Case law

State v. Thobourne

59 N.C. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1982

pound bags of marijuana; a green carrying case with a large plastic bag of “green vegetable material;” plastic bags; a set of scales, and small brown envelopes. … See Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 539 , 68 S.Ct. 248 , 92 L.Ed. 154 (1947).

INS. CO. OF N. AMER. v. Aetna Life & Cas.

362 S.E.2d 836 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1987

See Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Land, supra . … See Belasco v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 73 N.C.App. 413 , 326 S.E.2d 109 , disc. rev. denied, 313 N.C. 596 , 332 S.E.2d 177 (1985); Engle v.

Johnson v. Starboard Ass'n, Inc.

244 N.C. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 5, 2016

See Ron Medlin Constr. v. … See, e.g., Armstrong v.

State v. Davis

124 N.C. App. 93 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1996

In State v. … Moreover, in State v.

State v. Gibson

32 N.C. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1977

Spinelli v. U. S., 393 U.S. 410 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 637 , 89 S.Ct. 584 (1968); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 12 L.Ed. 2d 723 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 (1964); State v. … State v. Ellington, 284 N.C. 198 , 200 S.E. 2d 177 (1973); State v. Caldwell, 25 N.C. App. 269 , 212 S.E. 2d 669 (1975); State v. Brown, 20 N.C.

Hursey v. Town of Gibsonville

18 N.C. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1973

This principle was succinctly stated in Cheek v. … State v. Greenwood, 280 N.C. 651 , 187 S.E. 2d 8 ; Cheek v. City of Charlotte, supra; State v. Smith, 265 N.C. 173 , 143 S.E. 2d 293 ; State v. Glidden Co., 228 N.C. 664 , 46 S.E. 2d 860 .

State v. Whitley

213 N.C. App. 630 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2011

State v. … State v. Chambers, 52 N.C. App. 713, 721 , 280 S.E.2d 175, 180 (1981).

Britt v. Britt

49 N.C. App. 463 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1980

Brown v. Board of Education, 269 N.C. 667, 153 S.E. 2d 335 (1967); Durland v. Peters, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 42 N.C. App. 25 , 255 S.E. 2d 650 (1979); In re Vinson, 42 N.C. App. 28 , 255 S.E. 2d 644 (1979). … In Bunn v.

In re Thompson Arthur Paving Co.

81 N.C. App. 645 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1986

Smith v. Hefner, 235 N.C. 1 , 68 S.E. 2d 783 (1952); Mattox v. State, 21 N.C. App. 677 , 205 S.E. 2d 364 (1974). … See In re Huyck Corp. v. Mangum, Inc., 309 N.C. 788 , 309 S.E. 2d 183 (1983).

RANDOLPH M. JAMES, PC v. Lemmons

177 N.C. App. 509 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 16, 2006

Daves-Brown, one of the firm’s paralegals. When Ms. Daves-Brown attempted to discuss the relationship with Claimant, Claimant became defensive and difficult to talk to. … James, Sue James, and Suzanne Daves-Brown. On 13 October 2004, Mr.

State v. Allen

45 N.C. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1980

Accord, State v. McLawhorn, 43 N.C. App. 695 , 260 S.E. 2d 138 (1979). … See State v. Boyd, 278 N.C. 682 , 180 S.E. 2d 794 (1971).

Budd v. Davie County

116 N.C. App. 168 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1994

.); Concerned, Citizens of Downtown Asheville v. Board of Adjustment of Asheville, 94 N.C. … See Chrismon v.

State v. Christie

96 N.C. App. 178 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1989

Like our defendant, Rembert argued that he was seized at the bus terminal when officers boarded a bus upon which he was a passenger. The court found that the boarding was entirely consensual, citing INS v. … Third, a seizure did not occur because the officers’ boarding the bus was not more intrusive than necessary. In United States v.

Carter v. Hucks-Folliss

131 N.C. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1998

Blanton v. Moses H. Cone Hosp., 319 N.C. 372, 376 , 354 S.E.2d 455, 458 (1987). … Corp. v. Cape Fear Constr. Co., 313 N.C. 488, 491 , 329 S.E.2d 350, 353 (1985).

LAUREL PARK VILLAS HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. Hodges

82 N.C. App. 141 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1986

State v. Jones, 67 N.C. App. 377 , 313 S.E. 2d 808 (1984). Where the legislature has specifically designated certain statutory procedures, it has by implication excluded other procedures. See Campbell v. … However, a provision of the bylaws indicates that all powers of the corporation shall be exercised by the board of directors, and allows the board to designate officers.

Cole v. Bonaparte'S Retreat Prop. Owners' Ass'n, Inc.

815 S.E.2d 403 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2018

The sale was stymied, however, because the board of directors discovered it was without requisite authority under BRIPOA’s -6-  COLE V. … Stat. § 160A-388(a1) (2017) (permitting boards of adjustment to issue zoning variances by quasi-judicial proceeding) and Hillsboro Partners, LLC, v. City of Fayetteville, 226 N.C.

Alderman v. Chatham County

89 N.C. App. 610 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1988

Blades v. City of Raleigh, 280 N.C. 531, 549 , 187 S.E. 2d 35, 45 (1972). … Willis v. Union County, 77 N.C. App. 407, 409, 335 S.E. 2d 76, 77 (1985).

Fogle v. GASTON CTY. BD. OF ED.

29 N.C. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 14, 1976

Rogers v. Davis, 212 N.C. 35 , 192 S.E. 872 (1937). … State v. Camp, 286 N.C. 148 , 209 S.E.2d 754 (1974).

Hasty v. Bellamy

44 N.C. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1979

Since the power to hire teachers rests in the school board, G.S. 115-21; Johnson v. … If the latter were proved to be the case, no violation of G.S. 115-142(m)(2) would be established, since the superintendent is entitled to make such recommendations, see G.S. 115-21; G.S. 115-142(m)(2); Taylor v.

Piney Mountain Neighborhood Ass'n v. Town of Chapel Hill

63 N.C. App. 244 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1983

Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 469 , 202 S.E. 2d 129, 136 (1974). … See Kenan v. Board of Adjustment, 13 N.C.