Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.44s
Halyburton v. . Greenlee and Flemming
72 N.C. 316 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875
Woodly v. Gilliam, 64 N. C. 649 . … Lathrop v. Brown, 23, Iowa 40. The holder of the elder lien, may at any time during the life of his lien, sell the land previously sold under a junior judgment.
Cited 5 timesPublished154 N.C. 177 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1910
That said club has a manager who stays at said club-rooms most all his time, and also has a president and board of directors and treasurer. … St., 706, and note by the editor, Judge Freeman; Nelson v. Brown , 44 Iowa 455 ; Irons v. Kentner , 51 Iowa 88 ; 33 Am. Rep., 119 . In Sturm v.
Cited 17 timesPublished196 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1928
Brown v. R. R., 165 N. C., at p. 396; Barcliff v. R. R., 168 N. C., 268 ; Eller v. Greensboro, 190 N. C., at p. 720. Taking the charge as a whole, and not disconnectedly, we think there is no reversible error. … Morrow v. Mills, 181 N. C., 423 ; Langley v. Hosiery Mills, 194 N. C., 644 . As to tbe right to take private property for public purposes, a different rule prevails. Mitchell v. Ahoskie, 190 N. C., 235 ; Eller v.
Cited 10 timesPublished206 N.C. 104 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1934
Rouse v. Wooten, 140 N. C., 557 , 53 S. E., 430 ; Brown v. Turner, 202 N. C., 227 , 162 S. E., 608 . She is not entitled on these facts to a foreclosure of tbe deed of trust by judgment or decree in this action. … For this reason, Mortgage Co. v. Long, 205 N. C., 533 , is not applicable to this case. There is no error in tbe order denying defendants’ motion for removal of tbe action. Tbe order is Affirmed.
Cited 7 timesPublished303 N.C. 500 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 8, 1981
Smith described the pistol as black with a brown handle. After her discussion with defendant Ms. Smith drove to McDonald’s Cafeteria and saw the deceased lying on the ground face down, bleeding from her mouth. … Accord, State v. Daniels, 300 N.C. 105 , 265 S.E. 2d 217 (1980); State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95 , 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980); State v. Blizzard, 280 N.C. 11 , 184 S.E. 2d 851 (1971); State v.
Cited 105 timesPublished21 N.C. 475 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1837
The plaintiff says, indeed, that she might have made a counter demand, of equal or larger amount, but that she would not, nor did not- If the board of the children were not meant from the beginning to be gratuitous, a point … There are however many adjudications; and among them is the case of Howell v. Hooks, 2 Dev. Eq. 258 , directly in point. Per Curiam. . Bill dismissed with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublished133 N.C. 616 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1903
This Court, in Scarborough v. Robinson, 81 N. … Rex v. Arundel, Hobart, 109, 111 Trinity Term, 14 Jac.; Broadnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 . The law in consonance with this doctrine is strongly and clearly stated by Chief Justice Beasley in Pangborn v. Young, 32 N. J.
Cited 13 timesPublishedSouthern Spruce Co. v. Hunnicutt
166 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914
In Withrell v. Murphy, 154 N. C., 89 , Justice Manning, quoting from 1 Enc. … Blanton v. Bostic, 126 N. C., 421 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedKerner v. Southern Railway Co.
170 N.C. 94 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1915
BRowN, J. Tbe action is brought to recover damages for tbe destruction of tbe plaintiff’s factory in the town of Kernersville 15 April, 1912. … Albright v. Mitchell, 70 N. C., 445 ; Kirk v. Railway, 97 N. C., 82 .
Cited 20 timesPublished240 N.C. 788 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1954
In S. v. … See also Parker v. Brown, 136 N.C. 280 , 48 S.E. 657 . And in Tucker v.
Cited 3 timesPublished85 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1881
Schehan v. Malone, 71 N. C., 440 ; Brumble v. Brown Ib. 513. … Co. v. Richardson, 82 N. C., 343 . 2.
Cited 7 timesPublished141 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1906
*Page 210 Cited: Morrow v. R. R. , 147 N.C. 627 ; Allen v. R. R. , 149 N.C. 260 ; Hammett v. R. R. , 157 N.C. 324 ; Shepherd v. R. R. , 163 N.C. 520 ; Hill v. R. R. , 166 N.C. 597 ; McNeill v. R. … R. , 167 N.C. 399 ; Horne v. R. R. , 170 N.C. 648 , 661 ; Horton v. R. R. , 175 N.C. 484 . (248)
Cited 6 timesPublished203 N.C. 709 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1932
Kidder v. Bailey, 187 N. C., 505 ; Gordon v. Ehringhaus, 190 N. C., 147 ; McCullen v. Daughtry, 190 N. C., 215 ; Mangum v. Trust Co., 195 N. C., 469. … S., 4164, 4165; Brown v. Hamilton, 135 N. C., 10 . The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.
Cited 14 timesPublished186 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1923
C., 678 ; Brown v. Myers, 150 N. C., 443 ; Davidson v. Shuler, 119 N. C., 582 . In Wiseman v. Green, 127 N. … Again, in bead-note 5, Mizell v. Simmons, 79 N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSmithfield Improvement Co. v. Coley-Bardin
156 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1911
By the common law the lessor is under no implied covenant to rep'air, or even that the premises shall be fit for the purpose for which they are rented. 3 Kent Com., 465; Brown Leg. Max. (3 Ed.), 213-214; Fowler v. … Bank v. Newton, 76 N. Y., 616 .
Cited 15 timesPublished218 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1940
Witnesses who were at tbe wreck 10 or 15 minutes after tbe collision said tbe Ford was torn all to pieces and tbat Andrew Freeman was under tbe floor boards dead. Tbe left wheel was off. … Queen v. Ins. Co., 177 N. C., 34 .” Batchelor v. R. R., 196 N. C., 84 ; Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 217 N. C., 368 (371).
Cited 27 timesPublishedJarrett v. High Point Trunk & Bag Co.
144 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1907
Brown, J. … State v. Austin, 79 N. C., 626 ; Burton v. Railroad, 84 N. C., 197 ; Bynum v. Bynum, 33 N. C., 636 ; State v. Wolf, 122 N. C., 1081 .
Cited 44 timesPublished260 N.C. 765 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1963
“After the filing -of a .complaint in any action, for divorce, whether from the bonds -of matrimony or from bed and board, both before and after final judgment therein, it is lawful for the judge ... to make .such orders … G.S. 50-13; Griffin v. Griffin, 237 N.C. 404 , 75 S.E. 2d 133 .
Cited 13 timesPublished204 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933
Tillery v. Lumber Co., 172 N. C., 296 ; Marks v. McLeod, 203 N. C., at p. 258-9. … Board of Education v. Greenville, 132 N. C., 4 ; Dockery v. Hamlet, 162 N. C., 118 . The pipe payment is of no avail to plaintiff as plaintiff presented no claim under the statute. Abbott Realty Co. v. Charlotte, 198 N.
Cited 3 timesPublished204 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1933
Lineberger v. Phillips, 198 N. C., 661 , 153 S. E., 118 ; Washburn v. Biggerstaff, 195 N. C., 624 , 143 S. E., 210 ; Barbee v. Thompson, 194 N. C., 411 , 139 S. E., 838 . … C., 586 ; Francks v. Whitaker, 116 N. C., 518 ; Chewning v. Mason, 158 N. C., 579 ; Dunn v. Hines, 164 N. C., 114 ; Taylor v. Brown, 165 N. C., 157 ; McCallum v. McCallum, 167 N. C., 310 . Tbe case of Hauser v.
Cited 22 timesPublished
Ask Donna