Case law

Davis v. Heide & Co.

161 N.C. 476 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1913

We held in Morse v. Heide, 152 N. … The case of O’Brien v. Larringer, 36 S. C., 497, cited by the defendant’s counsel, is not in point. It is like the case of Morse v. Heide, supra.

Kiger v. . Terry

119 N.C. 456 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Thornton on Gifts and Advancements, 591 ; Melvin v. Bullard, 82 N. C., 33 ; James v. James, 76 N. C., 331 . … Harper v. Harper, 92 N. C., 300 .

State v. Walker

658 S.E.2d 664 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2008

658 S.E.2d 664 (2008) STATE v. Christopher WALKER, et al. No. 16P05-3. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 1, 2008. Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Browning. Daniel L.

Electrova Co. v. Spring Garden Insurance

156 N.C. 232 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1911

Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245 . (2) The effect upon the public interest, under the facts of this case, is too remote entirely to justify a court in refusing its aid to plaintiff to enforce the payment of the policy. … Harrell v. Watson, 63 N. C., 454 ; Brown v. Kinsey, supra; Collins v. Blanten, 1 Smith Leading Cases, 153.

Bailey v. . Caldwell

68 N.C. 471 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

The questions in this case are substantially the same as in Nichols v. McKee, ante , 429 and Welker v. Bledsoe, ante , 457, and are governed by the same principles and for the same reasons. … Cited: Welker v. Bledsoe, ante , 465; Brown v. Turner , 70 N.C. 107 ; Day's case , 124 N.C. 377 . (472)

Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.

172 N.C. 529 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1916

Joyner v. Earley, 139 N. C., 49 ; Worth v. Trust Co., 151 N. C., 196 ; Pritchard v. R. R., 166 N. C., 535 ; 31 Cyc., 409, 410, 411. … Boulhac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 4 ; Wilson v. Lineberger, 82 N. C., 413 ; S. v. Evans, 74 N. C., 325 . “No appeal lies from one Superior Court judge to another.” May v. Lumber Co., 119 N. C., 98 ; Alexander v.

Spruill v. . Davenport

178 N.C. 364 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919

Ruffin v. Garrett , 174 N.C. 134 . The passage quoted by plaintiff's counsel from 35 Cyc. 1095, does not sustain the position that the members of the board are liable individually. … Cited: Spitzer v. Comrs. , 188 N.C. 33 ; Bank v. Broom Co. , 188 N.C. 510 ; Causey v. Guilford County , 192 N.C. 307 ; Cody v. Barrett , 200 N.C. 44 ; Betts v. Jones , 203 N.C. 591 ; Art Society v.

Moore v. Rowland Lumber Co.

150 N.C. 261 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1909

Brown, J. An appeal will not lie to this Court from an interlocutory judgment of this character. … . *264 Tbe court acquired no jurisdiction over these plaintiffs as parties, nor was there any appearance by counsel for them, as in England v. Garner, 90 N. C., 198 .

Briant v. . Corpening

62 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1868

The necessity for such an allegation is shown by the case of Brown v. Carson, Bus. Eq., 272, and by several other cases contained in 3d Bat. Dig., Tit. Mortgage.

Perry v. Bassenger

219 N.C. 838 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1941

Johnson v. Farlow, 35 N. C., 84 ; Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 400 , 46 S. E., 762 . In Greenleaf v. Bartlett, 146 N. C., 495 , 60 S. … E., 419 , this Court adopted the dissenting views of Chief Justice Taney and Justice Catron in Moore v. Brown, 11 How. (U.

Saunders v. . Allen

208 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1935

Hanie v. Penland, 194 N. C., 234 ; Starling v. Morris, 202 N. C., 564 . Second: From all the facts appearing in the record, we do not think E. W. … Smith v. Hauser & Co., 206 N. C., 562 (563).

A. M. Sloan & Co. v. McDowell

75 N.C. 29 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1876

Browne v. Joy, 9 Johns. 221 . And so it was held of a suit pending in the Court of the U. S. for the district of Virginia. Walsh v. Durhin, 12, Johns. 99.

Combs v. Combs

273 N.C. 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1968

Sasser, Duke & Brown by J. Thomas Brown, Jr., Dees, Dees, Smith & Powell by William L. Powell, Jr., Goldsboro, for respondent appellees. HUSKINS, Justice. … In Sprinkle v.

McClintock v. . Insurance Co.

149 N.C. 35 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1908

Marsh v. Cohen, 68 N. C., 283 ; West v. Reynolds, 94 N. C., 333 . … This has been held lately by Brown, J., in Lentz v. Hinson, 146 N. C., 31 , and by Walker, in Blair v. Coakley, 136 N. C., 409 , citing many cases. In Johnson v. Andrews, 132 N.

Willis v. City of New Bern

191 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 31, 1926

Russell v. Monroe, 116 N. C., 720 ; Neal v. Marion, 126 N. C., 412 ; Fitzgerald v. Concord, 140 N. C., 110 ; Brown v. Durham, 141 N. C., 249 ; Darden v. Plymouth, 166 N. C., 492 ; Foster v. Tryon, 169 N. … Duke v. Belhaven, 174 N. C., 96 ; Bunch v. Edenton, 90 N. C., 431 ; Brown v. Durham, 141 N. C., 249 . In Brown v.

Cameron v. . Highway Com.

188 N.C. 84 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 21, 1924

Jones v. Boyd , 80 N.C. 258 ; Mayo v. Comrs. , 122 N.C. 5 ; Hooker v. Greenville , 130 N.C. 472 ; Hyatt v. DeHart , 140 N.C. 270 ; Lee v. Waynesville , 184 N.C. 565 ; School Committee v. … In Road Commission v.

McArthur v. . Griffith

147 N.C. 545 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1908

Busbee v. Macy, 85 N. C., 329 ; Busbee v. Lewis, 85 N. C., 332 ; Browning v. Lavendar, 104 N. C., 69 ; Thompson v. Etowah Iron Co., 91 Ga., 538 ; Lick v. Bay, 43 Cal., 83 . … Browning v. Lavendar, supra. The widow and heirs of J. P. Hannah properly brought their action to have the note and mortgage cancelled, so as to remove the cloud from their title. Byerly v. Humphrey, 95 N.

State Ex Rel. Ledford v. Greene

125 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1899

Greene claiming to be members of the County Board of School Directors under chap. 108 of the Public Laws of 1897. … This case, therefore, depends upon our judgment which we have just rendered in the case of Greene v. Owen, at this term. We have there held that, upon the resignation of John R. Miller and George W.

Winslow v. . Winslow

95 N.C. 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

Darden v. Simmons, 84 N. C., 555 . … Norfleet v. *28 Cromwell, 70 N. C., 634 ; Brown v. Keener, 74 N. C., 714 ; Pool v. Trexler, 76 N. C., 297 .

Hodge v. . R. R.

108 N.C. 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

This Court has power to make such substitution of parties in proper cases ( Grant v. Rogers , 94 N.C. 755 ; Wilson v. Pearson , 102 N.C. 290 ), provided the opposite party is put to no disadvantage. … Justices of Tyrrell v. Simmons , 48 N.C. 187 ; Grant v. Rogers, supra . The amendment cannot be allowed, because the law confers no right upon the County Board of Education of Wake to maintain the action.