Case law

Loftin v. . Kornegay

225 N.C. 490 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1945

Gaylord v. Gaylord, supra; Campbell v. Sigmon, 170 N. C., 348 , 87 S. E., 116 ; Chilton v. Smith, 180 N. C., 472 , 150 S. E., 1 ; Perry v. Surety Co., 190 N. C., 284 , 129 S. E., 721 ; Waddell v. Aycock, 195 N. … E., 10 ; Penland v. Wells, 201 N. C., 173 , 159 S. E., 423 ; Carlisle v. Carlisle, ante, 462. Brown, J., in speaking for the Court, in Ricks v. Wilson, 154 N. C., 282 , 70 S.

Laughinghouse v. Great National Insurance

200 N.C. 434 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 11, 1931

Brown v. Commercial Mut. Ins. … Co. v. Assurance Co., 110 N. C., 176 ; Clegg v. R. R., 135 N. C., 148, 154 ; Modlin v. Ins. Co., 151 N. C., 35 ; Shuford v. Ins. Co., 167 N. C., 547 .

State v. Exum

343 N.C. 291 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1996

Thomas Brown, defense expert in the area of forensic psychiatry and substance abuse. … Brown. An in-chambers conference is a “critical stage” of a defendant’s capital trial at which he has a constitutional right to be present. See State v. Buchanan, 330 N.C. 202, 221 , 410 S.E.2d 832, 843 (1991).

Town of Hillsborough v. Smith

277 N.C. 727 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1971

178 S.E.2d 831 (1971) 277 N.C. 727 TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH v. Clarence Dupree SMITH et al. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 2, 1971. Graham & Cheshire, for plaintiff. Alonzo Brown Coleman, Jr., for defendants.

Deal v. . Wilson

178 N.C. 600 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1919

Prentice , 145 N.Y. 162 ; King v. Brown , 2 Hill (N. Y.) 485, at 487; Lockwood v. Barnes , 3 Hill (N. Y.) 128. The same was decided in Williams v. … Dulin , 59 N.C. 196 ; Thomas v. Skyles , 54 N.C. 302 ; Love v. Neilson, ib. , 339; Barnes v. Brown , 71 N.C. 507 ; Kelly v. Johnson , 135 N.C. 647 .

State v. Forrest

321 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1987

State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40 , 337 S.E. 2d 808 (1985); State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95 , 261 S.E. 2d 114 . … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40 , 337 S.E. 2d 808 ; State v. Myers, 299 N.C. 671 , 263 S.E. 2d 768 (1980).

State v. Stallings

230 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1949

Furthermore, G.S. 160-52 gives to the governing boards of municipalities the general power to enact ordinances. … Motley v. State Board of Barber Examiners, 228 N.C. 337 , 45 S.E. 2d 550 , 175 A.L.R. 253 ; Brumley v. Baxter, 225 N.C. 691 , 36 S.E. 2d 281 , 162 A.L.R. 930 ; Chimney Rock Co. v.

Roberts & Johnson Lumber Co. v. Horton

232 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1950

It is clear that under tbe decisions in Rose v. Davis, 188 N.C. 355 , 124 S.E. 576 , and Payne v. … Dixon v. Ipock, 212 N.C. 363 , 193 S.E. 392 ; Brown v. Hotel Corp., 202 N.C. 82 , 161 S.E. 735 .

Batchelor v. Mitchell

238 N.C. 351 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1953

Miller, 200 N.C. 458 , 157 S.E. 604 ; Tire Co. v. Lester, 190 N.C. 411 , 130 S.E. 45 . See also Myatt v. Myatt, 149 N.C. 137 , 62 S.E. 887 ; Bellamy v. Andrews, 151 N.C. 256 , 65 S.E. 963 ; Brown v. … Brown, 171 N.C. 649 , 88 S.E. 870 ; McNeill v. McNeill, supra ( 223 N.C. 178 , 25 S.E. 2d 615 ).

Daniel v. . McRae

9 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1823

Brown v. Maffey , 15 East, 216, may on first view seem to be analogous. But I think it essentially differs. … I admit that Brown v. Mott , 7 Johns., 361 , is an authority in point against the complainant.

High v. Ridgeway's Opticians

258 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1963

The -appellant relies strongly on the decision in the case of State ex rel The Oregon State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. … Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E. 2d 209 , Kovacs v. Brewer, 245 N.C. 630 , 97 S.E. 2d 96 ; Travis v. Johnston, 244 N.C. 713 , 95 S.E. 2d 94 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 ; Wilson v.

Bond v. Beverly

152 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1910

McConnell v. McConnell, 64 N. C., 342 ; Taylor v. Smith, 121 N. C., 76 ; Britton v. Ruffin, 122 N. C., 113 ; Smith v. Allen, 112 N. C., 223 ; Mfg. Co. v. Brooks, 106 N. C., 107 ; McFarland v. Cornwell, 151 N. … In Brown v. Brown, 106 N.

Shute v. . Monroe

187 N.C. 676 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1924

Shute and others filed allegations and objections on 2 April, 1923, before the board of aldermen to the confirmation by the board of the assessment roll. … Long v. Rockingham, ante , 204.

State v. Prevette

317 N.C. 148 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1986

State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 58 , 337 S.E. 2d 808, 822 (1985). … Brown, 315 N.C. 40 , 337 S.E. 2d 808 . Premeditation means that the act was thought out beforehand for some length of time, however short. State v. Myers, 299 N.C. 671 , 263 S.E. 2d 768 (1980).

Sykes v. Belk

278 N.C. 106 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1971

City of Washington, Washington County, supra; Harrison v. Board of County Commissioners, supra; Palmer v. City of Liberal, 334 Mo. 266 , 64 S.W. 2d 265 ; Bowling v. City of Bluefield, 104 W. … Nickel v. School Board of Axtell, 157 Neb. 813 , 61 N.W. 2d 556 ; Talbott v. City of Lyons, 171 Neb. 186 , 105 N.W. 2d 918 . See also 1 A.L.R. 2d 350 ; Gordon v.

Cedar Works v. . Shepard

181 N.C. 13 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 23, 1921

King v. Cooper, 128 N. C., 347 ; Matthews v. Fry, 141 N. C., 582 ; Warren v. Williford, 148 N. C., 474 ; Rexford v. Phillips, 159 N. C., 213 . … A full and clear discussion of the effect and validity of deeds executed by the State Board of Education will be found in Weston’s case as reported on the first appeal, in Weston v. Lumber Co., 162 N. C., 165 .

Walker v. Town of Elkin

254 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1961

Eakley v. Raleigh, 252 N.C. 683 , 114 S.E. 2d 777 ; Insurance Co. v. Shafer, 250 N.C. 45 , 108 S.E. 2d 49 . … . *90 Eggebeen, v. Sonnenburg, 138 A.L.R. 495 ; Keller v. City of Council Bluffs, Iowa, 51 A.L.R. 2d 251 ; 58 Am. Jur. 1033 ; 101 C.J.S. 845.

Vanderbilt Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Bowen

237 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1953

Noland Co., Inc., v. Jones, 211 N.C. 462 , 190 S.E. 720 ; Brown v. Benton, 209 N.C. 285 , 183 S.E. 292 ; Beck v. Halliwell, 202 N.C. 846 , 163 S.E. 747 ; Tarkington v. Griffield, 188 N.C. 140 , 124 S.E. 129 ; Taylor v. … Lee, 187 N.C. 393 , 121 S.E. 659 ; Ford v. Moore, 175 N.C. 260 , 95 S.E. 485 ; Whitehurst v. Padgett, 157 N.C. 424 , 73 S.E. 240 ; Peele v. Powell, 156 N.C. 553 , 73 S.E. 234 ; Sheppard v.

Thomas v. Trustees of Catawba College

242 N.C. 504 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1955

of Trustees of the College, with reports to the meeting; (3) by-laws of the Board of Trustees in force during two designated years; and (4) faculty handbook for the year 1948. … The order appealed from will be vacated and set aside on authority of the decisions in Dunlap v. Guaranty & Accident Co., 202 N.C. 651 , 163 S.E. 750 , and Patterson v. R.R., 219 N.C. 23 , 12 S.E. 2d 652 .

Harvy v. . Pike

4 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1817

Morse v. Slue , Ventris, 190, 238. But I am not prepared to say that the master would not be liable, even in an action founded on tort, for damage done to the goods while the pilot was on board. … The opinion of the Court in Snell v. Rich seems to be founded on the circumstance that the master was not on board when the accident happened. In Berry v.