Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.51s
223 N.C. 401 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1943
Winkler v. Killian, 141 N. C., 575 , 54 S. E., 540 ; Brown v. Williams, 196 N. C., 247 , 145 S. E., 233 ; Keiger v. Sprinkle, 207 N. C., 733 , 178 S. E., 666 . “But,” said Stacy, C. J., in Neshitt v. Donoho, 198 N. … The presumption is adopted in Callahan v. Wood, supra ( 118 N. C., 752 , 24 S. E., 542 ), repudiated in Dunn v. Currie, 141 N. C., 123 , 53 S. E., 533 ; ignored in Henderson v. McLain, 146 N. C., 329 , 59 S.
Cited 21 timesPublishedMorton v. Washington Light & Water Co.
168 N.C. 582 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1915
BrowN, J., concurring in result: I recognize the fact that the overwhelming weight of authority, including that of the Supreme Court of the United States, is against the decisions of this Court in the Gorrell, *599 Fisher … Justice Walker says,, in Hill v. R. R., 143 N. C., 576: “We adopted that rule in Long v. Walker, 105 N.
Cited 6 timesPublished370 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 1, 2017
As we stated in Greene v. Spivey : "This is an appellate court. … Until this case is resolved by the Court, any county board of elections with a vacancy reducing its membership to two members-such that the board cannot meet quorum requirements under Sections 7.(h) and 7.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLittle Pep Delmonico Restaurant, Inc. v. City of Charlotte
252 N.C. 324 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1960
S. v. Brown, 250 N.C. 54 , 108 S.E. 2d 74 ; In re O’Neal, 243 N.C. 714 , 92 S.E. 2d 189 ; S. v. Staples, 157 N.C. 637 , 73 S.E. 112 ; Barger v. Smith, 156 N.C. 323 , 72 S.E. 376 ; S. v. Whitlock, 149 N.C. 542 ; 37 Am. … Speedway, Inc. v. Clayton, 247 N.C. 528 , 101 S.E. 2d 406 ; Lanier v. Warsaw, 226 N.C. 637 , 39 S.E. 2d 817 ; Advertising Co. v. Asheville, 189 N.C. 737 , 128 S.E. 149 ; Crawford v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedVest v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
208 N.C. 80 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1935
The plaintiff relies upon Reed v. Director-General, 258 U. S., 92 , 66 Law Ed., 480, and the cases of Brown v. R. R., 144 N. C., 634 , 57 S. E., 397 ; Moore v. R. R., 185 N. C., 189 , 116 S. E., 409 ; and Moore v. R. … The Brown case, supra, apparently did not involve the Employers’ Liability Act. Moore v. R. R., 186 N. C., 257 , did involve the application of said act.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoykin v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
211 N.C. 113 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1937
Rimmer v. R. R., 208 N. C., 198 , 179 S. E., 753 ; Young v. R. R., 205 N. C., 530 , 172 S. E., 177 ; Eller v. R. R., 200 N. C., 527 , 157 S. E., 800 ; Pope v. R. R., 195 N. C., 67 , 143 S. E., 350 ; Davidson v. R. … E., 354 ; Brown v. R. R., 195 N. C., 699 , 143 S. E., 536 ; Hoggard v. R. R., 194 N. C., 256 , 139 S. E., 372 ; Murray v. R. R., 93 N. C., 92 . Reversed.
Cited 6 timesPublishedNelson v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
144 N.C. 418 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 24, 1907
*419 Brown, J. … Hudson v. Railroad, 104 N. C., 491 ; Shearman and Redfield on Negligence, sec. 99; Greenleaf v. Railroad, 29 Iowa, 14 ; Colton v. Manufacturing Co., 142 N. C., 531 .
Cited 7 timesPublished323 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1988
. ---, 100 L.Ed. 2d 935 (1988); State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E. 2d 1 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 98 L.Ed. 2d 406 (1987); State v. … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 70 , 337 S.E. 2d 808, 829 (1985). We use the “pool” of similar cases announced in State v.
Vacated on other grounds by McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. 433 (1990)Cited 76 timesPublished125 N.C. 256 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1899
The 42d section, chapter 169, of the Acts of 1897, by express terms, made the Railroad Commission a board of appraisers of railroad property in these words: "Shall constitute a board of appraisers and assessors for railroad … destroying the old board?
Cited 3 timesPublishedMcGill v. Bison Fast Freight, Inc.
245 N.C. 469 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1957
Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E. 2d 71 . 2. … Roth v. McCord, 232 N.C. 678 , 62 S.E. 2d 64 . *474 In the Brown and Roth cases, for the reasons stated, the death was regarded as arising out of and in the course of decedent’s employment by the lessee.
Cited 28 timesPublished233 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1951
Brown, 225 N.C. 22 , 33 S.E. 2d 121 ; S. v. Holt, 195 N.C. 240 , 135 S.E. 324 ; S. v. Mills, 181 N.C. 530 , 106 S.E. 677 . A warrant, however, cannot be amended so as to charge a different offense. S. v. … S. v. Bowser, supra; S. v. Stiles, supra; S. v. Summerlin, supra.
Cited 15 timesPublishedAtlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Thrower
213 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1938
Pelletier v. Saunders, 67 N. C., 261 ; Jones v. Statesville, 97 N. C., 86 ; Mfg. Co. v. Brower, 105 N. C., 440 . Speaking to the subject in Roberts v. Moore, 185 N. … Brown v. Cogdell, 136 N. C., 33 ; Mfg. Co. v. Brower, 105 N. C., 440 ; Jones v. Statesville, 97 N. C., 86 .”
Cited 8 timesPublished189 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1925
Bank v. Gilmer , 116 N.C. 684 , 707 ; S. c . 117 N.C. 416 ; Cooper v. McKinnon , 122 N.C. 447 ; Pearre v. Folb , 123 N.C. 237 ; Brown v. Nimocks , 124 N.C. 417 ; Taylor v. Lauer , 127 N.C. 157 ; Odom v. … Chipron v. Feikert , 68 Ill. 284 ; Frank v. Miner , 50 Ill. 444 ; McTaggart v. Rose , 14 Ind. 230 ; Brown v. Webb , 20 Ohio, 389 . Subsequent possession cures all such defects. Morrow v. Reed , 30 Wis. 81 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedGreat Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Maxwell
199 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1930
Rep., 496; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S., 563, 573 , 54 L. Ed., 883, 887 , 30 Sup. Ct. Rep., 578; Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield Twp., 247 U. S., 350, 353 , 62 L. Ed., 1154, 1156 , 38 Sup. Ct. … Brown-Forman Co., v. Kentucky, 217 U. S., 54 , L. Ed., 883. Tbe tax is not unreasonable or discriminatory. Ohio Oil Co., v. Conway, supra. Tbe judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDavis Ex Rel. Davis v. Askin's Retail Stores, Inc.
211 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1937
J., 1152; Brown v. Lumber Co., 167 N. C., 9 ; Hall v. Hall, 179 N. C., 571 ; Alexander v. Vann, 180 N. C., 187 ; Hedgepeth v. Coleman, 183 N. C., 309 ; Pentuff v. Park, 194 N. C., 146 . In Paul v. Auction Co., 181 N. … In Pentuff v.
Cited 12 timesPublished207 N.C. 660 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 1935
On authority of Brown v. Guthery, 190 N. C., 822 , tbe trial court held tbat, under tbe will of Solomon Jones, bis widow, Assena T. … Watson v. Smith, 110 N. C., 6 , 14 S. E., 640 . Nor is plaintiff’s title affected by tbe testator’s direction to sell tbe land and divide tbe proceeds. Witty v. Witty, 184 N. C., 375 , 114 S. E., 482 ; 40 Cyc., 1999.
Cited 0 timesPublished221 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1942
Copper Co. v. Marlin, 70 N. C., 300 ; Card v. Finch, 142 N. C., 140 ; Stancill v. Gay, supra; Guerin v. Guerin, supra; Dunn v. Wilson, 210 N. C., 493 , 187 S. E., 802 ; Clark v. Homes, 189 N. C., 703 , 128 S. … Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 . This is by motion in the cause. Harrell *365 v. Welstead, supra; Davis v. Brigman, 204 N. C., 680 , 169 S. E., 421 ; Downing v. White, supra, and cases cited; Adams v. Cleve, 218 N.
Cited 47 timesPublished140 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1906
Blackwell v. Dibbrell, 103 N. C., 270 ; Hicks v. Beam, 112 N. C., 644 ; Montague v. Brown, 104 N. C., 161 ; Cotton Mills v. Cotton Mills, 115 N. C., 487 ; Curtis v. Piedmont Co., 109 N. C., 405 ; Harrison v. … C., 128 ; Hawkins v. Hughes, 87 N. C., 115 .
Cited 9 timesPublished153 N.C. 339 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1910
Brown, J. … Capehart v. Biggs, 77 N. C., 261 ; Kornegay v. Spicer, 76 N. C., 96 ; Whitehead v. Hellen, 76 N. C., 99 ; Kidder v. McIlhenny, 81 N. C., 131 ; Manning v. Elliott, 92 N. C., 51 , are precedents in point.
Cited 7 timesPublished162 N.C. 368 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1913
J., concurring; WALKER and BROWN, JJ., dissenting. This is a motion to remove the action from the Superior Court of Swain County to the Federal Court upon the ground that the defendant is a Virginia corporation. … The case of Herrick v. R. R. , 158 N.C. 310 , is not in conflict with this view.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna