Case law

In Re Guess

95 N.C. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1989

From these findings the Board concluded that Dr. … ,” State v.

In re Election of Cleveland County Commissioners

56 N.C. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1982

State v. McMorris, 290 N.C. 286 , 225 S.E. 2d 553 (1976). … See Green v. Briggs, 243 N.C. 745 , 92 S.E. 2d 149 (1956); Penland v. Town of Bryson City, 199 N.C. 140 , 154 S.E. 88 (1930); Riddle v. Cumberland County, 180 N.C. 321 , 104 S.E. 662 (1920); Starbuck v.

McFarland by McFarland v. Pitt Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

265 N.C. App. 382 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2019

We agree with Defendant Board, and therefore dismiss the instant appeal. Discussion "As a general rule, there is no right of appeal from an interlocutory order." Edwards v. Foley , --- N.C. … DKH Corp. v.

Mims v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2020

Brown, Crump, Vanore & Tierney, L.L.P., by Andrew A. Vanore, III, for defendants-appellees. HAMPSON, Judge. … Is determined by the person or Board designated by the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control to be potentially dangerous because the dog has engaged in one or more of the

State v. Jones

172 N.C. App. 161 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2005

In Fowler v. … V. Conclusion Defendant is a local “ABC Board” employee charged with embezzlement under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-92 . The appropriate statute to charge a local “ABC Board” employee is N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-90 .

Taylor v. City of Lenoir

148 N.C. App. 269 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2002

Buckhannon Home v. West Va. … In Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v.

Stealth Properties v. Town of Pinebluff

183 N.C. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2007

Harding v. Board of Adjust. of Davie County, 170 N.C.App. 392 , 395, 612 S.E.2d 431 , 434-35 (2005) (internal quotations and citations omitted). … MCC Outdoor, LLC v. Town of Franklinton Bd. of Comm'rs, 169 N.C.App. 809 , 811, 610 S.E.2d 794 , 796 (2005) (quoting Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 470-71, 202 S.E.2d 129 , 137 (1974)).

State v. Davis

126 N.C. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1997

See U.S. v. … See Craig v. Buncombe Co. Board of Education, 80 N.C. App. 683, 684-85 , 343 S.E.2d 222, 223 (1986). Important, if not essential, nonpunitive purposes are served by administrative suspension and expulsion.

Correll v. Boulware

74 N.C. App. 631 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 1985

Thompson v. Board of Education, supra. In applying the whole record test, the court must take into account evidence in the record which conflicts with or detracts from the board’s decision. Id. … In Parrish v. Real Estate Licensing Board, 41 N.C.

Gray v. Allen

197 N.C. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 2009

Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd., 358 N.C. 440, 458 , 597 S.E.2d 674, 686 (2004); State v. Wilson, 183 N.C. … See, e.g., Jackson v.

Parker v. New Hanover County

173 N.C. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2005

Gwathmey v. State, 342 N.C. 287, 298 , 464 S.E.2d 674 , *653 681 (1995). … Rohrer v. Credle, 322 N.C. 522, 527 , 369 S.E.2d 825, 828 (1988).

Blair Investments, LLC v. Roanoke Rapids City Council

231 N.C. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2013

Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 623 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 381 (1980) (quoting Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 467 , 202 S.E. 2d 129, 135 (1974) (other citation omitted). … Howard at 246 , 558 S.E.2d at 227 (citing Gregory v. County of Harnett, 128 N.C. App. 161, 165 , 493 S.E.2d 786, 789 (1997), quoting Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen of Town of Garner, 139 N.C.

SPRINGDALE ESTATES ASS'N v. Wake County

47 N.C. App. 462 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1980

General, 291 N.C. 451 , 232 S.E. 2d 184 (1977); Accord State v. Camp, 286 N.C. 148 , 209 S.E. 2d 754 (1974); Underwood v. Howland, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 274 N.C. 473 , 164 S.E. 2d 2 (1968); Wake County v. … But when the findings of the board are not based on competent evidence, the proceedings must be remanded. See Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 469 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974); Jarrell v.

Stephens v. City of Hendersonville

128 N.C. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1997

See Arlington Heights v. Metro. Housing Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 265 , 50 L. Ed. 2d 450, 464 (1977); Brown v. Town of Davidson, 113 N.C. App. 553, 555 , 439 S.E.2d 206, 207 (1994). … Ed. 2d at 464 ; Brown, id.

State v. McQueen

165 N.C. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2004

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). The test for sufficiency of the evidence is the same regardless of whether the evidence is circumstantial or direct. State v. … See State v.

Matter of Browning

124 N.C. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1996

On 14 February 1995, a report of abuse was made to the Davie County Department of Social Services concerning Tommy Browning, the juvenile son of respondent Bobby Daniel Browning. … Shay with Tommy Browning and his juvenile brother, Robert Browning, the investigation was expanded to include Robert Browning. After Ms.

Benton v. W. H. Weaver Construction Co.

34 N.C. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1977

Holland v. *428 Malpass, 266 N.C. 750 , 147 S.E. 2d 234 (1966). … See, Deaton v. Eton College, 226 N.C. 433 , 38 S.E. 2d 561 (1946).

Batch v. Town of Chapel Hill

92 N.C. App. 601 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1989

But when the findings of the board are not based on competent evidence, the proceedings must be remanded. Id., citing Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 469 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974); Jarrell v. … See Hylton Enterprises v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Va. 435 , 258 S.E. 2d 577 (1979).

Williams v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Sch. Bd. of Educ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 17, 2023

TA-29098 JERMOND WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. … The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Board of Education (the “Board”) appeals from the North Carolina Industrial Commission’s (the “Commission’s”) denial of the Board’s motion for summary judgment.

State v. Clinding

92 N.C. App. 555 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1989

State v. Odom, 316 N.C. 306 , 341 S.E. 2d 332 (1986); State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237 , 321 S.E. 2d 856 (1984). However, we find the error nonprejudicial. We find Brown and Odom distinguishable from the instant case. … We find that this fact clearly distinguishes our case from Brown and Odom .