Case law

State v. Brown

306 N.C. 151 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 1982

Brown testified that he was in Moore County jail as a prisoner at the time defendant was placed in the jail. Brown asked defendant what he was charged with and defendant said that he was charged with a double homicide. … Here the trial court obviously deemed Brown’s testimony to be relevant and to have probative value.

State v. . Brown

113 N.C. 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893

State v. Cowan, 29 N. C., 239, 250 . … State v. Harris, 106 N. C., 682, 687 . No Error.

State v. Brown

315 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1985

The Brown decision, however, did not address specific allegations of illegality nor premise its ruling on those grounds. … State v. Bullard, 312 N.C. 129 , 322 S.E. 2d 370 (1984); State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982).

Brumble v. . Brown

71 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Haughton v. Leary, 3 D. & B., 21. And if not barred by the statute at that time, it does not become so after-wards during the pending of the action. Walker v. Clements, 15 A. & E.; N. S., 1046; 69 E. C. L. R.

Brown v. . Foust

64 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1870

Treasury notes, at the time of the verdict: Garrett v. Smith, ante 93.

State v. Brown

253 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1960

The principles of law applied by this Court in State v. Wilson, 216 N.C. 130 , 4 S.E. 2d 440 , are controlling on this appeal. … State v. Wilson, supra. ■ *197 The judgment of July 1960 recites that the court heard evidence “of the State and the defendant.”

Brown v. . Coble

76 N.C. 391 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1877

There is no allegation that the payment was fraudulently made as in Dockery v. French, 73 N. C. 420 . 2. … It is in. a certain County, on a certain stream and is that piece of land of which John Brown died seized and possessed.

State v. Brown

320 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

See State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 180 , 293 S.E. 2d 569, 588 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982). … Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (victims stabbed repeatedly, then disemboweled); State v.

State v. Brown

300 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1980

Appeal of Defendant Brown Defendant Brown first assigns as error the denial of his motion to sever the charged offenses. … State v. Scott, supra.

Mitchell v. . Brown

88 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

The answer admits the defendant to be in possession of a part only of the land embraced in the plaintiff’s boundaries, and, denying his title thereto, avers the same to belong to his father, *157 Henry Brown, who let him … Is the land in controversy in this action, and no other, the same that was in controversy in the action of Henry Brown against Moses Mitchell, Gabriel Mitchell, Mexico Mitchell and Doctor Mitchell, tried at fall term, 1874

Ashley v. . Brown

198 N.C. 369 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1930

Ed., 1149 ; Wilkinson v. Wright, 1 N. C., 422 ; Peace v. Nailing, 16 N. C., 289, 296 ; Merwin v. Ballard, 66 N. C., 398 ; Greer v. Asheville, 114 N. C., 678 ; Mann v. Allen, 171 N. C., 219 ; Waddill v. Masten, 172 N. … See Poti v. N. E. Road Machinery Co., 140 Vt., 587 ; S. v. Johnston, 79 N. J. L., 49, 74 At., 538 ; Kane v. State, 81 N. J. L., 594, 80 At., 453 ; Kane v. New Jersey, 242 U. S., 160 , 62 L. Ed., 222 .

Spencer v. . Brown

214 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1938

Williams v. Coach Co., 197 N. C., 12 , 147 S. E., 435 , and cases cited. … Williams v. Coach Co., supra; Comr. of Banks v. Mills, 202 N. C., 509 , 163 S. E., 598 ; S. v. Bryant, 213 N. C., 752 , 197 S. E., 530 .

Roulhac v. . Brown

87 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1882

Peebles v. Foote, 83 N. C., 102 . … Sanderson v. Daily, 83 N. C., 67 ; Mabry v. Henry, 83 N. C., 298 . A case in point is State v. Evans, 74 N. C., 324 , where a prisoner was-put in jail for larceny, and the jury not being able to agree were discharged.

State v. . Brown

206 N.C. 747 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1934

At the March Term, 1934, Forsyth Superior Court, the defendant herein, J ames Brown, was tried upon an indictment charging him with burglary in the first degree, C. … S. v. Goldston, 201 N. C., 89 , 158 S. E., 926 . No error appears on the face of the record. S. v. Edney, 202 N. C., 706 , 164 S. E., 23 ; S. v. Hamlet, ante, 568. Appeal dismissed.

Brown v. . Dail

117 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

Foster v. Hackett, 112 N. C., 516 ; Watson v. Smith, 110 N. C., 6 ; Wright v. Brown, 116 N. C., 26 ; Taylor v. Smith, Ibid, 531; McDonald v. McDonald, 5 Jones Eq., 211 ; Mastin v. Marlow, 65 N. C., 695 ; Bodenhamer v. … , or to ship to other markets in the name of Brown as consignor.

Bailey v. . Brown

105 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Cross v. Williams, 91 N. C, 496; Avery v. Pritchard, 93 N. C., 266 ; Rollins v. Love, 97 N. C., 210 . The appellant is the moving party. … Justice v. Eddings, 75 N. C., 581 , and Lambert v. Kinnery, 74 N. C., 348 .

State v. Brown

266 N.C. 55 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1965

Yates told him that Brown approached him about selling him an adding machine.” … S. v. Maslin, supra. In the case of S. v.

Freeman v. . Brown

151 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1909

C., 487 ; *114 Davis v. Thornburg, 149 N. C., 233 ; Griffin v. Railroad, 123 N. C., 55 ; Jennings v. Hinton, 128 N. C., 214 ; Collins v. Collins, 125 N. C., 98 . … Bryan v. Malloy, 90 N. C., 508 ; Stewart v. Register, 108 N. C., 588 ; Mabe v. Mabe, 122 N. C., 552 .

State v. . Brown

82 N.C. 585 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1880

State v. … State v. Wilson, Phil., 337.

Brown v. Durham.

141 N.C. 249 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1906

Hoice, J., after stating the case: The right of the plaintiff to recover on the facts set ont in the case on appeal is fully sustained by the principles announced in Bunch v. Edenton, 90 N. C., 431 , and Fitzgerald v. … Russell v. Railroad, 118 N. C., 1098 ; Ramsbottom v. Railroad, 138 N. C., 38 .