Case law

State v. . Estes

185 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 26, 1923

S. v. Vines, 93 N. C., 493 ; S. v. Winchester, 113 N. C., 642 ; S. v. Riley, ibid., 648; S. v. Woolard, 119 N. C., 779 . … S. v. Tackett, 8 N. C., 210 ; S. v. Hill, 20 N. C., 629 (491); S. v. Barfield, 30 N. C., 344; S. v. Howell, 31 N. C., 485 ; S. v. Carter, 76 N. C., 20 .

Pickens v. . Commissioners

112 N.C. 698 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1893

Kyle v. Commissioners, 75 N. C., 445 . … Three times, according to the act, these appraisements are considered by sworn officers: First, by the township or ward assessors; secondly, by the board of equalization; and thirdly, by the Board of County Commissioners

Nelson v. . Nelson

176 N.C. 191 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1918

Brown, J. Plaintiff is the wife of defendant, living separate and apart from her husband, but not divorced. … Arrington, supra; Kearney v. Vann, 154 N. C., 316. Affirmed.

Smith v. State

298 N.C. 115 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 4, 1979

the Board’s exercise of those functions. … El Paso v.

Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. Perdue

366 N.C. 289 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2012

Plaintiffs argue that two recent First Amendment decisions from the United States Supreme Court require that we hold their systems to be protected under the First Amendment: Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. … Similarly, Brown does not apply here.

Parmele v. Eaton

240 N.C. 539 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 9, 1954

See Insurance Company v. Parmele, 214 N.C. 63 , pp. 69 and 70, 197 S.E. 714 . … Jur., Waters, Sec. 119; Insurance Co. v. Parmele, supra ( 214 N.C. 63 ). Briefly stated, the rule with us “is that all water courses are regarded navigable in law that are navigable in fact.” Development Co. v.

Jones v. Commissioners of Franklin

88 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

Boing v. R. R. Co., 87 N. C., 360 . … P., § 315; Wilmington v. Atkinson, ante 54.

Marshall v. . Hastings

174 N.C. 480 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1917

as such board were authorized and empowered by law to take the plaintiff’s land and to construct the road through his farm. … Fore v. Feimster, 171 N. C., 551 ; Hipp v. Farrell, 173 N. C., 91 , S. E., 831; Templeton v. Heard, 159 N. C., 63 . Affirmed.

James River Equipment, Inc. v. Mecklenburg Utilities, Inc.

361 N.C. 355 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 2007

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 19th day of October 2006 by Defendant (Orange County Board of Education) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals

State Ex Rel. Amick v. Lancaster

228 N.C. 157 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1947

S. v. Lueders, 214 N. C., 558 , 200 S. E., 22 . … S., 19-2, should be applied against an alcoholic control board set up under color of legislative authority, or against one who rents a building to such a board for the purpose of operating a liquor control store.

MacRackan v. Bank of Columbus

164 N.C. 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1913

Ed.), 695; Smith v. Cuff, 6 M. and S., 160. And in Atkinson v. Denby, 7 H. and N. (Exch.), 933, approving Smith v. Cuff, supra, and Smith v. … In Smith v.

Bailey v. . Bryson

214 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1938

of elections of such county only upon the written request of the board of county commissioners therein, or upon a petition to said board of elections signed by at least fifteen per centum of the registered voters in said … Springs v. Refining Co., 205 N. C., 444 , 171 S. E., 635 , and cases there cited.

Tate v. . Greenlee

7 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1819

Reddick v. Leggat , ante 539, and Orbison v. Morrison , ante 551 Cherry v. Slade , ante 82, contain a more full view of the principles which govern the Court in this case. Cited: Brown v. House , 118 N.C. 884 .

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Preston

325 N.C. 438 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 1989

Penny v. Board of Elections, 217 N.C. 276, 279 , 7 S.E.2d 559, 561 (1940). … Penny v. Board of Elections, 217 N.C. at 279 , 7 S.E.2d at 561 .

Ellis v. . Perley

200 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1931

Besseliew v. Brown , 177 N.C. 65 ; VonGlahn v. DeRossett , 76 N.C. 292 ." Justice v. Sherard , 197 N.C. 237 ; Buchanan v. Feldspar Milling Co., ante , at p. 53. … Meyer v. Fenner , 196 N.C. at p. 477; Winston-Salem v. Ashby , 194 N.C. at p. 390; Efird v. Winston-Salem , 199 N.C. at p. 35. In Enloe v.

Jones v. City of New Bern

184 N.C. 131 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1922

The defendants contend that the board of trustees of the *134 New Bern Graded Schools is an official board of said city, and its debts are debts of the city, and, therefore, the debts proposed to he funded by means of said … Hammond v. McRae, 182 N. C., 747 . On consideration of that case, we think it is unnecessary to cite further authority, and the judgment of his Honor is Affirmed.

Street v. . Meadows

33 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1850

Cotton v. Evans, 1 Dev. & Bat. Eq. 284 . Norment v. Johnson, 10 Ire. 89. … Willis v. Hill, 2 Dev. & Bat 231.

Shelton v. White

163 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1913

C., 355 ; Mann v. Gibbs, 156 N. C., 44 ; Carter v. Commissioners (the “Mattamuskeet Lake” case), ib.,, 183; Forest v. R. R., 159 N. C., 547 ; Commissioners v. Webb, 160 N. C., 595; Caravan v. Commissioners, 161 N. … C., 77 ; Staton v. Staton, 148 N. C., 490 . Suck legislation bas been repeatedly beld valid in tbe United States Supreme Court, as in Wurtz v. Hoagland, 114 U. S., 605 ; Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U.

West v. North Carolina Department of Conservation & Development

229 N.C. 232 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1948

Logan v. Johnson, 218 N. C., 200 , 10 S. E. (2d), 653 ; Gilmore v. Board of Education, 222 N. C., 358 , 23 S. E. (2d), 292 ; Bank v. Motor Co., 216 N. C., 432 , 5 S. E. (2d), 318 . … Neely v. Statesville, 212 N. C., 365 , 193 S. E., 664 ; Slade v. Hosiery Mills, 209 N. C., 823 , 184 S. E., 844 ; Gilmore v. Board of Education, supra. Gabriel v. Newton, 227 N. C., 314 , 42 S.

Perry v. Bassenger

219 N.C. 838 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1941

Johnson v. Farlow, 35 N. C., 84 ; Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 400 , 46 S. E., 762 . In Greenleaf v. Bartlett, 146 N. C., 495 , 60 S. … E., 419 , this Court adopted the dissenting views of Chief Justice Taney and Justice Catron in Moore v. Brown, 11 How. (U.