Case law

State v. Martin

315 N.C. 667 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1986

In State v. … V.

Crescent Hat Co. v. Chizik

223 N.C. 371 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1943

Bonnett-Brown Corp. v. Coble, 195 N. C., 491 , 142 S. E., 772 . See also Mottu v. Davis, 151 N. C., 237 , 65 S. E., 969 ; S. c., 153 N. C., 160 , 69 S. E., 63 ; Williamson v. Jerome, 169 N. C., 215 , 85 S. E., 300 . … Roberts v. Pratt, 158 N. C., 50 , 73 S. E., 129 .

Moss v. Best Knitting Mills

190 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 1925

Whether it is an acceptance is generally a question of fact (Gray v. James, 128 Mass., 110 ; Fuller v. Brown, 67 N. H., 188; Colby v. Franklin, 15 Wis., 311 ), and therefore probable by parol evidence. … Brown, 25 Ga., 24 ; Whitcomb v. Roll, 81 N. E., 106 ; Ind. School Dist. v. Swearngin, 119 Iowa, 702 ; Peacock v. Gleesen, 117 Iowa, 291 (only reasonable diligence in drilling well); Hartford Co. v. Tobacco W. Co.

Rosenstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Bank

304 N.C. 541 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981

ROSENSTEIN v. MECHANICS & FARMERS BANK. Wilma C. ROSENSTEIN v. MECHANICS & FARMERS BANK. No. 45. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 1, 1981. *506 Nye, Mitchell, Jarris & Bugg by Charles B. … Knutton v. Cofield, 273 N.C. 355, 363 , 160 S.E.2d 29, 36 (1968).

Worley v. CHAMPION MOTOR COMPANY

246 N.C. 677 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1957

Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 542 , 61 S.E. 2d 613 . (2) Evidence to support the allegation. Childress v. Motor Lines, 235 N.C. 522 , 70 S.E. 2d 558 . (3) A proper issue. Irvin v. R. R., 164 N.C. 5 , 80 S.E. 78 . … Cook v. Hobbs, 237 N.C. 490 , 75 S.E. 2d 322 . “The jury should see the issues, stripped of all redundant and confusing matters, and in as clear a light as practicable.” Fish Co. v.

Chambers v. Edney

247 N.C. 165 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1957

The principle is thus declared in Lagler v. Roch. … And the board, which broke under his weight, looked to him “like a sound board. There was nothing discoverable by looking at it.”

Town of Fremont v. Baker

236 N.C. 253 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1952

He mphill v. Board of Aldermen, 212 N.C. 185 , 193 S.E. 153 ; Cahoon v. Roughton, 215 N.C. 116 , 1 S.E. 2d 362 ; Thompson v. Umberger, 221 N.C. 178 , 19 S.E. 2d 484 ; Chesson v. … Branch v. Board of Educes lion, supra.

Cooper v. Denlinger

676 S.E.2d 897 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 2009

676 S.E.2d 897 (2009) COPPER, et al. v. DENLINGER, et al. No. 526A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 27, 2009. Ann L. Majestic, Christine Scheef, Raleigh, for School Board, et al. Frances P. … Schafer, for NC School Boards Asso. Jack Holtzman, Raleigh, for NC Justice Center, et al. Katherine Lewis Parker, Ocracoke, for ACLU of NC Legal Foundation. Lewis Pitts, for Advocates-Children's Legal Aid.

State v. Jordan

333 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1993

A few weeks before the killing, defendant showed Michael Lorenzo Brown a pistol and asked Brown where he could get some bullets. Brown told defendant that he could get bullets at Rose’s or K Mart. … State v. Faison, 330 N.C. 347 , 411 S.E.2d 143 (1991). In State v.

Estate of Williams v. PASQUOTANK COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT

365 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 2011

718 S.E.2d 386 (2011) ESTATE OF Erik Dominic WILLIAMS v. PASQUOTANK COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT, et al. No. 231PA11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 9, 2011. Robert Thomas Numbers, II, Henry W. … School Boards Association. Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney, for Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County. Michael C. Frue, Asheville, for Buncombe County. Leon M. Killian, III, Raleigh, for Haywood County.

Chandler v. Mashburn

233 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1951

Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 . Hence, averments narrating evidence which defendant contends sustains his *279 denial of the controverted facts are irrelevant as pleading, and have no place in the answer. … Revis v. Asheville, 207 N.C. 237 , 176 S.E. 738 .

Rodman v. . Norman

221 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1942

In Lumber Co. v. Herrington, 183 N. C., 85 , 110 S. … In Hines v. Williams, 198 N. C., 420 , 152 S.

State Ex Rel. Lee v. Martin

186 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1923

S. v. Bradley, 10 Peters, 343 . … S. v. Long, 76 N. C., 254 ; Lumber Co. v. Hutton, 159 N. C., 445 .

C. J. Shoaf & Co. v. Frost

116 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

Any exception to the action of this second board can only be to the correctness of the valuation added or subtracted (as the case may be) taking the jury valuation of the property, first allotted, as the basis. … extraordinary reasons, as added improvements or great rise in values, or on the other hand the destruction of buildings or great depreciation in values, it may be that relief can be had in the manner pointed out in Vanstory v.

R. R. v. . Cherokee County

218 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1940

Article V , sec. 6 , of North Carolina Constitution. … Upon authority of Power Co. v. Clay County, supra , the judgment below is Affirmed.

Sandlin v. . Kearney

154 N.C. 596 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1911

Co. v. Gray , 124 N.C. 322 . In Watkins v. … Brown v. Brown , 103 Ind. 23 .

Silver Valley Mining Co. v. North Carolina Smelting Co.

119 N.C. 417 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Bank v. Adrian, 116 N. C., 537 ; Peeler v. Peeler, 109 N. C., 628 ; Berry v. Hall, 105 N. C., 154 ; Helms v. Green, Ibid., 251; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 ; Woodruff v. Bowles, 104 N. C., 197 .

Kerr Grain & Hay Co. v. Marion Cash Feed Co.

179 N.C. 654 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1920

Millhiser v. Balsley, 106 N. C., 433 . Tbe case of Barnhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 , has no application, as it relates to the service of summons on an officer, or agent, under laws of 1889, cb. 108. … Devries v. Summit, 86 N. C., 126 . 2.

Ferguson v. Riddle

233 N.C. 54 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1950

Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578 ; Eller v. Wall, 229 N.C. 359 , 49 S.E. 2d 758 ; Penland v. Gowan, 229 N.C. 449 , 50 S.E. 2d 182 ; S. v. Cochran, 230 N.C. 523 , 53 S.E. 2d 663 . … Eller v. Wall, supra; Penland v. Gowan, supra.

In Re Estate of Mizzelle

213 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1938

In Freeman v. Cook, 41 N. C., 373 (378), Nash, J., said: “The chancellor is the only safe and secure counsellor to trustees.” The same principle applies to executors and administrators. Bank v. Alexander, 188 N. … In Ellis v. Harrison, 140 N.