Case law

Hilton v. . Harris

207 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1934

The board of aldermen of the city of Concord, North Carolina, do ordain: Section 1. … Ordained by the board of aldermen of the city of Concord, this 2 June, 1932.”

Gregg v. City of Wilmington

155 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1911

Quimby had been permitted by the city to pile boards upon a street in front of his house while making repairs on it. This was negligently done, and the city was compelled to pay damages to a person injured thereby. … Brown v. Louisburg , 126 N.C. 701 ; Raleigh v. R. R. , 129 N.C. 265 ; and those cases can not in any way be distinguished from the one now under consideration.

Tuttle v. Junior Building Corp.

228 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1948

E., 558 , and usually, a corporation may sell, transfer, and convey its corporate real estate only when authorized to do so by its board of directors. G. S. 55-26 (10). These statutory provisions (G. S. 55-48; G. … S. 55-26 (10)), are supplemented by a stipulation in defendant’s'bylaws as follows: “Full executive power shall be vested in the board of directors in the transaction of any and all business of the corporation of any and

Richardson v. Bank of America

659 S.E.2d 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008

659 S.E.2d 740 (2008) RICHARDSON v. BANK OF AMERICA. No. 240PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 6, 2008. John H. Culver, III, F.Amy Pritchard Williams, Charlotte, Walter E. … Christopher Browning, Jr., Solicitor General, Philip A. Lehman, M. Lynne Weaver, Assistant Attorney Generals, L. McNeil Chestnut, Special Deputy Attorney General and Counsel to the Commissioner of Banks, Gary E.

Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

171 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1916

BrowN, J. During the selection of tbe jury one Darden was challenged by plaintiff for cause. Upon examination he stated he was an employee of defendant, being a clerk in its legal department. … Blevins v. Cotton Mills, 150 N. C., 493 ; Featherstone v. Cotton Mills, 159 N. C., 429 ; Waters v. Lumber Co., 165 N. C., 388 ; Starr v. Oil Co., 165 N. C., 587 ; Norris v. Mills, 154 N. C., 474 .

Turner v. . McKee

137 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1904

In Staton v. … This has been cited with approval in Stanly v. Baird , 118 N.C. 83 ; Sanders v. Earp , 118 N.C. 279 ; S. v. Oswalt , 118 N.C. 1213 ; 32 L.R.A., 396 ; S. v. Deyton , 119 N.C. 882 ; Staton v.

First National Bank v. Tarboro Cotton Factory

179 N.C. 203 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1920

Brown, J. On 8 November, 1919, upon affidavit of the plaintiff, the clerk of Superior Court issued a warrant of attachment, attaching a certain sum of money, then in the hands of the sheriff, belonging to the defendant. … Hughes v. Person, 63 N. C., 548 ; Judd v. Mining Co., 120 N. C., 399 ; Wood v. Harrell, 74 N. C., 338 ; Peebles v. Foot, 83 N. C., 102 .

Roberts & Hoge, Inc. v. Moore

185 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1923

Brown v. Cogdell, 136 N. C., 33 ; Mfg. Co. v. Brower, 105 N. C., 440 ; Jones v. Statesville, 97 N. C., 86 .

Edwards v. . Moore

99 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

Weaver v. Jones, 82 N. C., 440; Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 . … Sumner v. Sessoms, 94 N. C., 371 ; Cates v. Pickett, 97 N. C., 21 , and the cases there cited. There is no error.

State v. . Casey

159 N.C. 472 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1912

Brown, J. … This question has been discussed and settled by this Court in S. v. Matthews, 142 N. C., 621 ; S. v. Quick, 150 N. C., 820 ; and S. v. Freeman, 122 N. C., 1012 . Upon a review of the entire record, we find No error.

Sanders v. . Thompson

114 N.C. 282 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

This the Clerk was entitled, to demand {Andrews v. Whisnant, 83 N. C., 446 ; Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127 ), except in criminal actions {State v. Nash, 109 N. C., 822 ). … As was said in Peebles v. Braswell, 107 N. C., 68 , “it would be a vain thing to send a certiorari clown for papers which arc not in the office and to supply which no steps have been taken.”

State v. Mayhand

298 N.C. 418 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1979

State v. Brown, 280 N.C. 588 , 187 S.E. 2d 85 (1972); Mintz v. R.R., 236 N.C. 109 , 72 S.E. 2d 38 (1952); State v. Phillips, 228 N.C. 595 , 46 S.E. 2d 720 (1948). … State v. Madden, 292 N.C. 114 , 232 S.E. 2d 656 (1977); Brown v. Loftis, 226 N.C. 762 , 40 S.E. 2d 421 (1946); Jones v. Jones, 80 N.C. 246 (1879).

State Ex Rel. Kilburn v. Patterson

98 N.C. 593 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

This case is substantially like that of Gatling v. Boone, decided at the present term, and must be governed by it. … Such allegations were not. necessary, because the decision of the Board was not conclusive, and the purpose of this action is not to have the Court below, as a court of errors, correct particular errors of the-Board, but

State v. . Tate

210 N.C. 613 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1936

We rode around together in an automobile until about 10 :30 o’clock, when Caswell Brown and Miss Hardy left us. … See State v. Miller, 189 N. C., 695 , 128 S. E., 1 .

Scott v. . Auman

209 N.C. 853 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1936

The deceased was living in said house and no board was being charged him for living there. … Tomlinson v. Norwood, 208 N. C., 716 ; Rowe v. Rowe-Coward Co., 208 N. C., 484 ; Byrd v. Lumber Co., 207 N. C., 253 . Judgment affirmed.

Peanut Co. v. . R. R.

155 N.C. 148 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1911

BROWN, J., concurring in result; WALKER, J., concurring in the opinion of MR. JUSTICE BROWN; ALLEN, J., concurring. After stating the case: In Harper v. … Lumber Co. v. R. R. , 151 N.C. 23 ; Sharpe v. R. R. , 130 N.C. 613 ; Rocky Mount Mills v. R. R. , 119 N.C. 693 .

Long v. Love

230 N.C. 535 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1949

In Winders v. … R., 222 N.C. 704 , 24 S.E. 2d 537 ; Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 .

Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists v. Miles

259 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1963

Reid v. Johnston, supra. … (N.S.) 703; Watson v. Jones, 13 Wall. 679 ; Puckett v. Jessee, 81 S.E. 2d 425 (Va. 1954); Stone v. Bogue, 181 S.W. 2d 187 (Mo. 1944); Krecker v. Shirey, 30 A. 440 (Pa. 1894).

In Re a Filing by the North Carolina Automobile Rate Administrative Office

278 N.C. 302 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1971

Soon after the decision in United States v. … In Allstate Insurance Company v.

Solomon v. . Bates

118 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

Townsend v. Williams, 117 N. C., 330 , and Caldwell v. Bates, and Tate v. Bates, at this Term. In the latter case the Court says: “The directors are conclusively presumed to know the condition of the bank. Hauser v. … C., 81 ; Morse, Banks, Sec. 137; Finn v. Brown, 142 U. S., 56 ; United Soc. v. Underwood, 9 Bush., 609, and other cases cited in Solomon v. Bates, at this Term.