Case law

Poole v. Harvey Motor Co.

255 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1961

Farris v. Trust Co., 215 N.C. 466 , 2 S.E. 2d 363 ; Bullock v. Williams, 213 N.C. 320 , 195 S.E. 791 ; Fleming v. R. R., 168 N.C. 248 , 84 S.E. 270 ; Carson v. Dellinger, 90 N.C. 226 .” … R., 163 N.C. 431 , 79 S.E. 690 ; Brown v. Hillsboro, 185 N.C. 368 , 117 S.E. 41 ; Brown v. Sheets, 197 N.C. 268 , 148 S.E. 233 ; S. v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620 , 161 S.E. 81 ; Love v.

Southern Railway Co. v. Mecklenburg County

231 N.C. 148 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1949

V, sec. 6. … Commissioners v. Stedman, 141 N.C. 448 .

Hanie v. . Penland

194 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1927

S. v. Fullenwider, 26 N. C., 364 ; S. v. Allen, 27 N. C., 36 ; Patterson v. Britt, 33 N. C., 383 ; S. v. McIntosh, 24 N. C., 53 ; Eaton v. Kelly, 72 N. C., 110 . … See, also, Adkins v. Camp, 105 Southern, 877; Miles v. Wright, 12 A. L. R., 970; Jordan v. Neer, 125 Pac., 1117 ; Brown v. Wallis, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1019; Mead v. Young, 19 N. C., 521 .

Bain v. City of Goldsboro

164 N.C. 102 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1913

Murphy v. Webb, 156 N. C., 402 . … Bradshaw v. High Point, 151 N. C., 517 ; Fawcett v. Mount Airy, 134 N. C., 125 ; Robinson v. Goldsboro, 135 N. C., 382 , to which may be added Water Co. v. Trustees, 151 N.

Walker v. . McLaurin

227 N.C. 53 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1946

Carawan v. Clark, 219 N. C., 214 , 13 S. E. (2d), 237 ; Wadford v. Gillette, 193 N. C., 413 , 137 S. E., 314 ; Beeson v. Smith, 149 N. C., 142 , 62 S. E., 888 ; Ellington v. Ellington, 103 N. C., 54 , 9 S. … Brown v. Osteen, 197 N. C., 305 , 148 S. E., 434 ; Sugg v. Credit Corp., 196 N. C., 97 , 144 S.

State v. . Taylor

172 N.C. 892 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1916

S. v. Campbell, 133 N. C., 640 ; S. v. Fender, 125 N. C., 649 ; S. v. Howell, 107 N. C., 835 ; S. v. Marsh, 91 N. C., 632 ; S. v. Graham, 53 N. C., 397 . … S. v. Ratliff, 170 N. C., 707 ; S. v. Francis, 157 N. C., 621 . No error.

Casket Co. v. . Wheeler

182 N.C. 459 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1921

It is alleged that prior to the beginning of the action, to wit, on 2 September, 1915, Wheeler had been suspended as secretary and treasurer by action of the stock holders and the board of directors, who had elected B. … And Brown v. Harding . 170 N.C. 253 , 262 (S.C., 171 N.C. 689 ), is to the same effect as Newsom v. Russell, supra . But see, also, Wiggin v. Sweet , 6 Metcalf (Mass.) 194 (S. c., 39 Am. Dec. Extra Anno. 716); Black v.

Singleton v. Stewart

280 N.C. 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 9, 1972

Chan Wing Cheung v. Hamilton (1st Cir., 1962), 298 F. 2d 459 ; Hartmann v. Time, Inc., (3rd Cir., 1947), 166 F. 2d 127 ; United States v. William S. Gray & Co., (SDNY, 1945), 59 F. Supp. 665 ; Lindsey v. … Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., supra; United States v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co., (10th Cir., 1961), *465 287 F. 2d 601 ; H. K. Ferguson Co. v.

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. Hook

261 N.C. 517 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1964

See G.S. 160-453.6 (g); Huntley v. Potter, supra. If the municipality does not desire remand to the governing board, the proceedings will be dismissed. … If the matter is remanded to the governing board for amendment and further proceedings, other objections presently urged may be obviated. Error and remanded.

State v. Summers.

141 N.C. 841 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1906

Brown, J. … C., 760 ; State v. Costin, 89 N. C., 511 ; State v. Harris, 106 N. C., 682 ; State v. Wilson, 101 N. C., 730 ; State v Foust, 114 N. *844 C., 842.

Southern Spruce Co. v. Hunnicutt

166 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

In Withrell v. Murphy, 154 N. C., 89 , Justice Manning, quoting from 1 Enc. … Blanton v. Bostic, 126 N. C., 421 .

Heavener v. . R. R.

141 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1906

*Page 210 Cited: Morrow v. R. R. , 147 N.C. 627 ; Allen v. R. R. , 149 N.C. 260 ; Hammett v. R. R. , 157 N.C. 324 ; Shepherd v. R. R. , 163 N.C. 520 ; Hill v. R. R. , 166 N.C. 597 ; McNeill v. R. … R. , 167 N.C. 399 ; Horne v. R. R. , 170 N.C. 648 , 661 ; Horton v. R. R. , 175 N.C. 484 . (248)

Jeffords v. Albemarle Waterworks

157 N.C. 10 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1911

In McDugald v. Smith, 33 N. … Lewis v. Covington, 130 N. C., 541 . When, as here, the referee’s findings of fact are affirmed by the judge, his action is conclusive if there is any evidence to support such findings. Brown v. R. R., 154 N.

Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville

301 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1980

Upon compliance with the requirements of notice and hearing, the municipal governing board may, at a regular or special meeting held no earlier than seven days after the public hearing, adopt an ordinance extending the corporate … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 39 L. Ed. 2d 714 , 94 S. Ct. 1274 (1974).

Hester v. Traction Co.

138 N.C. 288 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 2, 1905

who made bis report to the Board of Aldermen, tbe expenses of the work being borne by tbe defendant. … Moose v. Carson 104 N. C., 431 ; White v. Railroad, 113 N. C., 610 . As said in State v. Higgs, 126 N.

Coach Co. v. . Lee

218 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1940

Barnes v. Wilson , 217 N.C. 190 (195). In Hicks v. … Queen v. Ins. Co. , 177 N.C. 34 ." Batchelor v. R. R. , 196 N.C. 84 ; Brown v. Montgomery Ward Co. , 217 N.C. 368 (371). The evidence on which this exception and assignment of error is predicated — the testimony of B.

Cox v. . Brower

114 N.C. 422 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

Grant v. Burgwyn, 84 N. C., 560 ; Alstons. Hawkins, 105 N. C., 3 ; Buchanan v. Rowland, 5 N. J. Law, 721; Rowland v. Windley, 86 N. C., 36 . … Grant v. Burgwyn and Rowland v. Windley, supra,.

Pruitt v. Great American Insurance Company

241 N.C. 725 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 30, 1955

Co. v. Brown, 208 Okla. 317 , 255 P. 2d 919 . See also Anno. 22 A.L.R. 2d 984 . Plaintiff contends in his brief that Davis v. Home Ins. Co., 125 S.C. 381 , 118 S.E. 536 , has identical facts with the case here. … Co. v. Brown, supra; Dohlin v. Dwelling House Mut. Ins.

State v. Ardrey

232 N.C. 721 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 29, 1950

Thompson v. Angel, 214 N.C. 3 , 197 S.E. 618 ; S. v. Jackson, supra; S. v. Merrick, 171 N.C. 788 , 88 S.E. 501 . … Spencer v. Brown, 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 . “On the substantive features of the ease arising on the evidence, the judge is required to give ■correct charge concerning it.” School District v.

Browne v. . R. R.

108 N.C. 35 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

This case must be distinguished from Rose v. R. R. , 106 N.C. 168 , and Pickens v. R. … Cited: Burgin v. R. R. , 115 N.C. 674 ; Tillett v. R. R. , 118 N.C. 1046 ; Johnson v. R. R. , 130 N.C. 490 ; Denny v. R. R. , 132 N.C. 345 ; Dortch v. R. R. , 148 N.C. 579 ; Thorpe v.