Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.73s
263 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1965
Thornton, 180 N.C. 90 , 104 S.E. 74 ; Boyd v. Campbell, supra ( 192 N.C. 398 , 135 S.E. 121 ).” Davis v. Brown, 241 N.C. 116 , 84 S.E. 2d 334 . … Davis v. Brown, supra. To the extent that Lee v. Barefoot, supra, is in conflict with this opinion, it is overruled. Affirmed. RodmaN and Higgins, JJ., dissent.
Cited 1 timesPublished123 N.C. 92 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1898
Brown, Judge. Nothing herein contained shall affect the right of either party to appeal to the Supreme Court. G. H. Brown, Judge; L. J. Moore, W. D Mclver; Simmons, Pou & Ward, attorneys for plaintiff. J. E. … Tucker v. Davis, 77 N. C., 330 ; Carman v. Emerson, supra; Pollock, supra, 148; Bishop, supra, Section 211.
Cited 5 timesPublished647 S.E.2d 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 22, 2007
647 S.E.2d 612 (2007) FARM BUREAU v. ARMWOOD, et al. No. 99A07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 22, 2007. R. Michael Strickland, Glenn C. Raynor, for N.C. Farm Bureau. Frank A. … Brown, Greensboro, for Defense Attorneys. M. David Rhodes, for NCATL.
Cited 0 timesPublished115 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894
Brown v. Becknall, 5 Jones’ Eq., 423; Ray v. Pearce, 84 N. C., 485 ; Hughes v. Edwards, 8 Wheat., 489 ; Simmons v. Ballard, 102 N. C., 105 . … Hill v. Hilliard, 103 N. C., 34 . New Trial.
Cited 4 timesPublishedFarmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers
211 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1937
Walton v. McKesson, 101 N. C., 428 , 7 S. E., 566 ; Payne v. Brown, 205 N. C., 785 , 172 S. E., 348 . Failure to send up adequate record has uniformly resulted in dismissal of the appeal. S. v. Lbr. Co., 207 N. … E., 358 ; Waters v. Waters, supra; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788 , 156 S. E., 126 . Appeal dismissed.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMiller v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
154 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1911
Brown, J. Taking the allegations of the complaint to be trae, as we must upon demurrer, we are of opinion that the demurrer was properly overruled. … Hancock v. Tel. Co., 142 N. C., 164 . Affirmed.
Cited 4 timesPublished184 N.C. 667 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 25, 1922
In S. v. Banner, 149 N. C., at p. 521, the objection was that three years had elapsed without a revision of the jury list by the board of commissioners. It was held that this did not avoid the panel. … of commissioners, and the box by the clerk of the board.
Cited 10 timesPublished47 N.C. 454 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1855
Eor the reasons given and upon the authorities cited, in the case of White v. Brown, ante 403, decided at the present term, the plaintiff cannot recover.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStone v. . Comrs. of Stoneville
210 N.C. 226 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1936
Co. v. Stinson, ante, 69; Mecklenburg County v. Sterchi Bros. Stores, Inc., ante, 79; County of Mecklenburg v. Piedmont Fire Ins. Co., ante, 171. N. C. … In Woodmen of the World v. Comrs. of Lenoir, 208 N.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDixon v. Commissioners of Beaufort
80 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879
Slade v. Governor, 3 Dev., 365 . … Coffield v. McNeil, 74 N. C., 535 ; Vann v. Pipkin, 77 N. C., 408 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedJones v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
194 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1927
Plaintiff testified that if the ladder had been fastened to the weather-boarding of the house by hooks, as it rested on the eaves of the roof, it would not have slipped and knocked him off the roof. … Reid v. Rees, 155 N. C., 230 .
Cited 6 timesPublished303 N.C. 102 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1981
On 17 February 1978, pursuant to G.S. 105-241.2, the executor filed for review before the Tax Review Board. The Board held a hearing and affirmed the decision of the Secretary of Revenue. … State v. Fulcher, 294 N.C. 503 , 243 S.E. 2d 338 (1978).
Cited 12 timesPublishedThomas v. Southern Railway Co.
131 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1902
In Capehart v. R. Co., 81 N. C., at page 444; 31 Am. Rep., 505 ; Ashe, J., citing Smith v. R. Co., 64 N. C., 235 , and Glenn v. R. Co., 63 N. … To same purport, Wood v. R. Co., 118 N. C., at page 1063. Brown v. Tel. Co., 111 N. C., at page 191; 32 Am. St. Rep., 793 ; 17 L. R.
Cited 1 timesPublished216 N.C. 734 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1940
Board of Health as required by section 23 of the act. … Associated Cosmetologists v. Ritchie, 206 N. C., 808 , 175 S. E., 308 . The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublished129 N.C. 121 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1901
Broadnax v. Groom , 64 N.C. 244 ; Satterthwaite v. Commissioners , 76 N.C. 153 ; Evans v. Commissioners , 89 N.C. 154 ; McKeithan v. Commissioners , 92 N.C. 243 ; Charlotte v. Sheppard , 120 N.C. 411 ; Rodman v. … Cain v. Commissioners , 86 N.C. 8 ; Simpson v. Commissioners , 84 N.C. 158 ; Evans v. Commissioners , 89 N.C. 154 ; Halcombe v. Commissioners , 89 N.C. 346 . It is contended that the case of Evans v.
Cited 7 timesPublished214 N.C. 276 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1938
S. v. Whitehurst, 212 N. C., 300 , 193 S. E., 657 ; U. S. v. Wiltberger, 5 Wheat., 76 ; 25 R. C. L., 1076. Whether the defendant comes under sections 6 and 8 of the act is not before us for decision. Roach v. … S. v. Williams, 210 N. C., 159 , 185 S. E., 661 ; S. v. Van Doran, 109 N. C., 864 , 14 S. E., 32 . The use of “and/or” in the warrant adds nothing to its clarity. Freeman v. Charlotte, 206 N. C., 913 , 174 S.
Cited 11 timesPublished118 N.C. 450 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896
Bank v. Burgwyn, 110 N. C., 267 ; Bank v. School Com., at. this Term. The doctrine is held not to apply in certain conditions, as to minor officers of municipalities. Moffitt v. Asheville, 103 *456 N. C., 237. … We have said at this Term of the Court that information received by one member of a school board about the business of the board should have been given to the board, and that notice to him was notice to the board, and they
Cited 19 timesPublished48 N.C. 180 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1855
Winstead v. Reid, Busbee 76, and Cutter v. Powell, 6 Term Rep. 320 ; White v. Brown & Son, 2 Jones’ 403.
Cited 4 timesPublished261 N.C. 31 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1964
Ward v. Martin, 175 N.C. 287 , 95 S.E. 621 ; Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 , 35 L. Ed. 1110 ; Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591 , 40 L. Ed. 819 ; 58 Am. … Brown v. Walker, supra. In Brown v.
Cited 42 timesPublishedChampion v. Seaboard Air Line Railway
151 N.C. 197 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 27, 1909
Gerringer v. Railroad, 146 N. C., 32 ; Purnell v. Railroad, 122 N. C., 832. … Royster v. Railroad, 147 N. C., 347 ; Cooper v. Railroad, 140 N. C., 213; Strickland v. Railroad, 150 N. C., 4 . .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna