Case law

Anderson v. SeaScape at Holden Plantation, LLC

241 N.C. App. 191 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 2015

Brown, Shareholder Derivative Litigation and the Special Litigation Committee, 43 U. PITT. L. REV. . 601, 644 (1982). … Co., Inc. v.

Hawkins v. Webster

78 N.C. App. 589 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 1985

Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435 , 204 S.E. 2d 534 (1974). We apply these principles to each of the claims advanced by Hawkins in his complaint. … The Supreme Court in Henry v.

Ragland v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. Of Educ.

247 N.C. App. 738 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016

In reviewing administrative proceedings like those conducted by school boards, the trial court acts as an appellate court and may not substitute its judgment for that of a school board. See, e.g., Rector v. N.C. … RAGLAND V.

Meherrin Indian Tribe v. Lewis

197 N.C. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 2009

Defendants’ appeal from denial of Rule 12(b)(2) motion In Teachy v. … Anderson v. Town of Andrews, 127 N.C. App. 599, 601 , 492 S.E.2d 385, 386 (1997) (citing EEE-ZZZ Lay Drain Co. v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 108 N.C.

Raleigh Place Associates v. City of Raleigh

95 N.C. App. 217 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1989

State v. Lee, 277 N.C. 242 , 176 S.E.2d 772 (1970). The Lee rule, like other rules of statutory construction, is applicable to the construction of municipal ordinances. Cogdell v. … Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107, 109 , 37 S.E.2d 128, 131 (1946).

Izydore v. City of Durham

779 S.E.2d 527 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2015

Williams v. Greene

36 N.C. App. 80 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1978

New Times, Inc. v. Arizona Board of Regents, 20 Ariz. App. 422 , 513 P. 2d 960 (1973), vacated on other grounds, 110 Ariz. 367 , 519 P. 2d 169 (1974); Brown v. Pitchess, 13 Cal. 3d 518 , 119 Cal. … Huggins v. Board of Education, 272 N.C. 33 , 157 S.E. 2d 703 (1967). See also D. Dobbs, Remedies § 2.10, at 108-9 (1973); J. Leubsdorf, The Standard for Preliminary Injunctions, 91 Harv. L. Rev. 525 (1978).

Trivette v. Yount

217 N.C. App. 477 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2011

Brown v. Motor Inns of Carolina, Inc., 47 N.C. App. 115, 118 , 266 S.E.2d 848, 849 (1980). … We note it is well established that both a principal and the teachers under the principal’s supervision are considered employees of the local school board. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115 -325C et seq. (2009); Taylor v.

Childress v. Yadkin County

186 N.C. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2007

Burcham, Delmer Simmons, Ronald Childress, Kenneth Vestal, and Paul Brown (“plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Jerry Bryant (“Bryant”) and Yadkin County (“the County”). 1 This case … When a zoning board is acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, however, it is required to make findings of fact. See Devaney v. City of Burlington, 143 N.C.

State v. Tarantino

86 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 1987

See Texas v. Brown, supra, and United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 , 71 L.Ed. 1202 , 47 S.Ct. 746 (1927). There are, however, important factual differences between Dunn and the present case. … The front of Dunn’s barn was “essentially open”; Tarantino had boarded all of his windows and doors.

Chastain v. Arndt

253 N.C. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2017

Meyer v. Walls, 347 N.C. 97, 110, 489 S.E.2d 880, 887 (1997) (citing Anita R. Brown-Graham & Jeffrey S. Koeze, Immunity from Personal Liability under State Law for Public Officials and Employees: An Update, Loc. … V. Conclusion When sued in his official capacity, Defendant is entitled to the same sovereign immunity as Gaston College and its Board of Trustees.

Robins v. Town of Hillsborough

176 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 2006

V. … Browning-Ferris Industries v. Guilford County Bd. of Adj., 126 N.C.App. 168, 171 , 484 S.E.2d 411, 414 (1997).

Sandy Mush Properties, Inc. v. Rutherford County Ex Rel. Rutherford County Board of Commissioners

187 N.C. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2007

Sandy Mush Props., Inc. v. Rutherford Cty., 361 N.C. 569 , 651 S.E.2d 566 (2007). … In Robins , our Supreme Court held that “when the applicable rules and ordinances are not followed by a town board, the applicant is entitled to have his application reviewed under the ordinances and procedural rules in effect

Smith v. Keator

21 N.C. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1974

Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness, 373 U.S. 96, 102-03 (1963) ; Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238-39 (1957) ; Goldsmith v. … Co. v.- Corporation Comm’n, 286 U.S. 210, 234 (1932) ; accord, State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 : Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 .

Sanco of Wilmington Service Corp. v. New Hanover County

166 N.C. App. 471 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 2004

“If a petitioner contends the Board’s decision was based on an error of law, de novo review is proper.” Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 140 N.C. … See Guilford Financial Services, LLC v. The City of Brevard, 150 N.C.

In Re the Appeal of General Tire, Inc.

102 N.C. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1991

. § 150B-51 (1987); Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E.2d 538 (1977). … In re Browning, 51 N.C. App. 161 , 275 S.E.2d 520 (1981) (appeal from decision of the Employment Security Commission); Fisher v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours, 54 N.C.

Pelc v. Pham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 2025

Brown v. Brown, 171 N.C. App. 358, 361, 615 S.E.2d 39, 41 (2005) (quoting Hildebrand v. Vanderbilt, 147 N.C. 639, 642, 61 S.E. 620, 621 (1908)). … Brown, 171 - 11 -  PELC V. PHAM Opinion of the Court N.C.

Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. Cooper

153 N.C. App. 25 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 17, 2002

See Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 255, 261 , 393 S.E.2d 134, 137 , disc. review denied, 327 N.C. 426 , 395 S.E.2d 675 (1990). … See McKimm v.

Azar v. Town of Indian Trail Bd. of Adjustment

257 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2017

AZAR V. … Appellant cites MYC Klepper/Brandon Knolls L.L.C. v. The Board of Adjust.

Higdon v. Davis

71 N.C. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1984

Board of Aldermen, 212 N.C. 185 , 193 S.E. 153 (1937). *648 Plaintiff argues that the prescriptive period for acquiring title to an easement is judge-made law and the correct prescriptive period is 20 years. Speight v. … Hemphill v. Board of Aldermen, supra. *653 This rule contemplates a definite and specific line to which the user of the easement is confined.