Case law

Moore v. . Caldwell County

207 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1934

Y, sec. 6, of the Constitution, and that the plaintiff has agreed to accept in settlement of said note bonds to be issued pursuant to a resolution passed by the board of commissioners, “provided the same be a valid obligation … Burton v. Realty Co., 188 N. C., 473 , and-cases there cited.

State v. . Manning

225 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1945

It is in evidence that on the night of 5 June, 1944, the defendants, Joe Martin and Herman Manning, took Beulah Brown, a pregnant woman, in a car driven by Manning, from her home in Martin County to Tarboro. … S. v. Martin , 182 N.C. 846 , 109 S.E. 74 . No error.

Cross v. . Cross

90 N.C. 15 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Brown v. Williams, 84 N. C., 116 . There, the petitioner allowed twelve months to elapse before filing his petition, and it was held he had lost his appeal by his laches.

Sample v. Morgan

311 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 1984

In Bank v. … See Rossiter v. Vogel, 134 F. 2d 908 ; Bergren v. Davis, 287 F. Supp. 52 . Chapter 1A, Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. (Emphasis added.) See Whitten v. AMC/Jeep, Inc., 292 N.C. 84 , 231 S.E. 2d 891 (1977); Mangum v.

Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville

301 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1980

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). … A corporate board can decide how the corporation will cast its vote in an annexation referendum the same way it makes any major policy decision—by a vote of the board of directors.

Halyburton v. . Dobson

65 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1871

Cited: Dobbins v. Osborne , 67 N.C. 260 ; Bryant v. Morris , 69 N.C. 448 ; Barlow v. Norfleet , 72 N.C. 539 ; Lockhart v. Bell , 90 N.C. 504 ; McRae v. Mallory , 90 N.C. 525 ; Rush v. Steed , 91 N.C. 229 ; Loftin v. … Featherston , 122 N.C. 749 ; Smith v. Moore , 142 N.C. 284 ; Brown v. Adams , 174 N.C. 494 , 502 . (91)

Tucker v. . Wilkins

105 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

The Code, § 268; Grant v. Gooch, decided at this term, and cases there cited. Obviously, the evidence of the plaintiff, testifying in his own behalf, embraced by the second exception, was competent. … Roulhack v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1 ; Pasour v. Lineberger, 90 N. C., 159 . The other exceptions are without merit.

State v. Smith

351 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2000

State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 731, 735-36 , 268 S.E.2d 201, 204 (1980). … Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 231 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 34 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987).

Supply Co. v. . Plumbing Co.

195 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 16, 1928

Bostwick v. R. R. , 179 N.C. 485 ; Brooks v. White , 187 N.C. 656 ; Baker v. Corey, ante , 299. … Hartman Co. v. Farrior , 95 N.C. 177 ; Scott v. Life Asso. , 137 N.C. 515 ; Currie v. Mining Co. , 157 N.C. 209 ; Hyatt v. Clark , 169 N.C. 178 ; Miller v. Smith , 169 N.C. 210 ; Montague v. Lumpkins , 178 N.C. 270 .

Pulley v. Pulley

256 N.C. 600 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1962

Glenn v. City of Raleigh, 248 N.C. 378 , 103 S.E. 2d 482 ; Hayes v. City of Wilmington, 243 N.C. 525 , 91 S.E. 2d 673 ; Bruce v. O’Neal Flying Service, 234 N.C. 79 , 66 S.E. 2d 312 ; Maddox v. … Brown, 233 N.C. 519 , 64 S.E. 2d 864 .

Doster v. . English

152 N.C. 339 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1910

Tyler on Usury, p. 110; Webb on Usury, sec. 18, and cases cited; Bennett v. Best, 142 N. C., 168 ; U. S. v. Wagoner, 34 U. S., 378 . … Bennett v. Best, supra. No error.

Grant v. . Reese

82 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1880

Overby v. B. & L. Association, 81 N. C., 56 ; Jones v. Boyd, 80 N. C., 258 , and Hettrick v. Page, ante 65. … Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C., 27 ; Green v. Castlebury, Ibid., 20; Atkinson v. Whitehead, 77 N. C., 418 , and Overby v. B. & L. Association, supra.

Glover v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks

250 N.C. 35 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1959

Riddle v. Artis, 246 N.C. 629 , 99 S.E. 2d 857 ; Lewis v. Lee, 246 N.C. 68 , 97 S.E. 2d 469 ; Skinner v. Evans, 243 N. C. 760 , 92 S.E. 2d 209 ; Clinard v. Lambeth, 234 N.C. 410 , 67 S.E. 2d 452 ; Sabine v. … Sabine v. Gill, supra; Smith v. Sink, 210 N.C. 815 , 188 S.E. 631 ; Shaffer v. Bank, 201 N.C. 415, 160 S.E. 481 .

Huffman v. Ingold

181 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921

Strother v. R. R., 123 N. C., 199 , and numerous cases there cited. … Lumber Co. v. Branch, 158 N. C., 251 , which the plaintiff requests us to do in this case.

Brauff v. Commissioner of Revenue

251 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1959

In construing the statute this Court, in the case of Cannon v. … Cannon v. Cannon, supra.

Spicer v. City of Goldsboro

226 N.C. 557 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1946

Thus it appears the official board at all times kept in mind the existence of this area as a part of an existing street. … Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. Ayres, supra; S. v. Board of Park Com’rs., 110 N. W., 1121 , 9 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1045.

Smith v. Ritch

196 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1928

Ridge v. R. R., 167 N. C., 510 ; Myers v. R. R., 166 N. C., 233 ; Holton v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 68 ; Noble v. Lumber Co., 151 N. C., 76 ; Wade v. Contracting Co., 149 N. C., 177 .” Robinson v. Ivey, supra. … Thompson, bis helper, was sawing tbe boards and pushing them up to bim. He started tbe nail in the board and pushed tbe board in place, and reached out to nail it with bis other band.

Kadis v. . Weil

164 N.C. 84 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1913

BROWN, J. -The plaintiff contends that he and his wife have a right to convey in fee simple, free from encumbrances, to the *87 defendant, tbe land conveyed to tbe plaintiff'by tbe said Martha J. Hollowell and George E. … Hauser v. Shore, 40 N. C., 357 ; Whitted v. Nash, 66 N. C., 590 ; Grimes v. Taft, 98 N. C., 198 ; Hunt v. Bank, 17 N. C., 60 ; 39 Cyc., pp. 378 and 379; A. and E. (2d Ed.), vol. 28, pp. 1130 and 1131. Affirmed

McIlwinn v. . Carraway

4 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1817

NOTE. — See Dozier v. Muse , 9 N.C. 482 ; Moore v. Duffy , 10 N.C. 578 ; Browne v. Gaves , 11 N.C. 342 ; Harrison v. Battle , 16 N.C. 537 ; Mordecai v. Parker , 14 N.C. 425 ; Gillis v. McKay , 15 N.C. 172 ; McKay v. … Williams , 21 N.C. 398 ; Camp v. Coxe , 18 N.C. 52 ; Henderson v. Hoke , 21 N.C. 119 ; Tharpe v. Ricks, ibid. , 613. *Page 453 (630)

Lindsey v. . Mitchell

174 N.C. 458 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1917

R. v. McCarthy, *460 96 U. S., 258 ; First National Bank, etc., v. Dovetail, etc., Co., 148 Ind., 534 -538) ; and a recent case in our own Court (Brown v. Chemical Co., 165 N. … Co. v. Tierny, 133 N. C., 631 ; Dows v. Exchange Bank, 91 U. S., 618 .