Case law

Breeding Assn. v. . R. R.

152 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1910

JUSTICE BROWN. … Cited: Kime v. R. R. , 153 N.C. 400 .

Pressley v. Pressley

261 N.C. 326 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1964

Page v. Page, 161 N.C. 170 , 76 S.E. 619 .” In Page v. … Caddell v. Caddell, 236 N.C. 686 , 73 S.E. 2d 923 .

Laughinghouse v. Great National Insurance

200 N.C. 434 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 11, 1931

Brown v. Commercial Mut. Ins. … Co. v. Assurance Co., 110 N. C., 176 ; Clegg v. R. R., 135 N. C., 148, 154 ; Modlin v. Ins. Co., 151 N. C., 35 ; Shuford v. Ins. Co., 167 N. C., 547 .

Abney Mills v. Tri-State Motor Transit Company

265 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 1965

In Ruark v. … Harrison v.

State Ex Rel. Marler-Dalton-Gilmer Co. v. Golden

172 N.C. 823 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1916

As to the estoppel, see Royster v. Wright, 118 N. C., 152 ; Allen v. Royster, 107 N. C., 278 ; Collins v. Smith, 109 N. C., 468 . It is said in Bern v. … Jones v. Sugg, 136 N. C., 143 . The judgments were evidence of the indebtedness and very conclusive proof. Brown v. Harding, 170 N. C., 253 (s. c., 171 N. C., 686 ).

Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. Carson

207 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1934

This question is answered in"the negative upon the authority of Brown v. Turner, 202 N. C., 227 .

Chapman v. . Tea Co.

210 N.C. 842 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1936

The judgment dismissing the action is supported by the findings of fact and is affirmed on the authority of Hampton v. Spinning Co. , 198 N.C. 235 , 151 S.E. 266 ; Brown v. … Johnson , 207 N.C. 807 , 178 S.E. 570 ; Batson v. Laundry Co. , 209 N.C. 223 , 183 S.E. 413 . Affirmed.

Pope v. . McPhail

173 N.C. 238 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1917

We so held at the present term, in Vinson v. Pugh, p. 190, As sociate Justice Brown delivering the opinion, and Flowe v. Hartwick, 167 N. C., 452 , and Magee v. Blankenship, 95 N. … Moore v. Ward, 71 W. Va., 393 ; Pavill v. McKinley, 50 Va., 1 ; Bowles v. Woodson, 47 Va., 78 ; Johnston v. Jones, 85 Ala., 286 , and Campbell v. Thomas, 42 Wis., 437 , seem to sustain the position.

Bank v. . Wysong Miles Co.

177 N.C. 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1919

So that, upon a fair and proper construction of the verdict, which should be read in the light of the evidence and what presumably was the charge ( Southerland v. Brown , 176 N.C. 187 ; Jones v. R. … Bunn v. Todd, supra , has frequently been approved since it was decided, the two most recent cases which expressly endorse its statement of the rule and apply it being Brown v. Adams , 174 N.C. 490 , and Pope v.

Tscheiller v. National Weaving Co.

214 N.C. 449 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1938

Code of 1935, sec. 8081 (r); Brown v. R. R., 202 N. C., 256 , 162 S. E., 613 ; McNeely v. Asbestos Co., 206 N. C., 568 , 174 S. E., 509 . … McNeely v. Asbestos Co., supra; Slade v. Hosiery Mills, 209 N. C., 823 , 184 S. E., 844 ; Johnson v. Hughes, 207 N. C., 544 , 177 S. E., 632 .

Thomson v. . Harnett County

209 N.C. 662 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1936

The second question: Under Article V, sec. 6, in Brooks v. … In Hill v.

Seibold v. City of Kinston

268 N.C. 615 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1966

In Keenan v. … Greitzer v. Eastham, 254 N.C. 752 , 119 S.E. 2d 884 ; Paper Co. v. McAllister, 253 N.C. 529 , 117 S.E. 2d 431 .

State v. Crowe

664 S.E.2d 312 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 2008

664 S.E.2d 312 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. Lauren Elizabeth CROWE. No. 98P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 11, 2008. Christopher G. … Browning, Jr., Solicitor General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of NC. Vincent F. Rabil, for Crowe. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 656 S.E.2d 688 .

Buchanan v. . Lumber Co.

168 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1915

Graves v. R. R. , 136 N.C. 3 ; Ramsbottom v. R. R. , 138 N.C. 39 ; Harvell v. Lumber Co. , 154 N.C. 254 ; Alexander v. Statesville , 165 N.C. 528 ; Grand Trunk R. R. v. Ives , 144 U.S. 408 ; Davidson v. … Boney v. R. R. , 155 N.C. 95 ; Farris v. R. R. , 151 N.C. 484 ; Coley v. R. R. , 129 N.C. 407 ; Brewster (47) v. Elizabeth City , 137 N.C. 392 .

Hines v. City of Rocky Mount

162 N.C. 409 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1913

of the public health, and may create and appoint a board of health to exercise and carry out such powers under the supervision and control of the first mentioned board. … Little v. Lenoir, 151 N. C., 415 ; Nevins v. Peoria, 41 Ill., 502 ; Winchell v. Waukesha, 110 Wis., 101 ; Eaton v. R. R., 51 N. II., 504; Bohan v. Port Jervis Co., 122 N. Y., 18 ; Mining Co. v.

Harden v. . Railroad

129 N.C. 354 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1901

To the same purport are: United States. — Thomas v. Railroad , 101 U.S. 83 ; R. Co. v. Brown , 84 U.S. 445 ; R. Co. v. Barron , 72 U.S. 90 ; R. Co. v. Winans , 58 U.S. 39 . Georgia. — Singleton v. … Missouri. — Brown v. R. Co. , 27 Mo., App., 394. Nebraska. — Charlotte v. R. Co. , 26 Neb. 159 . New York. — Abbott v. R. Co. , 80 N.Y. 27 , 36 Am. Rep., 572. *Page 362 North Carolina. — Aycock v.

In Re Will of Rowland

202 N.C. 373 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1932

Collins v. Collins, 125 N. C., 98 , 34 S. E., 195 ; Randolph v. Hughes, 89 N. C., 428 ; Edwards v. Edwards, 25 N. C., 82 ; Redmond v. Collins, supra; Dickenson v. Stewart, 5 N. C., 99 . … E., 769 , Brown, J., delivering the opinion of the Court, said: “The probate of a will in common form is an ex parte proceeding, and no one interested is before the clerk except the propounders and witnesses.

Perry v. . Comrs.

183 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1922

Paschal v. Johnson, supra; Hicks v. Board of Education, supra . … Board of Education , 170 N.C. 123 ), or else there should be an election as contemplated by C.S. 5530. But defendants contend that under the decisions of Riddle v.

Grantham v. . Grantham

205 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1933

Browning v. Berry, 107 N. C., 235 ; Jordan v. Furnace Co., 126 N. C., 147 ; Winders v. Hill, 144 N. C., 617 .” … Browne on the Statute of Frauds (5 ed., sec. 126).” The rule was reaffirmed in Deal v.

Winberry v. Farley Stores, Inc.

204 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

Harden v. Furniture Co., 199 N. C., 733 ; Hunt v. State, 201 N. C., 707 ; Brown v. Ice Co., 203 N. C., 97 ; Kenan v. Motor Co., 203 N. C . v. Hines Bros., 203 N. C., 148 ; Mmiford v. Construction Co., 203 N. … C., 247 ; Richey v. Cotton Mills, 203 N. C., 595 ; Johnson v. Bagging Co., 203 N. C., 579 . In Greer v. Laundry Co., 202 N.