Case law

Starling v. . Newsom

180 N.C. 440 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1920

Brown, J. It appears that on 9 Eebruary, 1917, John A. … Leathers v. Gray, 101 N. C., 162 ; Starnes v. Hill, 112 N. C., 1 . The fact that the same language appears in the introductory clause ■can certainly make no difference. The learned counsel for the defendant .

Hardison v. National Handle Co.

194 N.C. 351 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1927

The latest expression on the subject is to be found in Spruill v. Mfg. Co., 180 N. … This is not at variance with the rule first stated in Lewis v. Keeling, 46 N.

Vanderbilt Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Bowen

237 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1953

Noland Co., Inc., v. Jones, 211 N.C. 462 , 190 S.E. 720 ; Brown v. Benton, 209 N.C. 285 , 183 S.E. 292 ; Beck v. Halliwell, 202 N.C. 846 , 163 S.E. 747 ; Tarkington v. Griffield, 188 N.C. 140 , 124 S.E. 129 ; Taylor v. … Lee, 187 N.C. 393 , 121 S.E. 659 ; Ford v. Moore, 175 N.C. 260 , 95 S.E. 485 ; Whitehurst v. Padgett, 157 N.C. 424 , 73 S.E. 240 ; Peele v. Powell, 156 N.C. 553 , 73 S.E. 234 ; Sheppard v.

Intendant and Commissioners v. . Sorrell

46 N.C. 49 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1853

Rex v. Broke, Cowp. 26.. … By the 4th Section of that act, it is provided, “ That the Intendant of Police shall have- a seat in the Board of Commissioners, and when present, shall preside therein; in Ms absence, the Board shall appoint a chairman pro

State v. Williams

265 N.C. 446 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1965

S. v. Stewart, 255 N.C. 571 , 122 S.E. 2d 355 ; S. v. Bell, 228 N.C. 659 , 46 S.E. 2d 834 ; S. v. Burke, 73 N.C. 83 . … S. v. Brown, 113 N.C. 645 , 18 S.E. 51 ; S. v. Stewart, supra; S. v. Rogers, 246 N.C. 611 , 99 S.E. 2d 803 . In the case of S. v.

State v. . Spruill

225 N.C. 356 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1945

S.), 71; Curles v. Scales, 200 N. C., 612 , 158 S. E., 89 ; see also S. v. Bryson, 200 N. C., 50 , 156 S. E., 143 ; S. v. Marshall, 208 N. C., 127 , 179 S. E., 427 ; S. v. Reynolds, 212 N. C., 37 , 192 S. … E., 873 ; S. v. Robinson, 213 N. C., 273 , 195 S. E., 824 ; S. v. Bryant, 213 N. C., 752 , 197 S. E., 530 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N. C., 114 , 198 S. E., 630 ; Self Help Corp. v. Brinkley, 215 N. C., 615 , 2 S.

Jenkins Hardware Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.

205 N.C. 185 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1933

Manifestly, if a contractor, as a matter of necessity, was compelled to furnish board and lodging for his workmen as a part of their compensation, deducting the price of such board and lodging from wages paid, 'then the principle … announced in Brogan v.

Smith v. County of Mecklenburg

280 N.C. 497 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

If favored by the majority, provision was made for the establishment of a City Board of Alcoholic Control. … The act provided further “that the City Board shall have all the powers and duties imposed by G.S. 18-45 on County Boards; shall be subject to the same powers and authority of the State Board as are County Boards under G.S

Hines v. City of Rocky Mount

162 N.C. 409 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1913

of the public health, and may create and appoint a board of health to exercise and carry out such powers under the supervision and control of the first mentioned board. … Little v. Lenoir, 151 N. C., 415 ; Nevins v. Peoria, 41 Ill., 502 ; Winchell v. Waukesha, 110 Wis., 101 ; Eaton v. R. R., 51 N. II., 504; Bohan v. Port Jervis Co., 122 N. Y., 18 ; Mining Co. v.

State v. . Switzer

187 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 1924

Brown’s office. Mr. Brown was justice of the peace. Mr. King started to draw up a warrant and Mr. Hedgecoek says, 'I will draw that on the typewriter if you will dictate it.’ He drew the warrant and Mr. … See, also, S. v. Jones, 83 N. C., 605 ; S. v. Dowell, 106 N. C., 722 .

State v. . Allen

208 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935

S. v. Williams, ante, 352; S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747 , 175 S. E. 116 . … S. v. Williams, supra; S. v. Johnson, 205 N. C., 610 , 172 S. E., 219 .

State v. Blake

319 N.C. 599 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1987

Defendant was wearing “a black tee-shirt, blue jeans, and a pair of brown boots. . . .” Other evidence showed defendant to be a white male with shoulder-length dark blond, or light brown, hair. … State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 731 , 268 S.E. 2d 201 (1980); State v. Jenkins, 300 N.C. 578 , 268 S.E. 2d 458 (1980).

Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.

238 N.C. 124 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1953

See also Douglas v. Buchanan, 211 N.C. 664 , 191 S.E. 736 . Therefore under our usual procedure the appeal will be dismissed as premature. Abbitt v. Gregory, 196 N.C. 9 , 144 S.E. 297 . See also Brown v. … See Grandy v.

Wood v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

365 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2011

WOOD, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. … TEACHERS' AND STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; Board Of Trustees Of the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System, a body politic and corporate; Janet Cowell, Treasurer of the State of North Carolina

Daniel v. . McRae

9 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1823

Brown v. Maffey , 15 East, 216, may on first view seem to be analogous. But I think it essentially differs. … I admit that Brown v. Mott , 7 Johns., 361 , is an authority in point against the complainant.

Tindal v. Mills

265 N.C. 716 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1965

See Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485 , 141 S.E. 2d 875 . However, we have carefully examined and considered each of them. … See also Tapp v. Dibrell, 134 N.C. 546 , 47 S.E. 51 . Plaintiff’s evidence is sufficient to withstand nonsuit. The evidence of plaintiff and defendant is in sharp conflict.

Thompson v. Exum.

131 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1902

Moore v. Eason, 33 N. C., 568 ; Brown v. Atkinson, 91 N. C., 389 . But this rule has never been extended, so far as we know, to apply to the business rules or customs of individuals. No Error.

Lee v. Town of Waynesville

184 N.C. 565 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1922

Newton v. School Committee, 158 N. C., 186 -188, citing Jeffress v. Greenville, 154 N. C., 490 ; Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, 149 N. C., 128 ; Ward v. Comrs., 146 N. C., 534 ; Small v. Edenton, 146 N. C., 527 ; Tale v. … Smith v. Washington, 20 How., 136 ; Brush v. City of Carbondale, 78 Ill., 74 ; Pontiac v.

Gwathmey v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF ENVIR.

342 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1995

In Tatum v. … Rohrer v.

Warren v. . Bourne

196 N.C. 803 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1928

Cobb v. Clegg, 137 N. C., 153 ; Herwitz v. Sand Co., 189 N. C., 1 ; Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N. C., 32 ; Brown v. Aydlett, 193 N. C., 832 ; R. R. v. Rapid Transit Co., 195 N. C., 305 . Affirmed.