Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

2.29s

  • State v. . Langley

    209 N.C. 178 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 1936

    S., 3379 (2), S. v. Hammond, 188 *181 N. C., 602, 125 S. E., 402 . … S. v. Rose, 200 N. C., 342 , 156 S. E., 916 . In S. v. Singleton, 183 N. C., 738 , 110 S.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In Re Watson

    273 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1968

    Jones v. Board of Education, 185 N.C. 303 , 117 S.E. 37 . … Language to the same, effect is found in Buchko v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 196 Pa. Super. 559 , 175 A. 2d 914 , and Watson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 176 Pa.

    Cited 83 timesPublished
  • Wilson-Stamey Grocery Co. v. Ross

    194 N.C. 109 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 25, 1927

    Plyler v. Elliott has been approved in Trust Co. v. Porter, 191 N. C., 672 , in Chappell v. Surety Co., 191 N. C., 703 , in Overman v. Casualty Co., 193 N. C., 86 , and in Wiseman v. Lacy, 193 N. C., 751 . … In Overman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. . Bridgers

    172 N.C. 879 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 13, 1916

    S. v. Vinson, 68 N. C., 335 ; Brown v. Emsey, 81 N. C., 245 ; S. v. Christmas, 101 N. C., 749 ; S. v. Costner, 127 N. C., 566 ; S. v. Lytle, 117 N. C., 799 ; S. v. Carmon, 145 N. C., 481 ; S. v. Walker, 149 N. C., 527 . … Brown v. State, 141 Ga., 5 . There was no error in overruling tbe motion to nonsuit and submitting tbe case to tbe jury upon tbe evidence. . * No error.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • In Re Broughton Estate

    210 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1936

    The trial court held that the case was controlled by the decision in Little v. Raleigh, 195 N. C., 793 , 143 S. E., 827 . The two cases are not alike. … Here, the traffic conditions as found by the board, “have materially changed since the former application was acted on in 1932.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Crump.

    138 N.C. 32 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1905

    Brown, J., after stating the facts: The application of the Buie in Shelley’s Case to the item of the will by virtue of which James W. … Dawson v. Quinnerly, 118 N. C., at 188. In holding that the interest of James W.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. . Peters

    107 N.C. 876 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

    State v. Brown, 79 N. C., 642 . … State v. Collins, 85 N. C , 511; State v. Brown, 79 N. C., 642 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Ellar v. Ray

    9 N.C. 568 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1823

    Taylor, Chief-Justice, delivered the Court’s opinion: The Plaintiff claims by virtue of a prior levy of two executions issuing from a Justice’s judgment against Brown, who claims under a posterior levy. … It is impossible to distinguish this case from Lash v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moreland v. . Wamboldt

    208 N.C. 35 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1935

    Thornton v. Brady, 100 N. C., 38 ; Dixon v. Osborne, 201 N. C., 489 . … See, also, Dula v. School Trustees, 177 N. C., 426 , and cases there cited. Reversed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. . Meadows Company

    152 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1910

    *604 Brown, J. Taking the plaintiff’s evidence in the most favorable view for him, we are of opinion that the motion to nonsuit should have been sustained. … As the road was being constructed' and not'Operated, the principles laid down in Nicholson v. R. R., 138 N. C., 516 , and reiterated at this term in O’Neal v. R. R., ante 404, bar a recovery.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hines v. . Rocky Mount

    162 N.C. 409 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1913

    may create and appoint a board of health to exercise and carry out such powers under the supervision and control of the first mentioned board. … Smith v. Sedalia , 182 Mo., 1 ; Grantham v. Gibson , 41 Wn. 125 . Downs v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State v. . Mosley

    212 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1938

    Motion of the State to remand the cause for correction of the record will be allowed in accordance with S. v. Brown , 203 N.C. 513 , 166 S.E. 396 . Remanded.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Barnes

    236 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1952

    Chambers v. Allen, 233 N.C. 195 , 63 S.E. 2d 212 ; Carson v. Doggett, 231 N.C. 629 , 58 S.E. 2d 609 ; Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122 , 52 S.E. 2d 377 ; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707 , 51 S.E. 2d 307 . … Bowen v. Darden, 233 N.C. 443 , 64 S.E. 2d 285 ; Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 542 , 61 S.E. 2d 613 ; Ingold v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Strother v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

    211 N.C. 738 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1937

    Brown v. Tel. Co., 198 N. C., 771 , 153 S. E., 457 . The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled, as it is amply sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Hayes v. Tel. Co., ante, 192.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reston v. Executors of Clayton

    6 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1812

    If they did not vest before that time, it is clear that all the grand-children are entitled ; if they did vest before that time, we aro authorised by the case of the Attorney General v. Crispin, (1 Brown, Ch.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. . Insurance Co.

    222 N.C. 754 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1942

    S., 446; Rental Co. v. Justice , 211 N.C. 54 , 188 S.E. 609 . Furthermore, the appeal is dismissable for failure of the record to show the organization of the court below. Rule 19; Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Schlagel v. Schlagel

    253 N.C. 787 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1961

    In addition the plaintiff in a suit under G.S. 50-16 must meet the requirements of the statute for divorce from bed and board as provided by G.S. 50-7. Pollard v. Pollard, 221 N.C. 46 , 19 S.E. 2d 1 ; Brooks v. … See also Saunderson v. Saunderson, 195 N.C. 169 , 141 S.E. 572 . As is shown in the cases cited above, G.S. 50-10 applies to a divorce from bed and board under G.S. 50-7.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • White v. . Hill

    125 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1899

    Beddingfield , at this term, as well as in McCall v. Webb , at this term. … the order of the said board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brookshire v. Asheville Electric Co.

    152 N.C. 669 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1910

    Brown, J. … While, possibly, not necessary to a decision of tbis case, yet we deem it proper to say for future guidance that we approve tbe opinion in Hemphill v. Lumber Co., 141 N.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • White v. . Kincaid

    149 N.C. 415 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1908

    Black v. Canal Co., 22 N. J. Eq., 130-404; Treadwell v. v. Salisbury Mfg. Co., 7 Gray, 393 . … Dewey v. R. R., 142 N. C., 392 ; Thomason v. R. R. (plaintiff’s appeal), 142 N. C., 318 ; Oglesby v. Altrill, 105 U. S., 605 .

    Cited 34 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.