Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

0.39s

  • Matter of Browning

    124 N.C. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1996

    On 14 February 1995, a report of abuse was made to the Davie County Department of Social Services concerning Tommy Browning, the juvenile son of respondent Bobby Daniel Browning. … Shay with Tommy Browning and his juvenile brother, Robert Browning, the investigation was expanded to include Robert Browning. After Ms.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benton v. W. H. Weaver Construction Co.

    34 N.C. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1977

    Holland v. *428 Malpass, 266 N.C. 750 , 147 S.E. 2d 234 (1966). … See, Deaton v. Eton College, 226 N.C. 433 , 38 S.E. 2d 561 (1946).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Alston v. Monk

    92 N.C. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1988

    Additionally, to be licensed they must pass an examination administered by the State Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners. … Hinson v. Brown, 80 N.C. App. 661 , 343 S.E. 2d 284 , disc. rev. denied and appeal dismissed, 318 N.C. 282 , 348 S.E. 2d 138 (1986). This assignment of error is overruled.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. McQueen

    165 N.C. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2004

    State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). The test for sufficiency of the evidence is the same regardless of whether the evidence is circumstantial or direct. State v. … See State v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Town of Matthews v. Wright

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 21, 2015

    Based on the decision of this Court in Wright I, the trial court vacated its order, and remanded the case back to the Zoning Board. Town of Matthews v. Wright, 194 N.C. App. 552, 553, 669 S.E.2d 841, 842 (2008). … At a subsequent hearing on 10 August 2006, the Zoning Board determined “the issue of Implied Dedication was no longer an issue.” Id. B. Town of Matthews v. Wright (“Wright II”), 194 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ferebee v. Hardison

    126 N.C. App. 230 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1997

    The trial court took immediate action to instruct the jury that they were not to consider this portion of Lieutenant Brown’s testimony, and the court specifically found that this testimony by Brown was not an intentional … See Lloyd v. Bowen, 170 N.C. 216 , 86 S.E. 797 (1915); Roberts v. Young, 120 N.C. App. 720 , 464 S.E.2d 78 (1995). In accordance with the rule set forth in Dickens v.

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Ferebee v. Hardison, 347 N.C. 346 (1997)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Tolson

    166 N.C. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004

    The hearing before the Review Board was held on 15 August 2001. The Board rendered a decision affirming the Assistant Secretary's decision on 9 November 2001. … See, e.g., Reap v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Wilkins

    131 N.C. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1998

    After the mock trial, Public Defender Robert Brown advised defendant that he believed she would be found *222 guilty at trial and receive the maximum sentence. … A hearing on the motion was held on 9 December 1996, at which time Judge Hudson heard testimony from defendant and her employers as well as from Hughes and Brown.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State v. Wright

    206 N.C. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 2010

    In Henry v. … In State v. Ward, 354 N.C. 231, 243 , 555 S.E.2d 251, 260 (2001) (quoting State v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Green

    2 N.C. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 14, 1968

    Defendant contends State v. … This was clearly “the use or threatened use” of a firearm whereby the life of Mollie Brown was endangered or threatened, the offense charged in the indictment and a violation of G.S. 14-87.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bynum Ex Rel. Boyette v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ.

    195 N.C. App. 777 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2009

    An action against a commission or board created by statute as an agency of the State where the interest or rights of the State are directly affected is in fact an action against the State. Meyer v. … Defendant is a local board of education as defined in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 11505 (5) (2007). N.C. Gen.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • HEMPHILL NOLAN v. Town of Weddington

    153 N.C. App. 144 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 17, 2002

    Prac. 19; State v. Hamrick, 110 N.C. … See White Oak Properties, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Woolard v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

    93 N.C. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1989

    , the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bundy v. Board of Education, 5 N.C. App. 397 , 168 S.E. 2d 682 (1969).

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • State v. Davis

    126 N.C. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1997

    See U.S. v. … See Craig v. Buncombe Co. Board of Education, 80 N.C. App. 683, 684-85 , 343 S.E.2d 222, 223 (1986). Important, if not essential, nonpunitive purposes are served by administrative suspension and expulsion.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Blair Investments, LLC v. Roanoke Rapids City Council

    231 N.C. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2013

    Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 623 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 381 (1980) (quoting Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 467 , 202 S.E. 2d 129, 135 (1974) (other citation omitted). … Howard at 246 , 558 S.E.2d at 227 (citing Gregory v. County of Harnett, 128 N.C. App. 161, 165 , 493 S.E.2d 786, 789 (1997), quoting Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen of Town of Garner, 139 N.C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Matter of Stradford

    119 N.C. App. 654 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 1995

    As part of the investigation' Officer Browning interviewed defendant; Officer Browning testified that she asked defendant if he was playing around with A. and B., “and he replied the boys were playing with [A. and B.] by … Defendant cites State v. Moss, 332 N.C. 65, 73-74 , 418 S.E.2d 213, 218 (1992) (quoting State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Blue Ridge Co., LLC v. Town of Pineville

    188 N.C. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2008

    Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 (1980). N.C. Gen. … V.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Protest of Atchison

    192 N.C. App. 708 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 2008

    North Carolina Sav. & Loan League v. N.C. Credit Union Comm., 302 N.C. 458, 466 , 276 S.E.2d 404, 410 (1981). … Houston v. Town of Chapel Hill, 177 N.C. App. 739, 743 , 630 S.E.2d 249, 253 (2006) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boulware v. The Univ. of N.C. Bd. of Governors

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2023

    Board Chair Harris and the original board attorney did not participate -5- BOULWARE V. THE UNIV. OF N.C. BD. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re License as a Practicing Psychologist of Partin

    37 N.C. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 1978

    Ramsey v. Veterans Commission, 261 N.C. 645 , 135 S.E. 2d 659 (1964). … Ramsey v. Veterans Commission, supra at 647, 135 S.E. 2d at 661 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.