Case law

State v. . McKenzie

166 N.C. 290 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1914

S. v. Dixon, 131 N. C., 812 ; Patterson v. Mills, 121 N. C., 268 ; Merrill v. Whitmore, 110 N. C., 367 ; Walker v. Scott, 106 N. C., 56 . … In S. v. Boggan, supra, Connor, J., also cites Justice Ashe in S. v. Gould, 90 N.

Peltz v. . Burgess

196 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1928

Brown v. Buchanan, 194 N. C., 675 ; Pace v. McAden, 191 N. C., 137 ; Corbett v. Hawes, 187 N. C., 653 ; Tripp v. Little, 186 N. C., 215 ; Randolph v. Roberts, ibid., 621; Hoge v. Lee, 184 N. C., 44 . … It was held in Bland v. Beasley, 140 N. C., 629 , that a period of seventeen years was not comparatively remote, and in Hoge v. Lee, supra, that a period of five or six years was insufficient.

Penland v. . Gowan

229 N.C. 449 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1948

For that reason, the appeal is dismissed on authority of Eller v. Wall, ante, 359, and the cases there cited. Appeal dismissed.

Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Smitherman

178 N.C. 595 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1919

Bank v. Hay, 143 N. C., 326 ; Brittain v. Westall, 135 N. C., 492 ; Metal Co. v. R. R., 145 N. C., 293 . … Johnson v. Ins. Co., 172 N. C., 142 , citing Smith v. R. R., 68 N. C., 115 ; Rumhough v. Improvement Co., 112 N. C., 751 ; Morgan v. Benefit Society, 167 N. C., 265 .

Mebane v. . Layton

86 N.C. 571 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1882

In Bank v. Harris, 84 N. … In Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 John., Ch. 139. Chancellor Kent ruled that different creditors might unite in one bill, the object of which was to set aside a fraudulent conveyance of their common debtor.

Sams v. . Cochran

188 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1924

The case of Robertson v. Lumber Co. , 165 N.C. p. 4 , was written by Brown, J . … Veneer Co. , 169 N.C. p. 494 , Brown, J. , said: "The parties may, however, substitute a special contract for this contract implied by law.

Bank of Spruce Pine v. Boone Fork Manufacturing Co.

186 N.C. 744 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1923

Bank v. Ins., Co., 159 N. C., 200 . *746 Plaintiff failed to lay any proper basis for its admission. Rumbough v. Imp. Co., 112 N. C., 751 ; 31 Cyc., 1644. … Brown, J., in Younce v. Lbr. Co., 155 N. C., 239 . It nowhere appears that these statements, attributed to W. S.

In Re W. P. Rose Builders Supply Co.

202 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1932

E., 183 ; MacRae v. Fayetteville, 198 N. C., 51 , 150 S. E., 628 , .and others of like import. … The Texas Court in Terry et al. v.

Alford v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

202 N.C. 719 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 18, 1932

See' Brown v. R. R., ante, 256; Bruce v. Stutz Motor Co., 148 N. E., 161 ; American Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton, 135 S. E., 21 . … Blade v. Power Co., 158 N. C., 468 , 74 S. E., 468 . Modified and affirmed.

State v. . Pressley

90 N.C. 730 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

It differs from it only in the fact that the clerks did not “ board ” with their employer. In this respect it also differs from the case of State v. Outlaw, 72 N. C., 598 . This is not a material fact. … State v. Wilson, 1 Hay., 243 ; State v. Jenkins, 5 Jones, 430 ; State v. Jake, supra; State v. Outlaw, supra; State v. Potts, 75 N. C., 129 ; State v. Davis, 77 N. C., 490 .

Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-Salem

243 N.C. 316 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1956

Culbreth v. Britt, 231 N.C. 76 , 56 S.E. 2d 15 , and cases cited. See also Duke v. Campbell, 233 N.C. 262 , 63 S.E. 2d 555 ; In re Hall, 235 N.C. 697 , 71 S.E. 2d 140 , and cases cited. Also James v. … Moreover, in Cameron v.

Whitaker v. Gilliam

125 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1899

Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 ; Arrington v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 156 . A party recovers a tract of land in the Superior Court. … (Herndon v. Insurance Co., 111 N. C., 384 ;Horton v. Green, 104 N.

Morris v. Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance

131 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 28, 1902

Wyche v. Ross, 119 N. C., 174 ; Cowles v. Cowles, 121 N. C., 272 . The discretionary power only exists when excusable neglect has been shown. Stith v. Jones, 119 N. C., at page 341 ; Brown v. Hale, 93 N. … In DePriest v. Patterson, 85 N.

Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.

220 N.C. 155 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1941

E., 706 ; New berry v. Fertilizer Co., 202 N. C., 416 , 163 S. E., 116 ; Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 25 , 167 S. E., 409 ; Fenner v. Cedar Works, 191 N. C., 207 , 131 S. E., 625 ; Timber Co. v. Ins. Co., 190 N. … Bost v. Metcalfe, supra; Rucker v. Snider Bros., supra.

Thomas v. . R. R.

131 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1902

In Capehart v. R. R. , 81 N.C. at p. 444; 31 Am. Rep., 505 , Ashe, J. , citing Smith v. R. R. , 64 N.C. 235 , and Glenn v. R. … To same purport, Wood v. R. R. , 118 N.C. at p. 1063; Brown v. Tel. Co. , 111 N.C. at p. 191; 32 Am.

State v. . McKay

150 N.C. 813 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1909

Brown, J. A careful review of - the record in this case discloses no just ground for awarding to the.prisoner another trial. Exception 1. … State v. Booker, 123 N. C., 713 ; State v. Adams, 136 N. C., 617 . Exceptions 4 and 5.

Bank v. Commissioners

135 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1904

The Court upon the foregoing state of facts ordered and adjudged that the defendant Board of Commissioners and W. L. George, chairman of said board, and V. B. … In People v. Supervisors, 68 N. Y., 114 , the language of the statute was “that the said board may in their discretion cause the tax to be levied.”

Malloy v. . McNair

49 N.C. 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1857

In Simpson v. King, 11 Ire. … This distinguishes it from Simpson v. King, and from Lea v. Brown, 3 Jones’ Eq. 140.

Cecil v. City of High Point

165 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1914

Brevard Light and Power Co. v. Board of Light and Water Commissioners of Concord, 151 N. C., 558 ; Jones v. Statesville, 97 N. C., 86 ; Steele v. Commissioners of Rutherford, 70 N. C., 137 ; Jones v. … Mayor and City of Nashville v. Webb, 114 Tenn., 432 ; Board of Directors v. Bodkins Bros., 108 Tenn., 700 ; Oil City v. McAbuy, 74 Pa. St., 249; Backwoods & Co. v.

Jones v. . Schull

153 N.C. 517 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1910

It was competent to sbow tbat the land in controversy bad not been listed by the owners for the-tax years 1893 and 1894, and tbat the chairman of the board of commissioners bad inserted in the list such property as bad not … Woodly v. Bond, 66 N. C., 396 ; S. v. Littlefield, 93 N. C., 614 ; Green v. Asheville, 114 N. C., 678 ; Lowe v. Harris, 112 N. C., 472 ; Morrison v. McDonald, 113 N. C., 327 .