order dismissing the Title V claim on 15 May 2001. … The inquiry addressed by [Board of Education v.

Durham Green Flea Mkt. v. City of Durham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 3, 2024

However, if a petitioner contends the board’s decision was based on an error of law, de novo review is proper. Lipinski v. Town of Summerfield, 230 N.C. … Where the petitioner alleges “‘the Board’s decision was based on an error of law, ‘de novo’ review is proper.’” Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen of Garner, 139 N.C.

Hayes v. Town of Fairmont

130 N.C. App. 125 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1998

the status of the ordinance, including when the ordinance would be voted on by the Board. … Board of Education, 47 N.C.

Pryor v. Coulter

17 S.C.L. 517 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1830

In White v. Cuyler, 6 T. R. 176, Lord Kenyon said, that “ in executing a deed for the principal, under a power of attorney, the proper way is to sign the name of the principal.” In Wilks v. … denoted that the sealing and delivery were for James Brown.

Demery v. Converse, Inc.

138 N.C. App. 243 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2000

Gilmore v. Board of Education, 222 N.C. 358 , 365, 23 S.E.2d 292, 296 (1942). … App. at 476 , 374 S.E.2d at 485 (quoting Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, 279 N.C. 132, 137 , 181 S.E.2d 588, 592 (1971)). . . . *250 Brown v. S & N Communications, Inc., 124 N.C.

Maness v. The Vill. of Pinehurst

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 2020

MANESS V. … The Board of Review did not make the necessary -2-  MANESS V.

Blevins v. Denny

114 N.C. App. 766 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 1994

We reach this conclusion in light of the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Mitchell v. … In support of our holding, we cite McNeill v.