Case law

Robinson v. FOREST CREEK LTD. PARTNERSHIP

213 N.C. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2011

See Rodman v. … See Mims v.

Flack v. Garriss

58 N.C. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1982

State v. Rose

170 N.C. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 2005

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357, 361 , 99 S. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 51 , 61 L. Ed. 2d at 362 , 99 S.

White v. Crisp

138 N.C. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2000

In Crossman v. … Furthermore, in Meyer v.

Tucker Chase, LLC v. Town of Midland

825 S.E.2d 276 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 2019

In reviewing the decision of a Board of Adjustment, a superior court sits in the "posture of an appellate court" and "may not consider a matter not addressed by the Board[.]" Tate Terrace Realty Inv'rs, Inc. v. … See Forsyth Cty. v. Shelton , 74 N.C.

Long Props., LLC v. City of Trinity

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 2026

LONG PROPS., LLC V. … V.

Parker v. New Hanover County

173 N.C. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2005

Gwathmey v. State, 342 N.C. 287, 298 , 464 S.E.2d 674 , *653 681 (1995). … Rohrer v. Credle, 322 N.C. 522, 527 , 369 S.E.2d 825, 828 (1988).

Spoon v. Spoon

233 N.C. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2014

As such, Defendant, citing Tucker v. … Evans v. Evans, 138 N.C. App. 135, 140, 530 S.E.2d 576, 579 (2000); see Harrington v. Harrington, 16 N.C.

City of Asheville v. Huskey

204 N.C. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 18, 2010

Harris v. NCNB, 85 N.C. App. 669, 670 , 355 S.E.2d 838, 840 (1987); see also Burgin v. Owen, 181 N.C. … This means that the court must hear or try the case on its merits from beginning to end as if no trial or hearing had been held by the Board and without any presumption in favor of the Board's decision. Warren v.

Shelton v. Morehead Memorial Hospital

76 N.C. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 1985

Cameron v. New Hanover Mem. Hosp., 58 N.C. App. 414 , 293 S.E. 2d 901 , appeal dismissed; cert. denied, 307 N.C. 127 , 297 S.E. 2d 399 (1982). … Defendants contend that the Board of Trustees at Morehead Memorial *258 Hospital functions like a Medical Review Committee and therefore proceedings of the Board are privileged pursuant to G.S. 131E-95.

Stone v. State

191 N.C. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2008

See Municipality of Anchorage v. Gallion, 944 P.2d 436 (Alaska 1997); Dadisman v. Moore, 384 S.E.2d 816 (W. Va. 1989); Valdes v. Cory, 189 Cal. Rptr. 212 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983); Sgaglione v. … Levitt, 337 N.E.2d 592 (N.Y. 1975); Weaver v. Evans, 495 P.2d 639 (Wash. 1972); Dombrowski v. City of Philadelphia, 245 A.2d 238 (Pa. 1968); State Teachers’ Retirement Board v. Giessel, 106 N.W.2d 301 (Wis. 1960). B.

State v. Rosser

54 N.C. App. 660 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1981

State v. Brown, 36 N.C. App. 152 , 242 S.E. 2d 890 (1978); State v. Shufford, 34 N.C. App. 115 , 237 S.E. 2d 481 , cert. denied 293 N.C. 592 , 239 S.E. 2d 265 (1977); State v. Best, 31 N.C. … State v. Brown, supra at 153; State v. Cameron, 283 N.C. 191 , 195 S.E. 2d 481 (1973); State v. Yelverton, 18 N.C. App. 337 , 196 S.E. 2d 551 , cert. denied 283 N.C. 670 , 197 S.E. 2d 880 (1973).

Barr-Mullin, Inc. v. Browning

108 N.C. App. 590 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1993

Q-CO Industries, Inc. v. Hoffman, 625 F.Supp. at 617 . Defendants next argue the COMPU-RIP software was not a trade secret since defendant Browning rediscovered the COMPU-RIP source code by means of reverse engineering. … Here, a prima facie case of misappropriation exists since defendant Browning helped to develop the COMPU-RIP software during his employ with plaintiff and Browning had access to copies of the COMPU-RIP source code prior to

Gibbs v. Mayo

162 N.C. App. 549 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 2004

Our Supreme Court in Insulation Co. v. … V.

State v. Crawford

29 N.C. App. 117 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1976

State v. Brown, 263 N.C. 786 , 140 S.E. 2d 413 (1965). … State v. Eppley, 282 N.C. 249, 259 , 192 S.E. 2d 441, 448 (1972) ; State v. Miller, 271 N.C. 646 , 157 S.E. 2d 335 (1967) ; State v. Brown, supra.

State v. Davis

92 N.C. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1989

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 589 (1984). … State v.

Williams v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Sch. Bd. of Educ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 20, 2024

TA-29098 JERMOND WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. … On 15 August 2022, the Board timely appealed to this Court. On 17 October 2023, we issued an opinion, Williams v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Board of Education, ___ N.C.

Ayers v. Currituck Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2024

The [DSS] Board agrees with my decision to terminate your employment. … Brown v. Fayetteville State Univ., 269 N.C. App. 122, 130 (2020) (emphasis added) (marks omitted).

Matter of Freeman

109 N.C. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 1993

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 223 , 76 L. Ed. 2d 527, 538-39 (1983). … In State v. Carter, the Court rejected the “cost-benefit” test of the federal exclusionary rule as “simplistic” and not suited to the resolution of the issue. State v.

Correll v. Boulware

74 N.C. App. 631 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 1985

Thompson v. Board of Education, supra. In applying the whole record test, the court must take into account evidence in the record which conflicts with or detracts from the board’s decision. Id. … In Parrish v. Real Estate Licensing Board, 41 N.C.