Case law

Wharton v. City of Greensboro

149 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1908

Brown, J. This action was originally brought to restrain the issuing of certain bonds. … Noland County v. State, 83 Texas, 183 ; Knapp v. Grant, 27 Wis., 147 ; Rogers v. Keokuck, U. S., 18 L. Ed., 74 ; Bank v. Brunswick, 101 U. S., 129 ; Deyo v. Otoe County, 37 Fed., 246 ; McMullen v.

Pittsburg Lumber Co. v. Rowe

151 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1909

Brown, J. 1. The contention that the case on appeal was not served in time, and therefore the court can consider only errors apparent' on the face of the record proper, cannot be sustained. … Clark’s Code, sec. 596, and cases cited; Guano Co. v. Hicks, 120 N. C., 29 ; Turrentine v. Railroad, 92 N. C., 642 . 2.

Ashford v. . Pittman

160 N.C. 45 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1912

Brown, J. The plaintiff’s horse was stabled with the defendant for safekeeping as a bailee for hire. … McMillan, v. R. R., 126 N. C., 726 ; Aycock v. R. R., 89 N. C., 327 ; Simpson v. Lumber Co., 133 N. C., 101.

Matthews v. . Peterson

150 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1909

Winslow v. Benton, 130 N. C., 58 . … Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 . The administrator, by virtue of the above section (367), could not avail himself of the statute as against the debt evidenced by the judgment.

State v. Black

305 N.C. 614 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1982

State v. Moore, 300 N.C. 694 , 268 S.E. 2d 196 (1980); State v. Taylor, 88 N.C. 694 (1883). … State v. Tinsley, 283 N.C. 564 , 196 S.E. 2d 746 (1973).

Ward v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

226 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1946

Hardie v. Telegraph Co., 190 N. C., 45 , 128 S. E., 500 , and cases there cited. There could have been no recovery for mental anguish. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S., 542 , 58 L. … Ed., 1457 ; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Speight, 254 U. S., 17 , 65 L. Ed., 105 ; Hardie v. Western Union Telegraph Co., supra; nor could there have been any recovery of punitive damages, Aldrich v.

Lunsford v. Marshall

230 N.C. 610 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1949

Sutton v. Madre, 47 N.C. 320 ; Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N.C. 245 ; S. v. Prince, 182 N.C. 788 , 108 S.E. 330 ; Kirby v. Reynolds, 212 N.C. 271 (280), 193 S.E. 412 ; Carruthers v. R. R., 215 N.C. 675 , 2 S.E. 2d 878 . … In Seagroves v. Winston, 167 N.C. 206 , 83 S.E. 251 , Chief Justice Ciarle observed, “The submission of any question of fact to a jury without sufficient evidence to warrant a finding is error.” In Garvey v.

Holly Springs Land & Improvement Co. v. Brewer

183 N.C. 248 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1922

Daniels v. R. R., 136 N. C., 517 ; Freeman v. Brown, 151 N. C., 111 ; Morton v. Dumber Co., 152 N. C., 54 ; Christman v. Hilliard, 167 N. C., 4 ; Collins v. Casualty Co., 172 N. C., 543 ; Bush v. McPherson, 176 N. … C., 563 ; Newby v. Realty Co., 182 N. C., 34 . The judgment of nonsuit is reversed, and this will be certified for further proceedings. Reversed.

State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.

192 N.C. 246 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1926

Hoke v. Glenn, 167 N. C., 594 ; Brewer v. Wynne, 154 N. C., 472 . … McIver v. Hardware Co., 144 N. C., 478 ; Whitlock v. Alexander, 160 N. C., 465 ; Besseliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65 .

Bank v. . Lutterloh

95 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

( Wittkowski v. Smith , 84 N.C. 671 ; Brown v. Teague , 52 N.C. 573 ; cited and approved). This action is against T. J. Jones, the drawee and acceptor, and the drawer of a check or draft in favor of B. T. C. … Brown v. Teague , 52 N.C. 573 ; and numerous cases cited in 2 U.S. Dig., Title Bills and Notes, § 2003. There is no error, and the judgment is affirmed. No error. Affirmed. Cited: Adrian v.

State v. . Sentell

208 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1935

S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747 , 175 S. E., 116 . … S. v. Watson, ante, *141 70; S. v. Etheridge, 207 N. C., 801 ; S. v. Hooker, 207 N. C., 648 ; S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 316 , 166 S. E., 292 .

Palmer v. . Palmer

179 N.C. 666 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1920

Brown, J. This action was brought to recover damages of the defendant, J. F. … Irvin v. R. R., 164 N. C., 5 ; Cyc., 1471. No error.

Alberts v. . Alberts

217 N.C. 443 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1940

The constitutionality of the above law (sec. 491 [a], supra) was upheld in Ashley v. Brown, 198 N. C., 369 ; Bigham v. Foor, 201 N. C., 14 ; Smith v. Haughton, 206 N. C., 587 (591); Dowling v. Winters, 208 N. C., 521 . … Sobeck v. Koellmer, 265 N. Y. Supp., 778 ; Garon v. Poivier (New Hamp.), 164 Atl., 765 ; Peeples v. Ramspacher, 29 Fed. Supp., 632; Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U. S., 352 ; Malak v. Upton, 3 N. Y. Supp. (2nd), 248; Fine v.

Lewis v. Barnhill

267 N.C. 457 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1966

In Leggette v. … These assignments are overruled on the authority of Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485 , 141 S.E. 2d 875 , and Morgan v. Bell Bakeries, Inc., 246 N.C. 429 , 98 S.E. 2d 464 , and the authorities there cited.

In Re Certificate of Need for Aston Park Hospital, Inc.

282 N.C. 542 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 1973

As Justice Higgins said in Roller v. … See also, Cheek v. City of Charlotte, 273 N.C. 293 , 160 S.E. 2d 18 . In State v.

Rockingham v. . Hood, Comr.

204 N.C. 618 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1933

There was no appeal from the State Board of Assessment and defendant is now precluded from raising the question. Mfg. Co. v. Comrs., 196 N. C., 744 . In Comrs. v. Tobacco Co., 116 N. … Attorney-General v. Bank, 21 N. C., 216 ; Attorney-General v. Bank, 40 N. C., 71 .

Barnard v. Howard Sober, Inc.

226 N.C. 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1946

Merchant v. Lassiter, 224 N. C., 343 , 30 S. E. (2d), 217 ; Hutchins v. Taylor-Buick Co., 198 N. C., 777 , 153 S. E., 397 ; Brown v. Express Co., 192 N. C., 25 , 133 S. E., 414 ; Beck v. Wilkins, 179 N. C., 231 , 102 S.

Lewis v. . Stancil

154 N.C. 326 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1911

HOKE and BROWN, JJ., dissenting. Benjamin Pollard devised the land in question to his grandson, Joseph A. Lewis, in the following language: "I give and devise to my grandson, Joseph A. … In Silliman v.

State v. Thomas

331 N.C. 671 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 25, 1992

He removed Alford as counsel and appointed Anthony Brown as main attorney in the capital case, with appointment of assistant counsel to follow. … At that time Anthony Brown and Henry Fisher represented defendant. On 8 March 1990, Fisher and Brown asked permission to withdraw as counsel.

Boling v. . Luther

4 N.C. 635 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1817

Onslow v. Horne , 3 Wils., 186. … NOTE. — See Brown v. Dula , 7 N.C. 574 . *Page 458