Case law

In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.

253 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1961

The only discretion given to the governing boards of such municipalities is the permissive or discretionary right to use this new method of annexation provided such boards conform to the procedure and meet the requirements … Dorsey v. Henderson, 148 N.C. 423 , and Perry v. Comrs., ibid., 521; Manly v.

Helms v. . Green

105 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

In Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 372 , it is said that, in Reiger v. … Brown v. Mitchell, supra; Harding v. Long, 103 N. C., 1 ; Berry v. Hall, at this term.

First National Bank v. Michael

96 N.C. 53 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

This view was taken by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in Ryland v. Brown, 2 Head., 270; which case is in material respects like the present one. See also Goodloe v. Taylor, 3 Hawks, 458 ; Elliott v. … Blackmer v. Phillips, 67 N. C., 340 .

Lummus v. Firemen's Fund Insurance

167 N.C. 654 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 1914

Bryant v. Ins. Co., 147 N. C., 181 . … See, also, Fishblate v. Fidelity Co., 140 N. C., 589 .

Ericson v. . Ericson

226 N.C. 474 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1946

See also Plott v. Construction Co., 198 N. C., 782 , 153 S. E., 396 ; Waters v. Waters, supra; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788 , 156 S. E., 126 ; Everett v. Fair Association, 202 N. C., 838 , 162 S. E., 896 ; Riggan v. … E., 358 ; Armstrong v. Service Stores, 203 N. C., 231 , 165 S. E., 680 ; Parks v. Seagraves, 203 N. C., 647 , 166 S. E., 747 ; Payne v. Brown, 205 N. C., 785 , 172 S. E., 348 ; Ins. Co. v. Bullard, supra; Goodman v.

In Re Troutman

264 N.C. 289 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1965

In Pacific Mills v. Director of Division of Employ. Sec., 77 N.E. 2d 413 (Mass.), decisions of the administrative board awarding unemployment benefits were upheld. … In Bayly Manufacturing Co. v. Department of Emp., 395 P. 2d 216 (Colo.), the decision of the administrative board awarding unemployment benefits was upheld.

Grandin v. . Triplett

173 N.C. 732 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1917

C., pp. 218-224; Maddox v. R. R., 115 N. C., 642 ; Hodges v. Spicer, 79 N. C., 223 ; McConnell v. McConnell, 73 N. C., 338 ; Cowan v. Tucker, 30 N. C., 426 . … In Shelton's case the declarations were admitted because the question involved concerned the validity of a will, and Associate Justice Brown; distinguishing between a deed and a will, said: “Declarations of this kind (by

Harkins v. . Cathey

119 N.C. 650 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Brown, J. M. Ingles, C. C. McCathey, W. P. Kilpatrick, N. A. Miller, R. V. Wolfe, Jas. Reese, W. C. Penland, James Patton (or Jos. Patton, whichever it may be), C. C. Murray, G. W. Curtin, Jesse Williams, H.C. … Brown, J. M. Ingles, C. C. McCathey, W. P. Kilpatrick, N. A. Miller, R. V. Wolfe, James Reese, W. C. Penland, James or Joseph Patton, C. C. (or J. C.) Murray, G. W. Justice, Jesse Williams, H.C. Blankenship, A. J.

Hartsfield v. City of New Bern

186 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1923

J., in Humphries v. Baxter, 28 N. C., 437 . The same ruling has been made in S. v. Wallace, 94 N. C., 828 ; Hancock v. R. R., 124 N. C., 225 ; S. v. Patterson, 134 N. … Mississippi & River Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S., 403 ; Backus v. Union Depot Co., 169 U. S., 557 ; R. R. v. N. Y., 176 U. S., 349 ; Sears v. Akron, 246 U. S., 251 .

Woodard v. North Carolina Local Governmental Employees' Retirement System

335 N.C. 161 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1993

WOODARD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. … NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a body politic and corpoate; DENNIS DUCKER, Director

State v. McAllister

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 2020

Brown, when you [sic] going to stand up and take responsibility, Mr. Brown? Mr. Brown wasn’t a tool. He was the engine. He was the engine that made everything possible. … Naturally understood, defense counsel’s statements during closing argument urged not-guilty verdicts across the board.

Ashford v. . Pittman

160 N.C. 45 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1912

Brown, J. The plaintiff’s horse was stabled with the defendant for safekeeping as a bailee for hire. … McMillan, v. R. R., 126 N. C., 726 ; Aycock v. R. R., 89 N. C., 327 ; Simpson v. Lumber Co., 133 N. C., 101.

Bailey v. Bailey

243 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1956

This Court said in Bond v. … G.S. 50-16; Brooks v. Brooks, 226 N.C. 280 , 37 S.E. 2d 909 . “If either party abandons his or her family,” it is a ground for divorce from bed and board. G.S. 50-7, sub-sec. 1; Cameron v.

Puitt v. Commissioners of Gaston County

94 N.C. 709 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1886

To the same effect is Worth v. … To the same effect are Roberts v. Boston , 5 Cush., 198 ; State v. Duffy , 7 Nev. 342 ; Clerk v. Board of Directors , 24 Iowa 266 ; Dallas v. Fosdick , 40 How. Pr. 249 ; People v. Gaston , 134 Abb. Pr. N. S., 100.

Horne v. . R. R.

170 N.C. 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 12, 1916

In McNeill v. R. … In Boney v. R.

Security Finance Co. v. McGaskill

192 N.C. 557 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1926

Stubbs, 6 Watts, 48 ; Farly v. Bryant, 32 Me., 474; Coffing v. Taylor, 16 Ill., 457 ; Slafyton v. Scott, 13 Ves., 427; Alvanly v. Kinnaid, 2 Mac. & G., 7; 29 Beav., 490. To like effect are our own decisions. Hoggard v. … Brown, ante, 494; Hollingsworth v. Supreme Council, 175 N. C., 615 , at page 637 ; Colt v. Kimball, 190 N. C., 169 , and cases there cited.

Sowers v. . Earnhart

64 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1870

By presumption of law, this note was solvable in Confederate money: Robeson v. Brown, 63 N. C. 554 . … There was opposing evidence introduced by the defendant, and this question of fact was fairly submitted by His Honor to the jury, and they gave a verdict for the plaintiff, for the amount specified in the note : See Garrett v.

Dickson v. . Crawley

112 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1893

Gaither v. Sain, 91 N. C., 304 ; Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 . The said administrator Moore died in 1869, and there was no administration upon the estate of Dickson until 1886. … Long v. Clegg, 94 N. C., 763 ; Baird v. Reynolds, 99 N.

Fowle Memorial Hospital Co. v. Nicholson

190 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925

Besseliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65; Hilton v. Gordon, 177 N. C., 342 ; Steel Co. v. Hardware Co., 175 N. C., 450 ; Bassett v. Cooperage Co., 188 N. C., 511 ; Johnston v. Overman, 55 N. C., 182 ; Blount v. Robeson, 56 N. … Norcum v. Savage, 140 N. C., 472, 474 ; Norton v. McDevit, 122 N. C., 759 ; Latham v. Latham, 184 N. C., 56 ; Sexton v. Farrington, 185 N. C., 339 ; Little v. Bank, 187 N. C., 1 ; Lynch v. Johnson, 171 N.

Mitchell v. . Mitchell

96 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 ; Logan v. Wallis, Ibid., 416; Street v. Tuck, 84 N. C, 605; Burns v. Williams, 88 N. C., 159 . … Morris v. Gentry, 89 N. C., 248 . Error. Remanded.