Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.44s

  • Halyburton v. . Greenlee and Flemming

    72 N.C. 316 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

    Woodly v. Gilliam, 64 N. C. 649 . … Lathrop v. Brown, 23, Iowa 40. The holder of the elder lien, may at any time during the life of his lien, sell the land previously sold under a junior judgment.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. . Colonial Club

    154 N.C. 177 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1910

    That said club has a manager who stays at said club-rooms most all his time, and also has a president and board of directors and treasurer. … St., 706, and note by the editor, Judge Freeman; Nelson v. Brown , 44 Iowa 455 ; Irons v. Kentner , 51 Iowa 88 ; 33 Am. Rep., 119 . In Sturm v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Winchester v. . Byers

    196 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1928

    Brown v. R. R., 165 N. C., at p. 396; Barcliff v. R. R., 168 N. C., 268 ; Eller v. Greensboro, 190 N. C., at p. 720. Taking the charge as a whole, and not disconnectedly, we think there is no reversible error. … Morrow v. Mills, 181 N. C., 423 ; Langley v. Hosiery Mills, 194 N. C., 644 . As to tbe right to take private property for public purposes, a different rule prevails. Mitchell v. Ahoskie, 190 N. C., 235 ; Eller v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • White v. . Rankin

    206 N.C. 104 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1934

    Rouse v. Wooten, 140 N. C., 557 , 53 S. E., 430 ; Brown v. Turner, 202 N. C., 227 , 162 S. E., 608 . She is not entitled on these facts to a foreclosure of tbe deed of trust by judgment or decree in this action. … For this reason, Mortgage Co. v. Long, 205 N. C., 533 , is not applicable to this case. There is no error in tbe order denying defendants’ motion for removal of tbe action. Tbe order is Affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Jones

    303 N.C. 500 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 8, 1981

    Smith described the pistol as black with a brown handle. After her discussion with defendant Ms. Smith drove to McDonald’s Cafeteria and saw the deceased lying on the ground face down, bleeding from her mouth. … Accord, State v. Daniels, 300 N.C. 105 , 265 S.E. 2d 217 (1980); State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95 , 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980); State v. Blizzard, 280 N.C. 11 , 184 S.E. 2d 851 (1971); State v.

    Cited 105 timesPublished
  • Geddy v. . Stainback

    21 N.C. 475 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1837

    The plaintiff says, indeed, that she might have made a counter demand, of equal or larger amount, but that she would not, nor did not- If the board of the children were not meant from the beginning to be gratuitous, a point … There are however many adjudications; and among them is the case of Howell v. Hooks, 2 Dev. Eq. 258 , directly in point. Per Curiam. . Bill dismissed with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Markley.

    133 N.C. 616 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1903

    This Court, in Scarborough v. Robinson, 81 N. … Rex v. Arundel, Hobart, 109, 111 Trinity Term, 14 Jac.; Broadnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 . The law in consonance with this doctrine is strongly and clearly stated by Chief Justice Beasley in Pangborn v. Young, 32 N. J.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Southern Spruce Co. v. Hunnicutt

    166 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

    In Withrell v. Murphy, 154 N. C., 89 , Justice Manning, quoting from 1 Enc. … Blanton v. Bostic, 126 N. C., 421 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kerner v. Southern Railway Co.

    170 N.C. 94 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1915

    BRowN, J. Tbe action is brought to recover damages for tbe destruction of tbe plaintiff’s factory in the town of Kernersville 15 April, 1912. … Albright v. Mitchell, 70 N. C., 445 ; Kirk v. Railway, 97 N. C., 82 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Moss v. Hicks

    240 N.C. 788 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1954

    In S. v. … See also Parker v. Brown, 136 N.C. 280 , 48 S.E. 657 . And in Tucker v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McPeters v. . Ray

    85 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1881

    Schehan v. Malone, 71 N. C., 440 ; Brumble v. Brown Ib. 513. … Co. v. Richardson, 82 N. C., 343 . 2.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Heavener v. . R. R.

    141 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1906

    *Page 210 Cited: Morrow v. R. R. , 147 N.C. 627 ; Allen v. R. R. , 149 N.C. 260 ; Hammett v. R. R. , 157 N.C. 324 ; Shepherd v. R. R. , 163 N.C. 520 ; Hill v. R. R. , 166 N.C. 597 ; McNeill v. R. … R. , 167 N.C. 399 ; Horne v. R. R. , 170 N.C. 648 , 661 ; Horton v. R. R. , 175 N.C. 484 . (248)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. . York

    203 N.C. 709 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1932

    Kidder v. Bailey, 187 N. C., 505 ; Gordon v. Ehringhaus, 190 N. C., 147 ; McCullen v. Daughtry, 190 N. C., 215 ; Mangum v. Trust Co., 195 N. C., 469. … S., 4164, 4165; Brown v. Hamilton, 135 N. C., 10 . The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Elias v. . Arthur

    186 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1923

    C., 678 ; Brown v. Myers, 150 N. C., 443 ; Davidson v. Shuler, 119 N. C., 582 . In Wiseman v. Green, 127 N. … Again, in bead-note 5, Mizell v. Simmons, 79 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smithfield Improvement Co. v. Coley-Bardin

    156 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1911

    By the common law the lessor is under no implied covenant to rep'air, or even that the premises shall be fit for the purpose for which they are rented. 3 Kent Com., 465; Brown Leg. Max. (3 Ed.), 213-214; Fowler v. … Bank v. Newton, 76 N. Y., 616 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Queen City Coach Co. v. Lee

    218 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1940

    Witnesses who were at tbe wreck 10 or 15 minutes after tbe collision said tbe Ford was torn all to pieces and tbat Andrew Freeman was under tbe floor boards dead. Tbe left wheel was off. … Queen v. Ins. Co., 177 N. C., 34 .” Batchelor v. R. R., 196 N. C., 84 ; Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 217 N. C., 368 (371).

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Jarrett v. High Point Trunk & Bag Co.

    144 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1907

    Brown, J. … State v. Austin, 79 N. C., 626 ; Burton v. Railroad, 84 N. C., 197 ; Bynum v. Bynum, 33 N. C., 636 ; State v. Wolf, 122 N. C., 1081 .

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Coggins v. Coggins

    260 N.C. 765 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1963

    “After the filing -of a .complaint in any action, for divorce, whether from the bonds -of matrimony or from bed and board, both before and after final judgment therein, it is lawful for the judge ... to make .such orders … G.S. 50-13; Griffin v. Griffin, 237 N.C. 404 , 75 S.E. 2d 133 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Moore v. City of Charlotte

    204 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

    Tillery v. Lumber Co., 172 N. C., 296 ; Marks v. McLeod, 203 N. C., at p. 258-9. … Board of Education v. Greenville, 132 N. C., 4 ; Dockery v. Hamlet, 162 N. C., 118 . The pipe payment is of no avail to plaintiff as plaintiff presented no claim under the statute. Abbott Realty Co. v. Charlotte, 198 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jolley v. . Humphries

    204 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1933

    Lineberger v. Phillips, 198 N. C., 661 , 153 S. E., 118 ; Washburn v. Biggerstaff, 195 N. C., 624 , 143 S. E., 210 ; Barbee v. Thompson, 194 N. C., 411 , 139 S. E., 838 . … C., 586 ; Francks v. Whitaker, 116 N. C., 518 ; Chewning v. Mason, 158 N. C., 579 ; Dunn v. Hines, 164 N. C., 114 ; Taylor v. Brown, 165 N. C., 157 ; McCallum v. McCallum, 167 N. C., 310 . Tbe case of Hauser v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.