Case law

Truesdale v. University of North Carolina

323 N.C. 706 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1989

377 S.E.2d 229 (1989) 323 N.C. 706 Tommie Jean TRUESDALE v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, Winston-Salem State University, James W. Lewis, and Robert Fenning. No. 438P88. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 4, 1989. … Moore & Brown, Winston Salem, William G. Simpson, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff. Thomas J. Ziko, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants.

State v. Baker

312 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1984

State v. Jerrett, 309 N.C. 239, 250 , 307 S.E. 2d 339, 345 (1983). State v. Oliver, 302 N.C. 28, 37 , 274 S.E. 2d 183, 189 (1981). … Brown testified that defendant was aware of the charges against him, but in his opinion defendant consciously decided not to talk about the events occurring on the day of the crime.

In Re Will of Redding

216 N.C. 497 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1939

Lumber Co. v. Childerhose, 167 N. C., 34 . … Mayo v. Jones, 78 N. C., 402 ; In re Will of Staub, 172 N. C., 138 ; In re Will of Brown, 200 N. C., 440 .

In Re Will of Stallcup

202 N.C. 6 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1931

Boone v. Collins, post 12. The burden of proving the affirmative of a single issue cannot rest on both parties at the same time. Speas v. Bank , 188 N.C. 524 , 125 S.E. 398 . … See, also, In re Will of Brown , 200 N.C. 440 . New trial. *Page 8

Chiles v. United States Furniture Manufacturing Co.

167 N.C. 574 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1914

Caho v. R. R., 147 N. C., 20 , and authorities cited. … Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 137 U. S., 98 ; Martindale v. Wilson Case Co., 134 Pa. St., 348; Brown v. Ice Co., 113 Iowa, 615 ; Taussig v. R. R., 166 Mo., 28 ; Cooke on Corporations (6 Ed.), sec. 657.

State v. Atlas

283 N.C. 165 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1973

See: State v. Wright, 274 N.C. 380 , 163 S.E. 2d 897 ; State v. Yoes, 271 N.C. 616 , 157 S.E. 2d 386 ; State v. Colson, 262 N.C. 506, 516 , 138 S.E. 2d 121 ; State v. Wilson, 262 N.C. 419 , 137 S.E. 2d 109 ; State v. … We there held that the authority to enact such ordinance was conferred upon the boards of commissioners of the respective counties by G.S. 153-9(55).

Davis v. . Brigman

204 N.C. 680 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1933

Doyle, v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393; Brickhouse v. Sutton, 99 N. C., 103 ; Spencer v. Credle, 102 N. C., 68 ; Whitehurst v. Transportation Co., 109 N. C., 342 ; Bailey v. Hopkins, 152 N. C., 748 ; Stocks v. Stocks, 179 N. … C., 285 ; Caviness v. Hunt, 180 N. C., 384 ; Jordan v. McKenzie, 199 N. C., 752 . It will be observed that there is no allegation in the complaint of fraud or any other ground of equitable relief.

Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Schneider

235 N.C. 446 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1952

Cheek, 212 N.C. 510 , 193 S.E. 705 ; Heyer v. Bulluck, supra; Brown v. Brown, 195 N.C. 315 , 142 S.E. 4 ; Cannon v. Cannon, supra; Citizens Nat. Bank v. Corl, 225 N.C. 96 , 33 S.E.2d 613 ; Buffaloe v. … Carter v.

Town of Morganton v. Avery

179 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1920

Brown, J. … In Kerwin v.

State v. . Duckworth

60 N.C. 240 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864

Cited: S. v. Brown, post , 449. *Page 149

McLean v. McLean

237 N.C. 122 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 30, 1953

Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360; S. v. Brown, 227 N.C. 383 , 42 S.E. 2d 402 ; Williams v. … See S. v. Hedgepeth, 230 N.C. 33 , 51 S.E. 2d 914 ; S. v. Pillow, 234 N.C. 146 , 66 S.E. 2d 657 .

State v. Benfield

278 N.C. 199 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1971

The decision in State v. Stevens, supra, in respect of the question now under consideration, seems to have been based largely on State v. Brown, 150 N.C. 867 , 64 S.E. 775 (1909). In State v. … It would seem that Brown was not a solid basis for the decision in Stevens .

Lexington Insulation Company v. Davidson County

243 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1955

S. v. Williams, 153 N.C. 595 , 68 S.E. 900 . The prohibition of G.S. 14-234 extends to an officer of a corporation who makes a contract between the corporation and a municipality or board of which he is a member. S. v. … Snipes v. Winston, supra; Davidson v. Guilford, supra; King v. Guilford, 152 N.C. 438 ; S. v. Williams, supra. Annos. 84 A.L.R. 969 , 110 A.L.R. 164 , 154 A.L.R. 375 ; 12 A.J. 498.

State v. Batdorf

293 N.C. 486 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 11, 1977

State v. Brown, 2 N.C. 100 (1794); State v. Knight, 1 N.C. 143 (1799); State v. Cutshall, 110 N.C. 538 , 15 S.E. 261 (1892); State v. Jones, 227 N.C. 94 , 40 S.E. 2d 700 (1946). … Fox v. Ohio, 46 U.S. (5 How.) 410, 435 , 12 L.Ed. 213, 224 (1847) (dissenting opinion); State v. Brown, supra. See Green v. United States, 355 U.S. 184, 187-88 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 199, 204 , 78 S.Ct. 221, 223 (1957); State v.

State Ex Rel. Gower v. Carter

194 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1927

Rhodes v. Love, 153 N. C., 469 ; Johnston v. Board of Elections, 172 N. C., 162 , 167.” Defendant in his brief says: “The official returns in the election for mayor of Clayton showed 238 votes for F. G. … Chitty v. Parker, 172 N. C., p. 126; Reynolds v. Cotton Mills, 177 N. C., 412 ; Groves v. Comrs., 180 N. C., 568 ; S. v. Jackson, 183 N. C., 695 ; In re Ellis, 187 N. C., 840 . See Ransom v. Comrs. of Weldon, ante, 237.

Dillon v. . Wentz

227 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1947

Pennie v. Reis, 132 U. S., 464 , 33 L. Ed., 426 ; Passaic Nat. Bank Trust Co. v. Eelman, 116 N. J., 279, 183 Atl., 677 ; Retirement Board of Alleghany County v. McGovern, 316 Penn., 161 , 174 A., 400 ; Griffith v. … Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Asso., 124 Minn., 381 , 145 Minn., 35 ; Trotzier v. McElroy, 182 Ga., 719 , 186 S. E., 817 ; Retirement Board of Alleghany County v. McGovern, supra.

Austin v. . Austin

160 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 1912

Peebles v. Graham, 128 N. C., 225 . The burden was on the plaintiffs to rebut that presumption. Blue v. Ritter, 118 N. C., 582 . … In Stowe v. Davis, 32 N. C., 431 , tbe devise was of “tbe plantation where I now live.” Tbe testator bad two adjacent tracts, known as “tbe borne place” and tbe “Brown place.”

Moore, Ex Parte

64 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1870

In Stiner v. … In Cox v. Brown, 5 Ire. 194, on a petition for a widow’s year’s provision, the creditors' of the intestate were allowed to intervene without objection.

Patterson v. . Bodenhammer

33 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1850

Whatever possession the piainliff may have acquired by putting into an unfinished house, which had never been inhabited by him or any other person, some empty barrels and boxes, and nailing on the boards, as set forth in … The action of quare clausum fre- git, is a x'emedy for an injury to the possession; Dobbs v. Gullidge, 4 Dev. and Bat. 68, and therefore cannot be maintained by one who has it not. Tredwell v. Reddick, 1 Ired. 56 .

North Carolina Ex Rel. Taylor v. Carolina Racing Ass'n

241 N.C. 80 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1954

It is to be noted that the plaintiff in Amide v. Lancaster, supra, sought to enjoin the operations of a governmental board acting ‘under color of legislative authority.’ … Levering v. Board of Supervisors of Elections of Baltimore City, 137 Md. 281 , 112 A. 301 .