Case law

Best v. . Best

161 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 26, 1913

Arrington v. Arrington, 91 N. C., 301 ; Commissioners v. Satchwell, 88 N. C., 1 ; Hines v. Hines, 84 N. C., 122 . … Lee v. McKoy, 118 N. C., 518 ; Byrd v. Byrd, 117 N. C., 523 ; Proctor v. Proctor, 105 N. C., 222 ; Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 .

State v. . Staples

157 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1911

Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, 149 N. C., 128 ; Tate v. Greensboro, 114 N. C., 392 . There was some limitation placed on the principle in the case of S. v. Higgs, 126 N. … Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, supra; S. v. Whitlock, supra; Small v. Edenton, supra; City of Chicago v. Gunning System, 214 Ill., 628 ; City of Rochester v. West, 164 N. Y., 510 ; City of Passaic v. Bill Posting Co., 71 N. J.

Grimsley v. Nelson

468 S.E.2d 774 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 26, 1996

Grimsley v. Leroy Jerome NELSON (unnamed party, Travelers Indemnity Company, appealed). No. 35A95. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 26, 1996. Beth M. Bryant, Wilmington, for Travelers, an unnamed party. David A. … Brown, Raleigh, Albeon G. Anderson, Rocky Mount, for Grimsley, et al. Prior report: 342 N.C. 542 , 467 S.E.2d 92 .

State v. . Christy

170 N.C. 772 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 12, 1916

S. v. Drakeford , 162 N.C. 667 , and cases cited. … Cited: S. v. Rodman , 188 N.C. 724 (4f); S. v. Grier , 203 N.C. 589 (4g); S. v. Moore , 210 N.C. 692 (4f); S. v. Caldwell , 212 N.C. 489 (4g); S. v. Richardson , 216 N.C. 305 (4g); S. v. Smith , 221 N.C. 407 (4f); S. v.

State v. . Smith

170 N.C. 742 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1915

Brown, J. Tbe defendant Malcolm Smith and one Charles Smith were indicted on separate bills of indictment, and also on a joint bill, at January Term, 1907, for tbe murder of one Milton Bunnell. … S. v. Thornton, 35 N. C., 256 ; 12 Cyc., 268. The contention of the defendant that the testimony of Charles Smith was not sufficiently corroborated cannot be sustained.

Poole v. Miller

342 N.C. 349 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1995

Brown, 307 N.C. 93 , 296 S.E.2d 459 (1982), and found that final judgment under Rule 68 was equivalent to the jury’s verdict. See Poole v. Miller, 116 N.C. App. 435, 437 , 448 S.E.2d 123, 124 (1994). … Plaintiff further contends that in addition to disregarding the plain meaning of Rule 68, the Court of Appeals inappropriately relied upon this Court’s decision in Purdy v. Brown, 307 N.C. 93 , 296 S.E.2d 459 .

State v. McKoy

323 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1988

. ---, 100 L.Ed. 2d 935 (1988); State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E. 2d 1 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 98 L.Ed. 2d 406 (1987); State v. … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 70 , 337 S.E. 2d 808, 829 (1985). We use the “pool” of similar cases announced in State v.

McGill v. Bison Fast Freight, Inc.

245 N.C. 469 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1957

Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E. 2d 71 . 2. … Roth v. McCord, 232 N.C. 678 , 62 S.E. 2d 64 . *474 In the Brown and Roth cases, for the reasons stated, the death was regarded as arising out of and in the course of decedent’s employment by the lessee.

Garland v. . Ins. Co.

179 N.C. 67 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

BROWN, J., dissenting. … BROWN, J., dissenting.

State v. Thompson

233 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1951

Brown, 225 N.C. 22 , 33 S.E. 2d 121 ; S. v. Holt, 195 N.C. 240 , 135 S.E. 324 ; S. v. Mills, 181 N.C. 530 , 106 S.E. 677 . A warrant, however, cannot be amended so as to charge a different offense. S. v. … S. v. Bowser, supra; S. v. Stiles, supra; S. v. Summerlin, supra.

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Thrower

213 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1938

Pelletier v. Saunders, 67 N. C., 261 ; Jones v. Statesville, 97 N. C., 86 ; Mfg. Co. v. Brower, 105 N. C., 440 . Speaking to the subject in Roberts v. Moore, 185 N. … Brown v. Cogdell, 136 N. C., 33 ; Mfg. Co. v. Brower, 105 N. C., 440 ; Jones v. Statesville, 97 N. C., 86 .”

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Maxwell

199 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1930

Rep., 496; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S., 563, 573 , 54 L. Ed., 883, 887 , 30 Sup. Ct. Rep., 578; Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield Twp., 247 U. S., 350, 353 , 62 L. Ed., 1154, 1156 , 38 Sup. Ct. … Brown-Forman Co., v. Kentucky, 217 U. S., 54 , L. Ed., 883. Tbe tax is not unreasonable or discriminatory. Ohio Oil Co., v. Conway, supra. Tbe judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Swanson v. State

330 N.C. 390 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1991

Brown, K.A. Brown, William D. Brown, Betty P. Bullock, Robert S. Bullock, Findley Burns, Jr., Ray G. Burrell, Richard E. Bush, James M. Byrne, Norman L. Carlton, Matthew E. Carmean, Frank Cates, J. … V, § 2(6). Assuming N.C. Const. art.

Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Askin's Retail Stores, Inc.

211 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1937

J., 1152; Brown v. Lumber Co., 167 N. C., 9 ; Hall v. Hall, 179 N. C., 571 ; Alexander v. Vann, 180 N. C., 187 ; Hedgepeth v. Coleman, 183 N. C., 309 ; Pentuff v. Park, 194 N. C., 146 . In Paul v. Auction Co., 181 N. … In Pentuff v.

Ferebee v. . Pritchard

112 N.C. 83 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1893

Spencer v. Spencer, 3 Jones” Eq., 404; Logan v. Simmons, 3 Ired. Eq., 487; Tisdale v. Bailey, 6 Ired. Eq., 358 ; Poston v. Gillespie, 5 Jones’ Eq., 258; Goodson v. Whitfield, 5 Ired. Eq., 163 ; Baker v. Jordan, 73 N. … In Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N.

Smith v. Lumber Co.

140 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1906

Blackwell v. Dibbrell, 103 N. C., 270 ; Hicks v. Beam, 112 N. C., 644 ; Montague v. Brown, 104 N. C., 161 ; Cotton Mills v. Cotton Mills, 115 N. C., 487 ; Curtis v. Piedmont Co., 109 N. C., 405 ; Harrison v. … C., 128 ; Hawkins v. Hughes, 87 N. C., 115 .

Davis v. . Inscoe

84 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1881

Browne on Stat. of Frauds, § 130-135. … Hare v. Jernigan , 76 N.C. 471 ; Triplett v. Witherspoon , 74 N.C. 475 ; Ivey v.

Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. BUZZ OFF INSECT SHIELD, LLC

668 S.E.2d 27 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 2008

668 S.E.2d 27 (2008) HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. … Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins. Co. Mack Sperling, John S. Buford, Greensboro, Cecilia O. Miller, Diana S. Casey, San Diego, CA, for International Garment Tech. Gary K.

Bunch v. Foreman Blades Lumber Co.

174 N.C. 8 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1917

. ■ Boards are carried into the machines on a roll-way. … Cozzins v. Chair Co., 165 N. C., 364 ; Kiger v. Scales Co., 162 N. C., 136 ; Labbatt, p. 2711 et seq.

State v. . Lovelace

228 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1947

Co. v. State of Washington, 270 U. S., 87 , 70 L. Ed., 482 ; Mintz v. Baldwin, 77 L. Ed., 1245 ; Campoamor v. State Live Stock Board, 182 So., 277 ; S. v. So. Ry. Co., 141 N. C., 846 , 54 S. E., 294 ; S. v. … E., 417 ; Asbell v. Kansas, 209 U. S., 251 , 52 L. Ed., 778 ; Evans v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 122 N. W. (Minn.), 876; McSween v. State Live Stock Board, 122 So., 239 ; Rasmussen v. Idaho, 181 U. S., 198 , 45 L.