Case law

Corey v. Hardison

236 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1952

Rodwell v. Harrison, 132 N.C. 45 , 43 S.E. 540 ; S. v. Osborne, 14 Ariz. 185 , 125 P. 884 ; Simpson v. Teftler, 176 Ark. 1093 , 5 S.W. 2d 350 ; Merwin v. Fussell, 93 Ark. 336 , 124 S.W. 1021 ; Kimberlin v. … R. 208 ; Gossard v. Vaught, 10 Kan. 162 ; Doores v. Varnon, 94 Ky. 507 , 22 S.W. 852 ; State v. Webb, 49 Mo. App. 407 ; State ex rel. White v. Ruark, 24 Mo. App. 325 ; State ex *153 rel. Sibbald v. Brickell, 59 N.

State v. Hawkins

214 N.C. 326 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1938

. - An ironing board was near by and a shirt was in her hand. An empty shell recently fired and a shell loaded with No. 6 shot were found by the coroner in the hallway of the house. The defendant was not then at home. … E., 14 , Brown, J., said: “We might hesitate to admit evidence of threats made two years before tbe homicide, if they stood alone, although threats made twelve months prior were admitted in S. v. Howard, 82 N.

Lang v. . Development Co.

169 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1915

S. v. Haynie, ante , 277; Commissioners v. Bonner , 153 N.C. pp. 66-71 ; Brown v. Power Co. , 140 N.C. p. 333 ; S. v. Lyle , 100 N.C. p. 497 . … In his well prepared and thoughtful argument before us we were referred, by counsel for the appellee to the case, among others, of Brown v.

Luther v. . Luther

157 N.C. 499 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1911

v. … Roseman v. Roseman, 127 N. C., 498.

State v. Freeman

307 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1983

Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 604 , 45 L.Ed. 2d 416, 427 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2262 (1975). “Indeed, if the Fifth Amendment has been violated, the Fourth Amendment issue would not have to be reached.” Dunaway v. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603 , *365 45 L.Ed. 2d 416, 427 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 (1975).

Hill v. . Bell

61 N.C. 122 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1867

The first objection is fully answered by the two cases of Harrison v. Burgess, 1 Hawks, 384 , and Brown v. Beaver, 3 Jon., 516. … The case of Little v.

Bennett v. North Carolina Railroad

159 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1911

Brown, J. This action was commenced on 4 July, 1910, by the issuing of a summons in the individual name of Mary E. Bennett, plaintiff, v. North Carolina Railroad Company, a corporation, defendant. … Best v. Kinston, 106 N. C., 205 ; Merrill v. Merrill, 92 N. C., 657 ; Clendenin v. Turner, 96 N. C., 416 .

Archer v. McClure

166 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

In a case of this sort, Chief Justice Parker, in Brown v. … The Court there said, by Justice Brown: “In Henkle v.

MATTER OF McCARROLL

327 S.E.2d 880 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1985

Love v. Moore, 305 N.C. 575, 578 , 291 S.E.2d 141, 144 (1982); Equitable Leasing Corp. v. Myers, 46 N.C.App. 162 , 265 S.E.2d 240 (1980). … The trial court denied the applicant's motion that his appeal from the Board's order be heard by a jury and that Board *882 Rule .1404 be declared unconstitutional.

Long v. Bank of Yanceyville

81 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

In addition to what we have said in the opinion in the other appeal, we are content to refer to Glenn v. Bank , 80 N.C. 97 . … Cited: Wilson v. Linebarger , 82 N.C. 414 ; Long v. Bank , 90 N.C. 406 ; Montague v. Brown , 104 N.C. 165 ; Hancock v. Wooten , 107 N.C. 20 ; Smith v. Summerfield , 108 N.C. 286 . (51)

Wood v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

365 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2011

WOOD, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. … TEACHERS' AND STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; Board Of Trustees Of the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System, a body politic and corporate; Janet Cowell, Treasurer of the State of North Carolina

Forester v. Town of North Wilkesboro

206 N.C. 347 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1934

See S. v. Kelly, 186 N. C., 365 (371-2). … “In Hill v. Skinner, 169 N.

State v. Holland

318 N.C. 602 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1986

State v. … State v. Gonzalez, 311 N.C. 80 , 316 S.E. 2d 229 (1984); State v.

Faulkenbury v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM

483 S.E.2d 422 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1997

The defendants argue that Griffin v. Board of Comm'rs, 84 N.C.App. 443 , 352 S.E.2d 882 (1987), is inconsistent with Simpson and the Court of Appeals' opinion in this case. We agree. … In Crow v.

Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Reid

187 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1924

Board etc. v. Stanley, 105 U. S., 405 ; 26 Law Ed., 1044, 1050. An examination will show that our own decisions are in accord with this principle. Johnson v. Winslow, 63 N. C., 552 ; S. v. Joyner, 81 N. C., 534 ; S. v. … The register of deeds is constituted clerk ex oficio of the board of commissioners, and is required to record all the proceedings of the board in a book to be provided for this purpose. C. S., 1309, 1310.

State v. . Todd

224 N.C. 776 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1944

S. v. Edwards, 205 N. C., 661 , 172 S. E., 399 ; S. v. Casey, supra. … “A judicial inquiry is one which investigates, declares and carries out existing law” — Brown, J., in Hudson v. McArthur, 152 N. C., 445 (loe. cit. 454), 67 S. E., 995 .

Yonge v. New York Life Insurance

199 N.C. 16 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1930

In Monger v. Lutterloh, 195 N. … Buie v. Brown, 104 N. C., 335 ; Martin v. Goode, 111 N. C., 288 ; Allen v. R. R., 120 N. C., 548 ; Barbee v. Davis, 187 N. C., 78 ; Power Co. v. Elizabeth City, 188 N. C., 278 .

State v. Jones

280 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 1972

The issue turned largely on whether the jury would give credence to the testimony of Strickland, Brown and Lee. … Brown testified that Sterling told him that “there are six of us involved” and that “the stamps were stolen out of a safe in Lumberton.”

Vaden v. North Carolina Railroad

150 N.C. 700 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1909

Brown, J. The defendant in apt .time entered a motion to nonsuit, wbicb the court overruled, and defendant excepted. … Neg. (3d Ed.), sec. 466; Wilson v. Railroad, 142 N. C., 333 ; Allen v. Railroad, 145 N. C., 214 ; Bradley v. Railroad, 126 N. C., 742 . In the voluminous notes to Railroad v. Smith, 18 L. R.

Washington County v. Norfolk Southern Land Co.

222 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1943

See Plott v. Construction Co., 198 N. C., 782 , 153 S. E., 396 . Moreover, it is pointed out in Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788 , 156 S. … S. v. Lumber Co., supra. Appeal dismissed.