Case law

State v. Messick

159 N.C. App. 232 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2003

No evidence was presented indicating defendant and Jack Brown acted in concert for a common criminal purpose. The majority cites two factually distinguishable cases, State v. … In the case sub judice, there is no evidence of a conspiracy or agreement between Jack Brown and defendant. [1] Accordingly, if the jury determined Jack Brown's actions were unforeseeable and that Jack Brown was the sole

Paynter v. Maggiolo

105 N.C. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1992

In so holding the Blanton Court stated that its decision was a reaffirmation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Kirkpatrick, 217 N.C. 486 , 8 S.E.2d 601 (1940). … The reasoning of Brown was rejected expressly by our Supreme Court in Barnaby v. Boardman, 313 N.C. 565 , 330 S.E.2d 600 (1985).

Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc.

142 N.C. App. 216 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 20, 2001

unsafe manner); Brown, 45 N.C. … See, e.g., Brown, supra. In Brown , this Court acknowledged that a plaintiff is not per se contributorily negligent if he contacts an energized power line. Brown, 45 N.C. App. at 390 , 263 S.E.2d at 370 .

State v. Jones

216 N.C. App. 225 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 4, 2011

Upon his arrest, defendant declined to give a statement, but he informed Investigator Council that on 8 September 2008, he was with a friend named Xavier Brown (“Brown”). … Investigator Council later questioned Brown, and Brown confirmed that he and defendant had been together on that day.

Taylor v. City of Lenoir

148 N.C. App. 269 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2002

Buckhannon Home v. West Va. … In Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v.

State v. Lemus

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2020

STATE V. … The school board appealed the denial of its sanctions motion to this Court, but the Court rejected the board’s arguments and affirmed the trial court’s order. State v. Lemus, __ N.C.

In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Adams

204 N.C. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 2010

Stat. § 45-21.16 (d) (2009); In re Foreclosure of Brown, 156 N.C. … See In re Foreclosure of Brown, 156 N.C.

North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Paschal

231 N.C. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2014

Whitehead”), located at 398 Browns Crossroads (“Browns Crossroads house”). … As pointed out by this court in Fonvielle v.

Boyce v. Boyce

60 N.C. App. 685 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1983

(Emphasis added.) 277 N.C. at 102-03 , 176 S.E. 2d at 166 ; accord Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435 , 204 S.E. 2d 534 (1974). … Under the rule of Sutton v. Duke, supra and Brown v. Brown, supra the petition is clearly without merit and was properly dismissed on motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Affirmed.

State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating Bureau

29 N.C. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1976

Commissioners v. Commissioners, 186 N.C. 202 , 119 S.E. 206 (1923). As above noted, G.S. 58-27.2 (a) was enacted in 1949, while G.S. 58-131.1 was enacted in 1945. … Comr. of Insurance v. Automobile Rate Office, 29 N.C. App. 182 , 223 S.E. 2d *247 512 (filed 7 April 1976) ; Comr. of Insurance v. Rating Bureau, 28 N.C. App. 409 , 221 S.E. 2d 96 (1976).

Emanuelson v. Gibbs

49 N.C. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1980

While defendants’ offer in this case is unmistakable, they question the effectiveness of the acceptance by the Board of County Commissioners. As stated in Owens v. … This rule is articulated in Owens v.

West ex rel. Farris v. Tilley

120 N.C. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1995

Brown v. Lyons, 93 N.C. App. 453, 458 , 378 S.E.2d 243, 246 (1989) (citing Flippin v. Jarrell, 301 N.C. 108 , 270 S.E.2d 482 (1980), reh’g denied, 301 N.C. 727 , 274 S.E.2d 228 (1981)). … Lea Co. v. N.C. Board of Transportation, 323 N.C. 691, 694-95 , 374 S.E.2d 868, 870 (1989).

In Re Lustgarten

177 N.C. App. 663 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2006

Dep’t of Env’t & Natural Res. v. Carroll, 358 N.C. 649, 660 , 599 S.E.2d 888, 895 (2004) (quoting Watkins v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam’rs, 358 N.C. 190, 199 , 593 S.E.2d 764, 769 (2004) and N.C. Gen. … Walker v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 100 N.C. App. 498, 502 , 397 S.E.2d 350, 354 (1990), disc. review denied, 328 N.C. 98 , 402 S.E.2d 430 (1991).

State v. Coats

100 N.C. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1990

United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682 , 87 L. Ed. 2d 481, 494 , 105 S. Ct. 3375, 3383 (1985). By that standard Ms. Brown’s opinion is not material. … Brown’s statement does not meet the requirements of that section. See State v. Sprinkle, 46 N.C. App. 802, 805 , 266 S.E.2d 375, 377 , disc. review denied, 300 N.C. 561 , 270 S.E.2d 115 (1980).

Buchele v. Pinehurst Surgical Clinic, P.A.

80 N.C. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1986

Chew v. Leonard, 228 N.C. 181 , 44 S.E. 2d 869 (1947). … See Wilson v. Duplin Telephone Co., 139 N.C. 395 , 52 S.E. 62 (1905); cf. Hurdle v. White, 34 N.C.

85' & Sunny

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2021

Respondent argues that the Board correctly concluded that both  85’ AND SUNNY, LLC V. … LLC V.

Huang v. Ziko

132 N.C. App. 358 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 1999

Plaintiff appealed to defendant University’s Board of Trustees and, then, to defendant Board. Defendant Board ultimately affirmed the Board of Trustees’ decision on 9 February 1990. … See Kolani v. Gluska, 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 257 (1998); Roden v. Wright, 611 So. 2d 333 (Ala. 1992).

Stealth Properties v. Town of Pinebluff

183 N.C. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2007

Harding v. Board of Adjust. of Davie County, 170 N.C.App. 392 , 395, 612 S.E.2d 431 , 434-35 (2005) (internal quotations and citations omitted). … MCC Outdoor, LLC v. Town of Franklinton Bd. of Comm'rs, 169 N.C.App. 809 , 811, 610 S.E.2d 794 , 796 (2005) (quoting Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 470-71, 202 S.E.2d 129 , 137 (1974)).

In re Election of Cleveland County Commissioners

56 N.C. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1982

State v. McMorris, 290 N.C. 286 , 225 S.E. 2d 553 (1976). … See Green v. Briggs, 243 N.C. 745 , 92 S.E. 2d 149 (1956); Penland v. Town of Bryson City, 199 N.C. 140 , 154 S.E. 88 (1930); Riddle v. Cumberland County, 180 N.C. 321 , 104 S.E. 662 (1920); Starbuck v.

The Umstead Coal. v. RDU Airport Auth.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2020

V. RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTH. Opinion of the Court Special Meeting of the Board, via email, to be held on 1 March 2019. … Veazey v.