Case law

Simpson v. . Cureton

97 N.C. 112 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

In Medley v. Dunlap, 90 N. … Cox v. Brown, 5 Ired., 194; Kimball v. Deming, Ibid., 418. Nor if she die after allotment and before confirmation, does the right survive. Dunn Ex parte, 63 N. C., 137 .

Piner v. . Brittain

165 N.C. 401 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1914

This very point was passed upon by Brown, J., in Conservatory v. Dickenson, 158 N. … Phipps, 16 Ore., 437 ; Bank v. Anderson, 28 S. C., 143; Andrews v. Hayden, 88 Ky., 455 ; Bank v. Auchley, 92 Mo., 126 ; Lines v. Smith, 4 Fla., 50 .

Crook v. Warren Ex Rel. Warren

212 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1937

Walker v. Mebane, 90 N. C., 259 ; Saleeby v. Brown, 190 N. C., 138 . If the note was paid and satisfied in full, the trustee’s deed was null and void and conveyed no right, title, or interest to the plaintiff.

Absher Ex Rel. Absher v. Miller

220 N.C. 197 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1941

constrained to hold that the court below was in error in the ruling complained of, and that the issue of contributory negligence should have been submitted, with appropriate instruction, under the rule laid down in Boykin v. … E., 177 ; Morris v. Sprott, 207 N. C., 358 , 177 S. E., 13 ; Brown v. R. R., 195 N. C., 699 , 143 S. E., 536 ; Foard v. Power Co., 170 N. C., 48 , 86 S. E., 804 .

R. R. v. . Cherokee County

218 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1940

Article V , sec. 6 , of North Carolina Constitution. … Upon authority of Power Co. v. Clay County, supra , the judgment below is Affirmed.

Phillips & Crew Co. v. Hyatt

167 N.C. 570 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1914

Brown, J. We agree with his Honor that the defendant is not an innocent purchaser for value, and that he acquired no title under the sale against the plaintiff. … Rev., sec. 648; Barbee v. Scoggins, 121 N. C., 143 ; Alston v. Morphew, 113 N. C., 460 ; McNeely v. Hart, 30 N. C., 492 . Affirmed.

Lynn v. . Lowe

88 N.C. 478 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

Justice RUFFIN dissenting). ( Colson v. Wade , 1 Mur., 43 ; Burke v. Stokely , 65 N.C. 569 ; Aycock v. Harrison , 71 N.C. 432 ; Doyle v. Brown , 72 N.C. 393 ; Godley v. Taylor , 3 Dev., 178 ; Kahnweiler v. … In Doyle v.

Eason v. . Eason

159 N.C. 539 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1912

Brown, J. … Acker v. Pridgen, 158 N. C., 338 ; Triplett v. Williams, 149 N. C., 394 ; Gudger v. White, 141 N. C., 513 .

Dare County v. Mater

235 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1952

While the members of the Board of Commissioners may, as individuals, become relators, G.S. 19-2, they may not prosecute this action in the name of the County. … Ch. 940, Session Laws 1949, authorizes the playing of the game of Bingo in Dare County when the operator is duly licensed by the Board of Commissioners of Dare County.

State v. Exum

343 N.C. 291 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1996

Thomas Brown, defense expert in the area of forensic psychiatry and substance abuse. … Brown. An in-chambers conference is a “critical stage” of a defendant’s capital trial at which he has a constitutional right to be present. See State v. Buchanan, 330 N.C. 202, 221 , 410 S.E.2d 832, 843 (1991).

Dowd v. . Holbrook

152 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 11, 1910

Brown, J. An examination of the pleadings and evidence shows quite clearly that the controversy involves almost exclusively a question of fact, and that it is settled against the 'defendant by the verdict of the jury. … Deep River Gold Mining Co. v. Fox, 39 N. C., 61 ; Carroll v. McKale, 69 N. W., 644 ; Edwards v. Dobley, 24 N. E., 821 ; Bergner v. Bergner, 61 Atl., 999 ; Cyc., vbl. 31, p. 1471.

State v. . Trexler

4 N.C. 188 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1815

King v. … NOTE. — Upon the subject of an indictable trespass to personal property, see S. v. Flowers , 6 N.C. 225 ; S. v. McDowell , 8 N.C. 449 ; S. v. Mills , 13 N.C. 420 ; S. v. Love , 19 N.C. 267 ; S. v.

State v. Daniels

300 N.C. 105 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1980

The man had brown hair and was wearing brown khaki pants, a blue jean jacket but no shirt. … State v. Barbour, 278 N.C. 449 , 180 S.E. 2d 115 (1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1023 (1972); State v. McCaskill, 270 N.C. 788 , 154 S.E. 2d 907 (1967); State v.

Beeson v. Beeson

246 N.C. 330 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1957

See among other cases Silver v. Silver (1941), 220 N.C. 191 , 16 S.E. 2d 834 ; Shore v. Shore (1942), 220 N.C. 802 , 18 S.E. 2d 353 . … . . . and the husband may seek a decree for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, in any action brought by his wife under this section.”

State Ex Rel. Lee v. Martin

186 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1923

S. v. Bradley, 10 Peters, 343 . … S. v. Long, 76 N. C., 254 ; Lumber Co. v. Hutton, 159 N. C., 445 .

Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

175 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1918

Justice Walker in Norris v. Telegraph Co., 114 N. C., 94 , where the authorities are cited. … See, also, Askew v. Tel. Co., 174 N. C., 261 , and cases cited; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S., 542 ; James v. Tel. Co., 162 U. S., 650 .

Smith v. Kilburn

281 N.C. 155 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1972

187 S.E.2d 586 (1972) 281 N.C. 155 Pauline Parrish SMITH et al. v. Jimmy Dale KILBURN. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 4, 1972. Herbert B. Hulse, Sasser, Duke & Brown, for plaintiff.

Russell Ex Rel. Russell v. Cutshall

223 N.C. 353 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1943

R., 125; Morris v. Fruit Co., 124 S. E., 807 . See, also, 5 Blashfield CyC. Auto. L. & P., 152. In tbe Cotton case, supra, tbe plaintiff, as here, was invited to ride on tbe running board of tbe vehicle. … Fry v. Utilities Co., 183 N. C., 281 , 111 S. E., 354 ; Hayes v. Creamery, 195 N. C., 113 , 141 S. E., 340 ; Cole v.

Taylor v. . Hayes

172 N.C. 663 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1916

BRowN, J. This action, in the nature of a creditors’ bill, is brought by the.creditors of A. E. Hayes to subject certain lots of land in the town of Banner Elk to the payment of certain debts of said Hayes. … Thompson v. R. R., 147 N. C., 412 ; Lee v. Baird, 146 N. C., 362 . However, in our discretion, we have looked into those assignments and are of opinion that they are without merit and must be overruled.

Pritchard v. . Commissioners

159 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1912

II, sec. 14; Glenn v. Wray, 126 N. C., 730 ; Commissioners v. Stafford, 138 N. C., 453 ; Bank v. Lacy, 151 N. C., 4 ; Russell v. Troy, 159 N. C., 366 . … Board of Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. C., 388 . The Court has repeatedly held that the public roads are a necessary expense. Board of Trustees v. Webb, supra, and numerous cases there cited.