Case law

Solomon v. Wilmington Sewerage Co.

133 N.C. 144 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1903

Pearson, J., in Purnell v. Daniel, 43 N. … Lowe v. Commissioners, 70 N. C., 532 ; Blackwell v. McElwee, 94 N. C., 425 .

Willey v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

96 N.C. 408 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

Brown v. Morris, 4 D. & B., 429; Ward v. Herrin, 4 Jones, 23 ; Moore v. Hill, 85 N. C., 218 ; Strickland v. Draughan, 88 N. C., 315 ; Clements v. Rogers, 95 N. C., 248 ; Morgan v. Lewis, Ibid., 296. … Tayloe v. Steamship Co., 88 N. C., 15 . See also State v. Hardie, 83 N. C., 619 ; State v. Nicholson, 85 N. C., 548 . The judgment must be affirmed. No error. Affirmed.

Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Askin's Retail Stores, Inc.

211 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1937

J., 1152; Brown v. Lumber Co., 167 N. C., 9 ; Hall v. Hall, 179 N. C., 571 ; Alexander v. Vann, 180 N. C., 187 ; Hedgepeth v. Coleman, 183 N. C., 309 ; Pentuff v. Park, 194 N. C., 146 . In Paul v. Auction Co., 181 N. … In Pentuff v.

State v. McKoy

323 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1988

. ---, 100 L.Ed. 2d 935 (1988); State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E. 2d 1 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 98 L.Ed. 2d 406 (1987); State v. … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 70 , 337 S.E. 2d 808, 829 (1985). We use the “pool” of similar cases announced in State v.

Sample v. Morgan

311 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 1984

In Bank v. … See Rossiter v. Vogel, 134 F. 2d 908 ; Bergren v. Davis, 287 F. Supp. 52 . Chapter 1A, Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. (Emphasis added.) See Whitten v. AMC/Jeep, Inc., 292 N.C. 84 , 231 S.E. 2d 891 (1977); Mangum v.

Supply Co. v. . Plumbing Co.

195 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 16, 1928

Bostwick v. R. R. , 179 N.C. 485 ; Brooks v. White , 187 N.C. 656 ; Baker v. Corey, ante , 299. … Hartman Co. v. Farrior , 95 N.C. 177 ; Scott v. Life Asso. , 137 N.C. 515 ; Currie v. Mining Co. , 157 N.C. 209 ; Hyatt v. Clark , 169 N.C. 178 ; Miller v. Smith , 169 N.C. 210 ; Montague v. Lumpkins , 178 N.C. 270 .

Grant v. . Reese

82 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1880

Overby v. B. & L. Association, 81 N. C., 56 ; Jones v. Boyd, 80 N. C., 258 , and Hettrick v. Page, ante 65. … Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C., 27 ; Green v. Castlebury, Ibid., 20; Atkinson v. Whitehead, 77 N. C., 418 , and Overby v. B. & L. Association, supra.

Richmond & Danville R. R. v. Brogden

74 N.C. 707 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

It is decided in the Wilmington, Columbia & Augusta Railroad Company v. The Board of Commissioners of Brunswick country, 74 N. C. Rep. 10 , and in the Richmond & Danville Railroad Company v. … Justice Davis in delivering the opinion of the court in *712 Wilmington Railroad v.

Moore v. . Caldwell County

207 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1934

Y, sec. 6, of the Constitution, and that the plaintiff has agreed to accept in settlement of said note bonds to be issued pursuant to a resolution passed by the board of commissioners, “provided the same be a valid obligation … Burton v. Realty Co., 188 N. C., 473 , and-cases there cited.

Yelton v. . McKinney

203 N.C. 785 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1933

Geiger v. Caldwell, 184 N. C., 387 , 114 S. E., 497 . … Brown v. Sheets, 197 N. C., 268 , 148 S. E., 233 ; S. v. Casey, 201 N. C., 620 ; Pridgen v. R. R., ante, 62. No error.

Huffman v. Ingold

181 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921

Strother v. R. R., 123 N. C., 199 , and numerous cases there cited. … Lumber Co. v. Branch, 158 N. C., 251 , which the plaintiff requests us to do in this case.

Brauff v. Commissioner of Revenue

251 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1959

In construing the statute this Court, in the case of Cannon v. … Cannon v. Cannon, supra.

State v. . Manning

225 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1945

It is in evidence that on the night of 5 June, 1944, the defendants, Joe Martin and Herman Manning, took Beulah Brown, a pregnant woman, in a car driven by Manning, from her home in Martin County to Tarboro. … S. v. Martin , 182 N.C. 846 , 109 S.E. 74 . No error.

Hudson v. . Greensboro

185 N.C. 502 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 26, 1923

That said board of commissioners shall annually levy a tax sufficient to pay the interest on said bonds and to provide a sinking fund for the payment of the principal thereof at maturity. … Cited: Ketchie v. Hedrick , 186 N.C. 393 ; Hinton v. State Treas. , 193 N.C. 502 ; Yarborough v. Park Com. , 196 N.C. 293 ; Turner v. Reidsville , 224 N.C. 44 ; Brumley v. Baxter , 225 N.C. 698 ; Green v.

Kadis v. . Weil

164 N.C. 84 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1913

BROWN, J. -The plaintiff contends that he and his wife have a right to convey in fee simple, free from encumbrances, to the *87 defendant, tbe land conveyed to tbe plaintiff'by tbe said Martha J. Hollowell and George E. … Hauser v. Shore, 40 N. C., 357 ; Whitted v. Nash, 66 N. C., 590 ; Grimes v. Taft, 98 N. C., 198 ; Hunt v. Bank, 17 N. C., 60 ; 39 Cyc., pp. 378 and 379; A. and E. (2d Ed.), vol. 28, pp. 1130 and 1131. Affirmed

McIlwinn v. . Carraway

4 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1817

NOTE. — See Dozier v. Muse , 9 N.C. 482 ; Moore v. Duffy , 10 N.C. 578 ; Browne v. Gaves , 11 N.C. 342 ; Harrison v. Battle , 16 N.C. 537 ; Mordecai v. Parker , 14 N.C. 425 ; Gillis v. McKay , 15 N.C. 172 ; McKay v. … Williams , 21 N.C. 398 ; Camp v. Coxe , 18 N.C. 52 ; Henderson v. Hoke , 21 N.C. 119 ; Tharpe v. Ricks, ibid. , 613. *Page 453 (630)

Halyburton v. . Dobson

65 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1871

Cited: Dobbins v. Osborne , 67 N.C. 260 ; Bryant v. Morris , 69 N.C. 448 ; Barlow v. Norfleet , 72 N.C. 539 ; Lockhart v. Bell , 90 N.C. 504 ; McRae v. Mallory , 90 N.C. 525 ; Rush v. Steed , 91 N.C. 229 ; Loftin v. … Featherston , 122 N.C. 749 ; Smith v. Moore , 142 N.C. 284 ; Brown v. Adams , 174 N.C. 494 , 502 . (91)

Turner v. North Carolina Public-Service Co.

170 N.C. 172 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1915

Dulaney v. Railways, 104 Md., 423 . … This question is discussed by the Supreme Court of Maine in Taylor v. R. R., 91 Me., 193, but we will not consider it upon this appeal.

Tyer v. Meadows

215 N.C. 733 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1939

Patterson v. McCormick, 181 N. C., 313 ; Smith v. Creech, 186 N. C., 190 ; Wells v. Williams, 187 N. C., 138 .” Wilmington Savings & Trust Co. v. Cowan, 208 N. C., 236 ; Heyer v. Bulluck, 210 N. C., 321 . In Walker v. … Brown v. Brown, 195 N. C., 315 (320). Tbe setting: Tbe testator, Joseph F. Meadows, was married twice. Plaintiff, Marie M. Tyer, was tbe only child of tbe marriage by his first wife, Susan B. Meadow's.

Palmer v. . Smith

229 N.C. 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1948

S. v. Harris, 216 N. C. 746 , 6 S. E. (2) 854, 128 A. L. R. 658; State v. McGrail, 117 W. Va. 51 , 183 S. E. 686 ; State Ex Rel. Booth v. Beck Jewelry Enterprises, 220 Ind. 276 , 41 N. E. (2) 622, 141 A. L. R. 876. … S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C. 551 , 152 S. E. 693 ; Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, Inc., 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; People v. Griffith, 280 Ill. 18 , 117 N. E. 195 ; Liggett Co. v.