Case law

Cardwell v. Smith

92 N.C. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 30, 1988

Cardwell v. Forsyth County Zoning Board of Adjustment, 88 N.C. App. 244 , 362 S.E. 2d 843 (1987), disc. rev. denied, 321 N.C. 742 , 366 S.E. 2d 858 (1988). … Harris v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co., 91 N.C. App. 147, 150 , 370 S.E. 2d 700, 702 (1988) (citation omitted).

N.C. Dep't of Envtl. Quality v. TRK Dev., LLC

259 N.C. App. 597 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 2018

App. 225, 573 S.E.2d 572 (2002), disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 62, 579 S.E.2d 387 (2003), and Fike v. Board of Trustees, 53 N.C. App. 78, 279 S.E.2d 910, disc. review denied, 304 N.C. 194, 285 S.E.2d 98 (1981). … Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc., 86 N.C. App. 157, 164, 356 S.E.2d 912, 916 (internal citations, quotation marks, and brackets omitted), disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 794, 361 S.E.2d 80 (1987).

Guilford County Planning & Development Department v. Simmons

115 N.C. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1994

It is well settled that collateral attacks on a decision of a Board of Adjustment are not permitted. See, e.g., Guilford County Planning & Dev. Dep’t v. Simmons, 102 N.C. … See, e.g., Sizemore v. Baxter, 58 N.C. App. 236 , 293 S.E.2d 294 , disc. *92 review denied, 306 N.C. 744 , 295 S.E.2d 480 (1982); Goldston v. Chambers, 272 N.C. 53 , 157 S.E.2d 676 (1967).

Ingram v. NC State Bd. of Plumbing, Heating

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2020

10 -  INGRAM V. … The Board is expressly authorized - 11 -  INGRAM V. N.C. STATE BD.

Herring v. COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.

529 S.E.2d 458 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2000

County Board of Education v. … See Overcash v. Statesville City Board of Education, 83 N.C.App. 21 , 348 S.E.2d 524 (1986); see also Beatty v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 99 N.C.App. 753 , 394 S.E.2d 242 (1990).

AR-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Anderson

5 N.C. App. 12 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 1969

In Builders Supply v. … Northen v. Elledge, 72 Ariz. 166 , 232 P. 2d 111 .

Greensboro Scuba Sch., LLC v. Robertson

242 N.C. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2015

Background Dawson is the principal operator and instructor at Greensboro Scuba, a dive shop located in Brown Summit, North Carolina. … Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427 , 428, 378 S.E.2d 778 , 779 (1989).

Allen v. Pullen

82 N.C. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1986

Summey v. Cauthen, 283 N.C. 640 , 197 S.E. 2d 549 (1973). … See White v.

State v. Teague

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2022

STATE V. … Thus, the brown material is not within the Industrial Hemp Act’s  STATE V.

Kurtz v. WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH CTY. BD. OF ED.

39 N.C. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 16, 1979

KURTZ, Petitioner, v. WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, and Omeda Brewer, Beaufort Bailey, Betsy Sawyer, Nancy Wooten, Davey B. Stallings, Tom C. … We hold that under Thompson v.

State v. Hosick

12 N.C. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 4, 1971

According to the minutes of the State Board of Health, MDA was not included in the registry of federally controlled drugs, and in this case the State relied upon the action of the State Board of Health to bring MDA under … Coastal Highway v. Turnpike Authority, 237 N.C. 52 , 74 S.E. 2d 310 (1953) ; 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Administrative Law, § 111, p. 910; 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Administrative Law, § 117, p. 923.

Battle v. Nash Technical College

103 N.C. App. 120 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1991

North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina Builders, 307 N.C. 563, 566 , 299 S.E.2d 629, 631 (1983). … Co. v. Chantos, 21 N.C. App. 129, 130 , 203 S.E.2d 421, 423 (1974).

In re S.M.S.

196 N.C. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2009

App. 24, 28 , 550 S.E.2d 815, 819 (2001) (quoting State v. … App. 579, 582-83 , 660 S.E.2d 653, 656 (2008); see also In re Brown, 150 N.C.

MNC Holdings, LLC v. Town of Matthews

223 N.C. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2012

The superior court reviews a board of adjustment’s interpretation of a municipal ordinance de novo. Morris Comm. Corp. v. City of Bessemer, 365 N.C. 152, 155 , 712 S.E.2d 868, 871 (2011). … See Hopkins v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 111 N.C.

Shannon v. Testen

243 N.C. App. 386 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2015

Hancock v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kan., Inc., 21 F.3d 373, 375 (10th Cir. 1994); see also Bok v. Mut. Assurance, Inc., 119 F.3d 927, 928 (11th Cir. 1997) (per curiam); Wayne v. Genesis Med. … See Craig v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 363 N.C. 334, 339, 678 S.E.2d 351, 355 (2009); Copper v.

VESTER CARLISLE v. Nash/Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ.

124 N.C. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1996

The Nash/Rocky Mount Board of Education purchased liability insurance from the North Carolina School Boards Insurance Trust, Agreement #92/93-EOGL-640. … However, this Court in Beatty v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education, 99 N.C.

Doe v. Fulton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 2026

Because “[a] local board of education may incur liability . . . only with respect to a claim arising after such board of education has procured liability insurance . . . and during the time when such insurance is in force … birthdays—we hold that the purported statute of repose cited by the Board does not apply.”

Gardner v. Richmond Cty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 2025

On 8 September 2020, the Richmond County Planning Board met to consider CSX’s rezoning application and “unanimously voted to recommend approval to the County” Board of Commissioners, the entity responsible for granting … The Board of Commissioners reconvened on 8 October 2020 to vote on CSX’s rezoning application.

Herring Ex Rel. Marshall v. Liner

163 N.C. App. 534 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 2004

A county or city board of education is a governmental agency and its employees are not ordinarily liable in a tort action unless the board has waived its sovereign immunity. Id. N.C. Gen. … . § 115C-42 (2003) provides the only means by which a board of education may waive its sovereign immunity. Lucas v. Swain Cty. Bd. of Educ., 154 N.C. App. 357, 361 , 573 S.E.2d 538, 541 (2002).

Mazzeo v. City of Charlotte

235 N.C. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2014

First Union Nat'l Bank v. Ingold, 136 N.C. App. 262, 264, 523 S.E.2d 725, 727 (1999). … Koufman v.