Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.23s

  • State v. Brown

    352 N.C. 677 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2000

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    350 N.C. 101 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1999

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    351 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1999

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jimenez v. Brown

    350 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1999

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charns v. Brown

    349 N.C. 228 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1998

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tew v. Brown

    351 N.C. 371 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2000

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Featherstone

    202 N.C. 569 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1932

    In Hodges v. Wilson, 165 N. C., 323 , 81 S. … Brown, now holds.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Terry

    350 N.C. 307 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1999

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    347 N.C. 579 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1998

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hatcher

    268 N.C. 57 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 1966

    Lindley v. Frazier, 231 N.C. 44, 46-47 , 55 S.E. 2d 815, 816 . Accord, Johnson v. Sanders, 260 N.C. 291 , 132 S.E. 2d 582 ; Twiford v. Waterfield, 240 N.C. 582 , 83 S.E. 2d 548 . This case is analogous to Callahan v. … Hudson v. Lutz, 50 N.C. 217 ; Young v. Herman, 97 N.C. 280 .” Id. at 757-58, 24 S.E, at 542-43. Accord, Lindley v. Frazier, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Power Co.

    140 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1905

    As said in Boom Co. v. … Goodwin v. C. & W. Canal Co., 18 Ohio St., 169 ; Young v. Harrison, 17 Ga., 30 .

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Aydlett

    193 N.C. 832 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 23, 1927

    Brown, administratrix, as to the ownership of said notes is determined, which said controversy is now pending in the Superior Court of Pasquotank County. … between the parties, and that no harm can result from continuing the restraining order to the hearing, while a contrary ruling might work serious injury to the plaintiffs, we are of opinion that under authority of Wentz v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Flowe

    348 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 8, 1998

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    346 N.C. 284 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Parker

    347 N.C. 573 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1998

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Height

    347 N.C. 264 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Robinson

    345 N.C. 175 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    347 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Byrd

    252 N.C. 454 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1960

    See Entwistle v. Covington, 250 N.C. 315 , 108 S.E. 2d 603 ; Trust Co. v. Wolfe, 243 N.C. 469 , 91 S.E. 2d 246 ; S. c., 245 N.C. 535 , 96 S.E. 2d 690 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    346 N.C. 550 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.