Case law

Southern Railway Co. v. City of Winston-Salem

275 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1969

The crucial question is whether the Board of Aldermen had authority to allocate the costs of construction and maintenance in this manner. … In support thereof, plaintiff cites City of Memphis v. Southern Ry. Co., 67 S.W. 2d 552 (Tenn. 1934).

Moye v. . McLawhorn

208 N.C. 812 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1935

In Manuel v. The Board of Commissioners of Cumberland County, 98 N. C., 9 , 3 S. … In Templeton v. Beard, 159 N. C., 63 , 74 S. E., 735 , a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint was affirmed.

North Carolina Ass'n of Electronic Tax Filers, Inc. v. Graham

333 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1993

In either situation the critical consideration is the overall effect of the statute on both local and interstate activity. *566 Brown-Forman Distillers v. N.Y. Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 578-79 , 90 L. … Sears, Roebuck and Co. v.

Sylva Supply Co. v. Watt

181 N.C. 432 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921

Aydlett v. Brown, 153 N. C., 334 . And again, in Rosser v. Bynum, 168 N. … C., 435 ; Kerr v. Saunders, 122 N. C., 635 ; Pruden v. R. R., 121 N. C., 511 ; Petit v. Woodlief, 115 N. C., 125 ; Koonce v. Russell, 103 N. C., 179 . See, also, Mercer v. Lumber Co., 173 N. C., 49 .

State v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.

659 S.E.2d 7 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 2008

659 S.E.2d 7 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. … Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to The American Tobacco Company, and Lorillard Tobacco Company. No. 2P05-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Duggins v. NC ST. BD. OF CPA EXAMINERS

294 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1978

Duggins v. Board of Examiners, 25 N.C.App. 131, 134 , 212 S.E.2d 657, 660 . … Martin v. Walton, 368 U.S. 25 , 82 S.Ct. 1 , 7 L.Ed.2d 5 (1961) ( per curiam ); Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U.S. 319 , 57 S.Ct. 483 , 81 L.Ed. 674 (1937).

State v. Walker

658 S.E.2d 664 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2008

658 S.E.2d 664 (2008) STATE v. Christopher WALKER, et al. No. 16P05-3. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 1, 2008. Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Browning. Daniel L.

State v. Leroux

326 N.C. 368 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1990

State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E.2d 1 . We conclude that this argument has no merit. … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , 313 S.E.2d 585 (1984).

Bailey v. . Bryson

214 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1938

of elections of such county only upon the written request of the board of county commissioners therein, or upon a petition to said board of elections signed by at least fifteen per centum of the registered voters in said … Springs v. Refining Co., 205 N. C., 444 , 171 S. E., 635 , and cases there cited.

Jones v. City of New Bern

184 N.C. 131 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1922

The defendants contend that the board of trustees of the *134 New Bern Graded Schools is an official board of said city, and its debts are debts of the city, and, therefore, the debts proposed to he funded by means of said … Hammond v. McRae, 182 N. C., 747 . On consideration of that case, we think it is unnecessary to cite further authority, and the judgment of his Honor is Affirmed.

White v. . Hill

125 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1899

Beddingfield , at this term, as well as in McCall v. Webb , at this term. … the order of the said board.

Nissen v. City of Winston-Salem

206 N.C. 888 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1934

Tbe Michigan Court in People v. Salsbury, 96 N. … See, also, State v. Loechner, 59 L. R. A., 915.

Dowling v. . Winters

208 N.C. 521 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1935

The validity of the act was upheld in Ashley v. Brown, 198 N. C., 369 , 151 S. E., 725 ; Bigham, v. Foor, 201 N. C., 14 , 158 S. E., 548 . … Fisher v. Trust Co., 138 N. C., 90 , 50 S. E., 592 ; Wainwright v. Massenburg, 129 N. C., 46 , 39 S. E., 725 .

Bailey v. State

330 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1991

Brown, Joan W. Brown, Margaret M. Brown, John W. Buchan, Eunice W. Bullard, Dewey L. Butler, McCauley C. Byrum, Gertrude G. Cahoon, Joseph H. Calder, Catherine N. Cann, Dorothy T. Carmichael, Maurice O. Caton, Robert A. … See also Oil Corp. v. Clayton Comr. of Revenue, 267 N.C. at 20 , 147 S.E.2d at 526 ("The law does not contemplate that administrative boards shall pass upon constitutional questions.").

State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Pender v. McPherson

79 N.C. 524 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1878

Defendants demurred to the complaint and assigned for •cause: “Ist-That the action can be maintained only in the name and at the instance of the county treasurer and not by the board of commissioners.” … In Commissioners of Bladen v. Clarke, 73 N.

Stewart v. . Lumber Co.

146 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1907

Three justices concurring in the opinion of Justice Brown upon each issue, it becomes the opinion of the Court, and a new trial is ordered upon the second issue, relating to damages. Cited: S. v. … Fulton , 149 N.C. 501 ; Powell v. Fiber Co. , 150 N.C. 15 ; Jones v. R. R., ib. , 476; Blackburn v. Lumber Co. , 152 N.C. 363 ; Marlowe v. Bland , 154 N.C. 146 ; Dover v. Mfg. Co. , 157 N.C. 329 ; Bucken v. R.

Jones v. . Thomas

4 N.C. 335 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1816

Cited: Bradhurst v. Pearson , 32 N.C. 56 ; Brown v. Conner, id. , 78; Neil v. Childs, id. , 198; Kelly v. Muse , 33 N.C. 186 , 191 .

Royster v. . Farrell

115 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894

Brown v. Becknall, 5 Jones’ Eq., 423; Ray v. Pearce, 84 N. C., 485 ; Hughes v. Edwards, 8 Wheat., 489 ; Simmons v. Ballard, 102 N. C., 105 . … Hill v. Hilliard, 103 N. C., 34 . New Trial.

Arey Brick & Lumber Co. v. Waggoner

198 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 1930

Jenkins v. Griffin, 175 N. C., 184 , 95 S. E., 166 ; Brown v. Sheets, 197 N. C., 268 . Affirmed.

Burnette v. City of Goldsboro

665 S.E.2d 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2008

Hinnant v. CITY OF GOLDSBORO. No. 73P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 26, 2008. James E. Eldridge, Wilmington, for William R. Burnette et al. W. Harrell Everett, Jr., Goldsboro, Darrell K. … Brown, for City of Goldsboro.