Case law

Jarrett v. Green

230 N.C. 104 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1949

Van Alstyne v. Brown, 77 N.J.Eq. 455, 78 Atl. 678 ; Scott on Trusts, Yol. 2, See. 176. … Bank v. Crowder, 194 N.C. 312 , 139 S.E. 601 ; Costner v. Cotton Mills Co., 155 N.C. 128 , 71 S.E. 85 ; Lemly v. Atwood, 65 N.C. 46 .

State v. Boone

299 N.C. 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1980

Essie Brown was present in Vandell Cross’ residence when the deceased and defendant entered. Being scared, Essie Brown locked herself in the bathroom. … State v. Freeman, 275 N.C. 662 , 170 S.E. 2d 461 (1969).

State v. Johnson

278 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1971

Outside the house near a trash can they found three oak boards, on one of which there were blood stains. These boards, though introduced in evidence, are not otherwise described in the record. … State v. Davis, supra; State v. McLawhorn, supra; State v. Freeman, 275 N.C. 662 , 170 S.E. 2d 461 .

Wilmington v. . Bryan

141 N.C. 666 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1906

Co. v. Williams , 91 N.C. 69 ; Ballard v. Ins. Co. , 119 N.C. 187 . … Mial v. Ellington , 134 N.C. 131 ; Missouri v. Walker, supra; Pennie v. Reis , 132 U.S. 464 .

Bernard v. . Bowen

214 N.C. 121 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1938

The court below held that there had been no abandonment of right to the property by the defendant Board of Education so as to divest its *123 title, and accordingly rendered judgment for defendant board and against tbe plaintiff … In Church v. Bragaw, 144 N. C., 126 , 56 S. E., 688 , it was said: “Conditions subsequent, especially wben relied upon to work a forfeiture, are strictly construed. Woodruff v. Woodruff, 44 N. J., 353.

Gibbs v. . R. R.

199 N.C. 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 20, 1930

The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Brown v. Express Co. , 192 N.C. 25 , 133 S.E. 414 , and Sumrell v. R. R. , 152 N.C. 269 , 67 S.E. 585 . No error.

Hornthal v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

166 N.C. 602 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1914

Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 34 Sup. Ct. Reporter (U. S.), p. 955. In that case it appeared that the telegram was sent from South Carolina to Washington, D. C., and the negligence occurred in the latter place. … With reference to the facts as stated in the Brown case, the Court, by Mr.

In Re Watson

273 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1968

Jones v. Board of Education, 185 N.C. 303 , 117 S.E. 37 . … Language to the same, effect is found in Buchko v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 196 Pa. Super. 559 , 175 A. 2d 914 , and Watson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 176 Pa.

Strother v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

211 N.C. 738 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1937

Brown v. Tel. Co., 198 N. C., 771 , 153 S. E., 457 . The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled, as it is amply sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Hayes v. Tel. Co., ante, 192.

Lane v. . Stanly

65 N.C. 153 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1871

It also provides for a State board of education and a superintendent ; and the General Assembly has made a liberal appropriation' of the taxes, and an additional $100,000 for school purposes. … —The case of Slover and others v. Berry and others, from Craven, involved the same questions and was decided in the same way.

State v. . Bridgers

172 N.C. 879 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 13, 1916

S. v. Vinson, 68 N. C., 335 ; Brown v. Emsey, 81 N. C., 245 ; S. v. Christmas, 101 N. C., 749 ; S. v. Costner, 127 N. C., 566 ; S. v. Lytle, 117 N. C., 799 ; S. v. Carmon, 145 N. C., 481 ; S. v. Walker, 149 N. C., 527 . … Brown v. State, 141 Ga., 5 . There was no error in overruling tbe motion to nonsuit and submitting tbe case to tbe jury upon tbe evidence. . * No error.

Thomas Jefferson Classical Acad. Charter Sch. v. Cleveland Cty. Bd. of Educ.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 2016

No. 400A15 Filed 10 June 2016 THOMAS JEFFERSON CLASSICAL ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL, PIEDMONT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL, and LINCOLN CHARTER SCHOOL v. … Schafer, Legal Counsel, North Carolina School Boards Association, amicus curiae. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

State v. . Long

81 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

State v. Long, 76 N. C., 254 . … The case states that the order of appointment was delivered by him to the clerk of the board, when the justices of the peace composing the board were not present; and no order of the board relieving the defendant on the condition

Commissioners of Wake v. City of Raleigh

88 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

The object of the present action is the recovery of moneys alleged to belong to the plaintiffs, as a board of education for the county, collected and paid into the treasury of the city of Raleigh. … Railroad v. Morrison, 82 N. C., 141 , and again recognized in Neal v. Becknell, 85 N. C., 299 . The force of the decision is not impaired by the ruling in McPeters v. Ray, 85 N.

North Carolina Ass'n of Electronic Tax Filers, Inc. v. Graham

333 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1993

In either situation the critical consideration is the overall effect of the statute on both local and interstate activity. *566 Brown-Forman Distillers v. N.Y. Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 578-79 , 90 L. … Sears, Roebuck and Co. v.

Bailey v. . Meadows Company

152 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1910

*604 Brown, J. Taking the plaintiff’s evidence in the most favorable view for him, we are of opinion that the motion to nonsuit should have been sustained. … As the road was being constructed' and not'Operated, the principles laid down in Nicholson v. R. R., 138 N. C., 516 , and reiterated at this term in O’Neal v. R. R., ante 404, bar a recovery.

In Re Harris

183 N.C. 633 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1922

In Mills v. … This principle of interpretation as to the meaning of these amendments had been previously announced in Brown v.

Smith v. Barnes

236 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1952

Chambers v. Allen, 233 N.C. 195 , 63 S.E. 2d 212 ; Carson v. Doggett, 231 N.C. 629 , 58 S.E. 2d 609 ; Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122 , 52 S.E. 2d 377 ; Bundy v. Powell, 229 N.C. 707 , 51 S.E. 2d 307 . … Bowen v. Darden, 233 N.C. 443 , 64 S.E. 2d 285 ; Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 542 , 61 S.E. 2d 613 ; Ingold v.

Reston v. Executors of Clayton

6 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1812

If they did not vest before that time, it is clear that all the grand-children are entitled ; if they did vest before that time, we aro authorised by the case of the Attorney General v. Crispin, (1 Brown, Ch.

Cherry v. Andrews

229 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1948

E., 848 , in which Brooks v. Britt, 15 N. … See Booker v. Highlands, 198 N. C., 282 , 151 S. E., 635 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N. C., 47 , 6 S. E. (2d), 842 . For error pointed out, the judgment of nonsuit entered below is Reversed.