Case law

Young v. Barrier

268 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1966

Devens v. Goldberg, 33 Cal. 2d 173 , 199 P. 2d 943 ; Gordon v. … In Devens v.

King v. BEAUFORT CO. BD. OF EDUC.

690 S.E.2d 529 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 2010

690 S.E.2d 529 (2010) KING v. BEAUFORT CO. BD. OF EDUC. No. 480A09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 25, 2010. Jane Wettach, for Revondia Harvey-Barrow. Curtis H. … School Boards School Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 25th of January 2010."

Fox v. Asheville Army Store, Inc.

216 N.C. 468 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1939

Fry v. R. R., 159 N. C., 357 , 74 S. E., 971 ; Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., 431 , 79 S. E., 690 ; Brown v. Mfg. Co., 175 N. C., 201 , 95 S. E., 168 . … Wallace v. R. R., 104 N. C., 442 , 10 S. E., 552 ; Rushing v. R. R., 149 N. C., 158 , 62 S. E., 890 ; Ridge v. R. R., 167 N. C., 510 , 83 S. E., 762 ; Beaver v. Fetter, 176 N. C., 334 , 97 S. E., 145 ; Ledford v.

Richardson v. Bank of America

654 S.E.2d 481 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 2007

654 S.E.2d 481 (2007) RICHARDSON v. BANK OF AMERICA. No. 240PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 8, 2007. John H. Culver, III, Amy Pritchard Williams, Charlotte, Walter E. … Christopher Browning, Jr., Solicitor General, Philip A. Lehman, M. Lynne Weaver, Assistant Attorney Generals, for State of NC. L.

Harrison v. . Burgess

8 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1821

To declare that the property of A. belongs to B, has been by this Court decided to be beyond tiie power of the Legislature, in the case, Den on demise of Robertson v. Browne, relative to Mrs. Browne’s land.

State v. Ferguson

238 N.C. 656 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1953

Harper, supra; S. v. Elliott, 232 N.C. 377 , 61 S.E. 2d 93 ; S. v. Meyers, 190 N.C. 239 , 129 S.E. 600 . See also: S. v. Brown, ante, 260, 77 S.E. 2d 627 ; S. v. Gibbs, ante, 258, 77 S.E. 2d 779 ; *659 S. v. … S. v. Meyers, supra ( 190 N.C. 239 ). See also S. v. Ham, ante, 94, 76 S.E. 2d 346 .

Swink v. Carolina Asbestos Co.

210 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1936

In Greer v. Laundry, 202 N. C., 729 , 164 S. … Holmes v. Brown Co., 207 N. C., 785 , 178 S. E., 569 ; Winberry v. Farley Stores, 204 N. C., 79 , 167 S. E., 475 ; Webb v. Tomlinson, 202 N. C., 860 , 164 S. E., 860 ; Parrish v. Armour & Co., 200 N. C., 654 , 158 S.

Thornton v. Harris.

140 N.C. 498 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1906

As was said in the similar case of Simmons v. Allison, 118 N. … The three plaintiffs, who were on the original board, are entitled to execute their trust — as against these defendants — and to the process of the court to be restored to their functions.

Empie v. . Empie

198 N.C. 562 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1930

The judgment is sustained by Mercer v. Downs, 191 N. C., 203 , in which the devise was in words almost identical with those in case under consideration. … This decision has been cited and approved in a number of cases, among them Jessup v. Nixon, 196 N. C., 33 , and Waller v. Brown, 197 N. C., 508 .

Woodcock v. . Trust Co.

214 N.C. 224 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1938

Ogburn , 181 N.C. 324 , 107 S.E. 238 ); "for public school purposes" to be cared for by school committee ( Chandler v. Board of Education , 181 N.C. 444 , 107 S.E. 452 ); land "for a home for the minister" ( Holton v. … Elliott , 193 N.C. 708 , 138 S.E. 3 ), to trustees for education of a girl to be selected by them ( Humphrey v. Board of Trustees , 203 N.C. 201 , 165 S.E. 547 ). In Whitsett v.

State v. . McLeod

209 N.C. 54 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1935

S. v. Williams, 208 N. C., 352 ; S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747 , 175 S. E., 116 . … S. v. Williams, supra; S. v. Johnson, 205 N. C., 610 , 172 S. E., 219 .

Willey v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

96 N.C. 408 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

Brown v. Morris, 4 D. & B., 429; Ward v. Herrin, 4 Jones, 23 ; Moore v. Hill, 85 N. C., 218 ; Strickland v. Draughan, 88 N. C., 315 ; Clements v. Rogers, 95 N. C., 248 ; Morgan v. Lewis, Ibid., 296. … Tayloe v. Steamship Co., 88 N. C., 15 . See also State v. Hardie, 83 N. C., 619 ; State v. Nicholson, 85 N. C., 548 . The judgment must be affirmed. No error. Affirmed.

Briggs v. . Morris

54 N.C. 193 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1854

This case very much resembles; in its prominent features that of Brown v. Carson Busb. Eq. Rep. 212 and must be disposed of in the same way the bill must be dismissed with costs. Decree accordingly.

Matter of Foreclosure of Trust by Goforth

334 N.C. 369 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 1993

Brown v. Jennings, 188 N.C. 155 , 124 S.E. 150 (1924); Eubanks v. Becton, 158 N.C. 230 , 73 S.E. 1009 (1912)." … Farmers Bank v. Brown Distributors, 307 N.C. 342, 350 , 298 S.E.2d 357, 362 (1983).

Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Union County Hospital Ass'n

234 N.C. 536 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1951

G.S. 1-126, G.S. 1-153; Patterson v. R. R., 214 N.C. 38 , 198 S.E. 364 ; Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 . … N.S. 801; Hoke v. Glenn, 167 N.C. 594 , 83 S.E. 807 ; Johnson v. Hospital, 196 N.C. 610 , 146 S.E. 573 ; Cowans v. Hospitals, 197 N.C. 41 , 147 S.E. 672 ; Herndon v. Massey, supra; Smith v.

Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANY

257 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1962

Petroleum Co. v. Allen, 219 N.C. 461 , 14 S.E. 2d 402 ; Woodridge v. Brown, 149 N.C. 299 , 62 S.E. 1076 . See also 39 N.C. Law Rev. 299 (1961). However, none of the North Carolina cases deal with warranties of title. … Browning, 145 N.C. 71 , 58 S.E. 759 ; Lane v. Richardson, 104 N.C. 642 , 10 S.E. 189 .

In Re Appeal of Parker

214 N.C. 51 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 22, 1938

Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. , 272 U.S. 365 , 71 L.Ed., 303 , 54 A.L.R., 1016 ; Nectow v. Cambridge , 277 U.S. 183 , 72 L.Ed., 842 ; Zahn v. Board of Public Works , 274 U.S. 325 , 71 L.Ed., 1074 . … Cas. 1917-C, 594; Rast v. Van Deman and L. Co. , 240 U.S. 342 , 60 L.Ed., 679 , L.R.A. 1917-A, 421, Ann. Cas. 1917-B, 455; Price v. Illinois , 238 U.S. 446 , 59 L.Ed., 1400 ; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, supra.

In Re Hickerson

235 N.C. 716 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1952

S. v. Woolard, 119 N.C. 779 , 25 S.E. 719 ; Machinery Co. v. Sellers, 197 N.C. 30 , 147 S.E. 674 ; Dyer v. Dyer, 212 N.C. 620 , 194 S.E. 278 ; S. v. Keller, 214 N.C. 447 , 199 S.E. 620 . … And in Abernethy v.

In Re the Will of Cauble

272 N.C. 706 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1968

This Court said, in In Re Will of Brown, 203 N.C. 347 , at 350: “Anyone who has observed another, or conversed with him, or had dealings with him, and a reasonable opportunity, based thereon, of forming an opinion, satisfactory … White v. Hines, 182 N.C. 275 , 109 S.E. 31 .”

Howard v. Bell

232 N.C. 611 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1950

Williams v. Kirkman, ante, 609; Carson v. Doggett, 231 N.C. 629 . We take the plaintiff’s evidence as true in testing the sufficiency of his case. Graham v. Gas Co., 231 N.C. 680 . … Boards were placed in front and under the wheels to give them gripping or purchasing power in pulling the car out. One of the spinning wheels threw its board backward and against the plaintiff’s leg, injuring it.