Case law

Jacobs v. Safie Manufacturing Co.

229 N.C. 660 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1948

Creighton v. Snipes, 227 N. C. 90 , 40 S. E. (2) 612; Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N. C. 537 , 35 S. E. (2) 609; Fox v. Cramerton Mills, 225 N. C. 580 , 35 S. E. (2) 869; Brown v. Carolina Aluminum Co., 224 N. C. 766 , 32 S. … Whitted v. Palmer-Bee Co., 228 N. C. 447 , 46 S. E. (2) 109; Lineberry v. Mebane, 218 N. C. 737 , 12 S. E. (2) 252; Winslow v. Carolina Conference Asso., 211 N. C. 571 , 191 S. E. 403 ; Lilly v.

Everett v. . Reynolds

114 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

In Stancil v. … Cited: Harris v. Brown , 123 N.C. 419 , 424 ; Strickland v. Strickland , 129 N.C. 89 ; Ins. Co. v. Scott , 136 N.C. 159 ; Scott v. Life Association , 137 N.C. 520 ; Miller v. Curl , 162 N.C. 5 ; Estes v.

Pridgen v. . R. R. Service Co. v. . R. R.

203 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1932

Brown v. R. R. , 202 N.C. 256 ; Phifer v. Berry , 202 N.C. 388 . … The standards prescribed for determining whether the proposed newly discovered evidence will warrant a new trial are contained in Brown v. Sheets . 197 N.C. 268 , 148 S.E. 233 .

Womack v. . Thorne

205 N.C. 837 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1933

Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 25 ; Culp v. Ins. Co., 202 N. C., 87 ; Overton v. R. R., ibid., 848; Matthews v. Lumber Co., 198 N. C., 129 ; Wright v. Utility Co., ibid., 204; Ferris v. R. R., 194 N. C., 653 . Affirmed.

McDowell v. Western North Carolina Insane Asylum

101 N.C. 656 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

It was begun before the County Commissioners, who are invested with power and authority to hear applications-for such purposes, “ and if sufficient reason be shown the board (of County Commissioners) shall appoint and settle … The right to appeal at the same stage of the proceeding, as was done in this case, is incidentally recognized in Burden v. Harman, 7 Jones, 354 ; Pridgen v. Anders, Ibid., 257; and Andrews v. Beam, 97 N. C., 315 .

Mabry v. . Stafford

88 N.C. 602 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

Taylor v. Lucas, 4 Hawks, 215 ; Sorrey v. Bright, 1 Dev. & Bat. Eq., 113 ; Jones v. Perry, 3 Ired. Eq., 200; Lea v. Brown, 3 Jones’ Eq., 141; Graves v. Howard, Ibid, 302; Coley v. Ballance, 1 Winst. Eq., 89.

Bailey v. State

330 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1991

Brown, Joan W. Brown, Margaret M. Brown, John W. Buchan, Eunice W. Bullard, Dewey L. Butler, McCauley C. Byrum, Gertrude G. Cahoon, Joseph H. Calder, Catherine N. Cann, Dorothy T. Carmichael, Maurice O. Caton, Robert A. … See also Oil Corp. v. Clayton Comr. of Revenue, 267 N.C. at 20 , 147 S.E.2d at 526 ("The law does not contemplate that administrative boards shall pass upon constitutional questions.").

State v. Mosley

212 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1938

Motion of tbe State to remand tbe cause for correction of tbe record will be allowed in accordance with S. v. Brown, 203 N. C., 513 , 166 S. E., 396 . Remanded.

State v. Maultsby.

139 N.C. 583 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1905

C., 445 ; Board *585 of Education v. Henderson, Id., 695; School Directors v. Asheville, 137 N. C., 508 . … Board of Education v. Henderson, 126 N. C., 689 ; School Directors v. Asheville, 137 N. C., 508 .

Scottish Carolina Timber & Land Co. v. Brooks

109 N.C. 698 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Bullinger v. Marshall, 70 N. C., 520 ; McDonald v. Cannon, 82 N. C., 245 ; Wall v. Williams, 91 N. C., 477 ; Edwards v. Cowper, 99 N. C., 421 . … The mere fact that he sawed them into boards and received the value of them in the shape of lumber, could not destroy the fact that he got their value, as logs, in cash.

In re Drainage of Ahoskie Creek

257 N.C. 337 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1962

In O’Neal v. … State v. Mills, 244 N.C. 487 , 94 S.E. 2d 324 ; Allen v. Allen, 244 N.C. 446 , 94 S.E. 2d 325 ; Parsons v. Benfield, 228 N.C. 651 , 46 S.E. 2d 829 ; Porter v. Lumber Co., 164 N.C. 396 , 80 S.E. 443 ; Thompson v. R.

Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'n

344 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1996

In Fulton v. … In Jackson v.

Stroud v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

133 N.C. 253 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1903

The Code, see. 550; Simmons v. Andrews, 106 *254 N. C., 201. … Peebles v. Braswell, 107 N. C., 68 ; Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622 , and the counter motion to dismiss for failure to print tbe record and briefs within the time prescribed by Rule 34, 131 N.

Hooper v. . Hooper

165 N.C. 605 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1914

Perkins v. Perkins , 88 N.C. 41 ; Hansley v. Hansley , 32 N.C. 506 . True, in the case of Broom v. … Broom v. Broom , 130 N.C. 562 ; S. v. Gee , 92 N.C. pp. 756-762 ; S. v. Ballard , 79 N.C. 627 .

Collie v. Commissioners of Franklin County

145 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1907

*Page 124 It is admitted that the questions presented by this appeal have been passed upon adversely to the contention of the defendant in two cases — Barksdale v. Comrs. , 93 N.C. 473 , and Board of Education v. … Board v. Comrs. , 111 N.C. 585 . "Schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged," says the Constitution. Why?

Starbuck v. Town of Havelock

252 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1960

Sanitary District v. Lenoir, 249 N.C. 96 , 105 S.E. 2d 411 ; Saluda v. Polk County, 207 N.C. 180 , 176 S.E. 298 ; Starmount Co. v. Hamilton Lakes, 205 N.C. 514 , 171 S.E. 909 . … Constantian v. Anson County, 244 N.C. 221 , 93 S.E. 2d 163 ; Banks v. Raleigh, 220 N.C. 35 , 16 S.E. 2d 413 ; Bank v. Lacy, 188 N.C. 25 , 123 S.E. 475 ; Commissioners v. Boring, 175 N.C. 105 , 95 S.E. 43 ; Smith v.

Boykin v. . Barnes

76 N.C. 318 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1877

Summers v. McKay 64 N. C. 555 . They certainly have not placed themselves in a better situation. … State v. Brown, 67 N. C. 475 , does *320 not apply ; there was no novation here. • The note sued on was not subject to scale. There is no error. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed-

Troy v. . Troy

60 N.C. 624 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1864

Cited: Parks v. Robinson , 138 N.C. 271 ; Herring v. Williams , 153 N.C. 235 ; s. c. , 158 N.C. 4 , 9 , 18 ; Mabry v. Brown , 162 N.C. 221 , 223 . *Page 412 (628)

Gregg v. City of Wilmington

155 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1911

Quimby had been permitted by the city to pile boards upon a street in front of his house while making repairs on it. This was negligently done, and the city was compelled to pay damages to a person injured thereby. … Brown v. Louisburg , 126 N.C. 701 ; Raleigh v. R. R. , 129 N.C. 265 ; and those cases can not in any way be distinguished from the one now under consideration.

Tuttle v. Junior Building Corp.

228 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1948

E., 558 , and usually, a corporation may sell, transfer, and convey its corporate real estate only when authorized to do so by its board of directors. G. S. 55-26 (10). These statutory provisions (G. S. 55-48; G. … S. 55-26 (10)), are supplemented by a stipulation in defendant’s'bylaws as follows: “Full executive power shall be vested in the board of directors in the transaction of any and all business of the corporation of any and