Case law

Bowman v. Cox Toyota Scion

224 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2012

Crisp, a board-certified pain management specialist. Dr. Crisp noted that Plaintiff had severe muscle spasms. According to Dr. … ‘Strictly speaking, the rules of evidence applicable in our general courts do not govern the Commission’s own administrative fact-finding.’ ” Brown v. Kroger Co., 169 N.C.

State v. Rawls

70 N.C. App. 230 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 1984

As indicated in State v. Jenkins, 8 N.C. … Citing State v.

State v. Stallings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 21, 2020

Brown. … Brown denied knowing - 15 -  STATE V.

Bynum Ex Rel. Boyette v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ.

195 N.C. App. 777 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2009

An action against a commission or board created by statute as an agency of the State where the interest or rights of the State are directly affected is in fact an action against the State. Meyer v. … Defendant is a local board of education as defined in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 11505 (5) (2007). N.C. Gen.

Se. Sureties Grp., Inc. v. Int'l Fid. Ins. Co.

244 N.C. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2015

(“the Board”). … V. INT’L FID. INS. CO.

Town of Belhaven v. Pantego Creek, LLC

250 N.C. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2016

(“Community Board”). … Belhaven breached the Mediation Agreement when the Community Board was unable to legally - 12 -  TOWN OF BELHAVEN, NC V.

State v. Sutton

34 N.C. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1977

State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117, 123 , 191 S.E. 2d 659, 663 (1972). … State v. Brown, supra. Defendant also assigns as error the denial of his motion to sever the offense that occurred on 21 October 1975 from trial with the offenses that took place 16 October 1975.

Greensboro Scuba Sch., LLC v. Robertson

242 N.C. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2015

Background Dawson is the principal operator and instructor at Greensboro Scuba, a dive shop located in Brown Summit, North Carolina. … Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427 , 428, 378 S.E.2d 778 , 779 (1989).

Williams v. Williams

105 N.C. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1992

Browne v. Browne, 101 N.C. App. 617, 624 , 400 S.E.2d 736, 740 (1991).

Stevens v. Stevens

68 N.C. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 1984

Dillon v. Funding Corp., 291 N.C. 674 , 231 S.E. 2d 629 (1977); Russell v. Tenore, 55 N.C. App. 84 , 284 S.E. 2d 521 (1981). … See Brown v. Brown, 47 N.C. App. 323 , 267 S.E. 2d 345 (1980). (This case involved a claim for alimony, but the same reasoning applies to child support cases.)

Sack v. North Carolina State University

155 N.C. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002

Dept. of Correction v. McNeely, 135 N.C. App. 587, 592 , 521 S.E.2d 730, 733 (1999) (quoting Thompson v. … McDonald’s Corp. v. Dwyer, 338 N.C. 445, 447 , 450 S.E.2d 888, 890 (1994) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 33 L. Ed.2d 548 (1972)).

In re Thompson Arthur Paving Co.

81 N.C. App. 645 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1986

Smith v. Hefner, 235 N.C. 1 , 68 S.E. 2d 783 (1952); Mattox v. State, 21 N.C. App. 677 , 205 S.E. 2d 364 (1974). … See In re Huyck Corp. v. Mangum, Inc., 309 N.C. 788 , 309 S.E. 2d 183 (1983).

State v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 2024

State v. Brown Defendant also cites State v. Brown, wherein a defendant had waived an indictment for a charge of armed robbery, but not to the charge of accessory after the fact of armed robbery. State v. … Brown is not controlling. Id. c. State v. Futrelle Defendant also cites State v.

Mathias v. Brumsey

27 N.C. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1975

Citing Brown v. … However, the general rule as stated in Cutts v. Casey, supra, and Brown v. Hodges, supra, does not require a mechanical and technical application that defeats the purpose of the rule.

LAUREL PARK VILLAS HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. Hodges

82 N.C. App. 141 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1986

State v. Jones, 67 N.C. App. 377 , 313 S.E. 2d 808 (1984). Where the legislature has specifically designated certain statutory procedures, it has by implication excluded other procedures. See Campbell v. … However, a provision of the bylaws indicates that all powers of the corporation shall be exercised by the board of directors, and allows the board to designate officers.

Guilford County Planning & Development Department v. Simmons

115 N.C. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1994

It is well settled that collateral attacks on a decision of a Board of Adjustment are not permitted. See, e.g., Guilford County Planning & Dev. Dep’t v. Simmons, 102 N.C. … See, e.g., Sizemore v. Baxter, 58 N.C. App. 236 , 293 S.E.2d 294 , disc. *92 review denied, 306 N.C. 744 , 295 S.E.2d 480 (1982); Goldston v. Chambers, 272 N.C. 53 , 157 S.E.2d 676 (1967).

MacOn County v. Town of Highlands

187 N.C. App. 752 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2007

Woolard v. Davenport, 166 N.C. App. 129, 135 , 601 S.E.2d 319, 323 (2004) (quoting Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc., 351 N.C. 331, 337 , 525 S.E.2d 441, 445 (2000)) (additional citation omitted). … The County relies on County of Johnston v. City of Wilson, 136 N.C. App. 775 , 525 S.E.2d 826 (2000), and Orange County v. Dept. of Transportation, 46 N.C. App. 350 , 265 S.E.2d 890 (1980), to support its position.

Hyde v. Taylor

70 N.C. App. 523 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1984

Brown v. Kirkpatrick, 217 N.C. 486 , 8 S.E. 2d 601 (1940). … See also Barnaby v. Boardman, 70 N.C. App. 299 , 318 S.E. 2d 907 (1984); Blanton v. Sisk, 70 N.C. App. 70 , 318 S.E. 2d 560 (1984).

State v. McCall

12 N.C. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 4, 1971

G.S. 15-152; State v. Hamilton, 264 N.C. 277 , 141 S.E. 2d 506 (1965) ; State v. Walker, 6 N.C. App. 447 , 170 S.E. 2d 627 (1969). See also, State v. Blackburn, 6 N.C. App. 510 , 170 S.E. 2d 501 (1969). … In support of their assignment of error defendants rely principally on State v. Brown, 263 N.C. 786 , 140 S.E. 2d 413 (1965) and State v. Miller, 271 N.C. 646 , 157 S.E. 2d 335 (1967).

Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem

61 N.C. App. 682 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1983

D & W, Inc. v. Charlotte, 268 N.C. 720, 722 , 152 S.E. 2d 199, 202 (1966). … For the trial court to have ordered the Board to accept the Porsh bid, as Porsh requested in its motion, would have impermissibly enlarged upon *688 the mandate directed by the Supreme Court in this case. D & W, Inc. v.