Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.29s
209 N.C. 178 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 1936
S., 3379 (2), S. v. Hammond, 188 *181 N. C., 602, 125 S. E., 402 . … S. v. Rose, 200 N. C., 342 , 156 S. E., 916 . In S. v. Singleton, 183 N. C., 738 , 110 S.
Cited 15 timesPublished273 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1968
Jones v. Board of Education, 185 N.C. 303 , 117 S.E. 37 . … Language to the same, effect is found in Buchko v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 196 Pa. Super. 559 , 175 A. 2d 914 , and Watson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 176 Pa.
Cited 83 timesPublishedWilson-Stamey Grocery Co. v. Ross
194 N.C. 109 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 25, 1927
Plyler v. Elliott has been approved in Trust Co. v. Porter, 191 N. C., 672 , in Chappell v. Surety Co., 191 N. C., 703 , in Overman v. Casualty Co., 193 N. C., 86 , and in Wiseman v. Lacy, 193 N. C., 751 . … In Overman v.
Cited 2 timesPublished172 N.C. 879 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 13, 1916
S. v. Vinson, 68 N. C., 335 ; Brown v. Emsey, 81 N. C., 245 ; S. v. Christmas, 101 N. C., 749 ; S. v. Costner, 127 N. C., 566 ; S. v. Lytle, 117 N. C., 799 ; S. v. Carmon, 145 N. C., 481 ; S. v. Walker, 149 N. C., 527 . … Brown v. State, 141 Ga., 5 . There was no error in overruling tbe motion to nonsuit and submitting tbe case to tbe jury upon tbe evidence. . * No error.
Cited 21 timesPublished210 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1936
The trial court held that the case was controlled by the decision in Little v. Raleigh, 195 N. C., 793 , 143 S. E., 827 . The two cases are not alike. … Here, the traffic conditions as found by the board, “have materially changed since the former application was acted on in 1932.”
Cited 3 timesPublished138 N.C. 32 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1905
Brown, J., after stating the facts: The application of the Buie in Shelley’s Case to the item of the will by virtue of which James W. … Dawson v. Quinnerly, 118 N. C., at 188. In holding that the interest of James W.
Cited 6 timesPublished107 N.C. 876 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890
State v. Brown, 79 N. C., 642 . … State v. Collins, 85 N. C , 511; State v. Brown, 79 N. C., 642 .
Cited 27 timesPublished9 N.C. 568 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1823
Taylor, Chief-Justice, delivered the Court’s opinion: The Plaintiff claims by virtue of a prior levy of two executions issuing from a Justice’s judgment against Brown, who claims under a posterior levy. … It is impossible to distinguish this case from Lash v.
Cited 0 timesPublished208 N.C. 35 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1935
Thornton v. Brady, 100 N. C., 38 ; Dixon v. Osborne, 201 N. C., 489 . … See, also, Dula v. School Trustees, 177 N. C., 426 , and cases there cited. Reversed.
Cited 6 timesPublished152 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1910
*604 Brown, J. Taking the plaintiff’s evidence in the most favorable view for him, we are of opinion that the motion to nonsuit should have been sustained. … As the road was being constructed' and not'Operated, the principles laid down in Nicholson v. R. R., 138 N. C., 516 , and reiterated at this term in O’Neal v. R. R., ante 404, bar a recovery.
Cited 2 timesPublished162 N.C. 409 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1913
may create and appoint a board of health to exercise and carry out such powers under the supervision and control of the first mentioned board. … Smith v. Sedalia , 182 Mo., 1 ; Grantham v. Gibson , 41 Wn. 125 . Downs v.
Cited 20 timesPublished212 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1938
Motion of the State to remand the cause for correction of the record will be allowed in accordance with S. v. Brown , 203 N.C. 513 , 166 S.E. 396 . Remanded.
Cited 1 timesPublished236 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1952
Chambers v. Allen, 233 N.C. 195 , 63 S.E. 2d 212 ; Carson v. Doggett, 231 N.C. 629 , 58 S.E. 2d 609 ; Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122 , 52 S.E. 2d 377 ; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707 , 51 S.E. 2d 307 . … Bowen v. Darden, 233 N.C. 443 , 64 S.E. 2d 285 ; Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 542 , 61 S.E. 2d 613 ; Ingold v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedStrother v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
211 N.C. 738 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1937
Brown v. Tel. Co., 198 N. C., 771 , 153 S. E., 457 . The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled, as it is amply sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Hayes v. Tel. Co., ante, 192.
Cited 0 timesPublishedReston v. Executors of Clayton
6 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1812
If they did not vest before that time, it is clear that all the grand-children are entitled ; if they did vest before that time, we aro authorised by the case of the Attorney General v. Crispin, (1 Brown, Ch.
Cited 0 timesPublished222 N.C. 754 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1942
S., 446; Rental Co. v. Justice , 211 N.C. 54 , 188 S.E. 609 . Furthermore, the appeal is dismissable for failure of the record to show the organization of the court below. Rule 19; Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublished253 N.C. 787 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1961
In addition the plaintiff in a suit under G.S. 50-16 must meet the requirements of the statute for divorce from bed and board as provided by G.S. 50-7. Pollard v. Pollard, 221 N.C. 46 , 19 S.E. 2d 1 ; Brooks v. … See also Saunderson v. Saunderson, 195 N.C. 169 , 141 S.E. 572 . As is shown in the cases cited above, G.S. 50-10 applies to a divorce from bed and board under G.S. 50-7.
Cited 15 timesPublished125 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1899
Beddingfield , at this term, as well as in McCall v. Webb , at this term. … the order of the said board.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrookshire v. Asheville Electric Co.
152 N.C. 669 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1910
Brown, J. … While, possibly, not necessary to a decision of tbis case, yet we deem it proper to say for future guidance that we approve tbe opinion in Hemphill v. Lumber Co., 141 N.
Cited 14 timesPublished149 N.C. 415 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1908
Black v. Canal Co., 22 N. J. Eq., 130-404; Treadwell v. v. Salisbury Mfg. Co., 7 Gray, 393 . … Dewey v. R. R., 142 N. C., 392 ; Thomason v. R. R. (plaintiff’s appeal), 142 N. C., 318 ; Oglesby v. Altrill, 105 U. S., 605 .
Cited 34 timesPublished
Ask Donna