Case law

O'Neal v. South & Western Railroad

152 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1910

BrowN, J. … Tbe law governing tbe case is so fully stated in tbe opinion of this Court by tbe Chief Justice in Nicholson v. R. R., 138 N. C., 516 , that it is unnecessary to further discuss tbe subject. Affirmed.

State v. Call

121 N.C. 643 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

S., 36 ; Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S., 22 ; Barbier v. Connelly, 113 U. S., 27 ; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S., 68 ; Railroad v. Mackey, 127 U. S., 205 ; Walston v. Nevin, 128 U. S., 578 ; Bell v. Penn., 134 U. … State v. Dent, supra; Ex Parte Spinney, 10 Nevada, 328; West v. Clutter, 37 Ohio, 347; People v. Phippin , 70 Michigan, 25; Hewitt v. Charis, 16 Pick. (Mass.) 356; State v. Medical Board, 32 Minn., 324 ; State v.

Mathis v. . Bryson

49 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1857

Rep. 117 ; Smith v. Brown, 3 Hawks’ Rep. 580 ; Stark, on Ev. 2 v. pt. 1 in Note ; State Bank v. Littlejohn, 1 Dev. and Bat. 565. Piok. CuRiAM, Judgment reversed, and a venire do novo awarded.

Willis v. . Melvin

53 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1860

He would seem, therefore, to be no more than an agent or servant of the sheriff; Hampton v. Brown, 13 Ire. 18.

Bruton v. Bland

260 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1963

May v. Loomis, 140 N.C. 350 , 52 S.E. 728 ; Hutchins v. Davis, 230 N.C. 67 , 52 S.E. 2d 210 ; Parker v. White, 235 N.C. 680 , 71 S.E. 2d 122 . … Woodley v. Combs, 210 N.C. 482 , 187 S.E. 762 ; Board of Education v. Board of Education, 259 N.C. 280 , 130 S.E. 2d 408 . In Knight v.

State v. Bullock

316 N.C. 180 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1986

Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 45 L.Ed. 2d 562 (1975); State v. Thacker, 301 N.C. 348 , 271 S.E. 2d 252 (1980). … See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 45 L.Ed. 2d 562 .

State Ex Rel. Harris v. Harrison

78 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1878

Jones v. Brown, 68 N. C. 554 , was also cited by the defendants. … Brumble v. Brown, 71 N. C. 513 , is to the same effect against a collecting officer. Covington v. Leak, 65 N. C. 594 , and the. same case in 67 N.

Hammett v. Southern Railway Co.

157 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1911

BROWN, J. … We think the case comes within the principles laid down in Heavener v. R. R., 141 N. C., 245 ; Purnell v. R. R., 122 N. C., 832 ; Stanley v. R. R., 120 N. C., 514 . The judgment of nonsuit is set aside. New trial.

Skinner v. Gaither Corp.

234 N.C. 385 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1951

Kelly v. Trimont Lodge, 154 N.C. 97 , 69 S.E. 764 ; Williams v. Manufacturing Co., 153 N.C. 7 , 68 S.E. 902 ; Nelson v. R. R., 157 N.C. 194 , 72 S.E. 998 ; Hargett v. DeLisle, 229 N.C. 384 , 49 S.E. 2d 739 ; Brown v. … Manufacturing Co., supra; Tarpley v.

Den on Demise of Pendleton v. Pendleton

6 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1811

The ease before the Court is very much like the case of Pells v. Brown, (Cro. … The principle of that decision has been approved in the cases of Patton v. Bradly, (3 Term 145,) and Roe v. Jeffrey, (7 Term 589,) In the case of Hughes v. Sayer, (1 P.

Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers

201 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1931

Nesbitt v. Donoho, 198 N. C., 147 , 150 S. E., 875 ; Staley v. Lowe, 197 N. C., 243 , 148 S. E., 240 ; Stallings v. Ellis, 136 N. C., 69 , 48 S. E., 548 . … Nesbitt v. Donoho, supra; Dunn v. Currie, 141 N. C., 123 , 53 S. E., 533 ; Brown v. Williams, 196 N. C., 247 , 145 S. E., 233 ; Henderson v. McLain, 146 N. C., 329 , 59 S. E., 873 ; Winkler v. Killian, 141 N.

Atkinson v. City of Asheville

205 N.C. 36 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1933

This evidence, it would seem, is sufficient to carry the case to the jury under the principles announced in Brown v. R. R., 188 N. C., 52 , 123 S. E., 633 , S. v. Williams, 153 N. C., 595 , 68 S. … E., 900 , and differentiates it from Harrison v. New Bern, 193 N. C., 555, 137 S. E., 582 , cited and relied upon by defendants. ¥e refrain from a discussion of the evidence, as its credibility is for the jury. Reversed.

State v. . Haynie

169 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1915

R. v. Davis, 19 N. C., 451 ; Johnston v. Rankin, 70 N. C., 550 ; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 . And it cannot, under tbe guise of calling it a cartway, take away this protection from tbe owner. … Brown v. Bower Co., supra. This private way is not within the descriptive words of the Public-Local Laws of 1913, ch. 40, sec. 23.

White v. . Lane

153 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 14, 1910

But as the owners of land within the district are not incompetent to sit on the board of viewers to pass upon the classification and assessment of the several tracts in the first 'instance, it would not seem that the clerk … Eastman v. Comrs., 119 N. C., 505 ; Johnson v. Rankin, 70 N. C., 550 . Cases in which the clerk would be disqualified to act are cited in Land Co. v. Jennett, 128 N. C., 4 .

In Re Walker

282 N.C. 28 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1972

Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 169 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 (1966); Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 811 , 83 S.Ct. 814 (1963); Griffin v. … Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, supra; Williams v. Rhodes, supra. A showing of mere rationality is insufficient.

Cayton v. . Clark

212 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1937

Bowie v. Tucker, 197 N. C., 671 , 150 S. E., 200 ; Bank v. Duke, 187 N. C., 386 , 122 S. E., 1 ; Land Co. v. Wooten, 177 N. C., 248 , 98 S. E., 706 ; School v. Peirce, 163 N. C., 424 , 79 S. E., 687 ; McLeod v. … — Brown, J., in Glisson v. Glisson, 153 N. C., 185 , 69 S. E., 55 .

Cable v. . Hardin

67 N.C. 472 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1872

Robeson v. Brown, 63 N. C., 554 . Now, was the consideration of the note of 1864, a loan of Confederate money, or a purchase of property ? … State v. Cordon, 8 Ire. 179, Story’s Prom. Notes, 404, 408; Cornwell v. Gould, 4 Pick. 144 ; Hare v. Alexander, 2 Metc. 157 ; Gabriel v. Draper, 80 E. C. L. R.

Yonge v. New York Life Insurance

199 N.C. 16 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1930

In Monger v. Lutterloh, 195 N. … Buie v. Brown, 104 N. C., 335 ; Martin v. Goode, 111 N. C., 288 ; Allen v. R. R., 120 N. C., 548 ; Barbee v. Davis, 187 N. C., 78 ; Power Co. v. Elizabeth City, 188 N. C., 278 .

City of Sanford v. SOUTHERN OIL COMPANY

244 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1956

In re Stokley, 240 N.C. 658 , 83 S.E. 2d 703 ; Bell v. Nivens, 225 N.C. 35, 33 S.E. 2d 66 ; S. v. Moore, 210 N.C. 686 , 188 S.E. 421 ; Taylor v. Johnson, 171 N.C. 84 , 87 S.E. 981 ; Todd v. … Baker v. Varser, 240 N.C. 260 , 82 S.E. 2d 357 ; Russ v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128 , 59 S.E. 2d 64 ; Belk’s Department Store, Inc., v. Guilford County, 222 N.C. 441 , 23 S.E. 2d 897 .

Roberts v. Pratt

152 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1910

Moody v. Johnston, 112 N. C., 798 -801; Brown v. Pratt, 56 N. C., 202 . … See, also, McIntosh v. Commissioners, 13 Kan., 171 ; Thompson v. Council, 31 Oregon, 231; Browning v. Roane, 9 Ark., 354; Bounse v. Barker, 1 Greene, 263 .