Case law

Redding v. Vogt.

140 N.C. 562 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1906

Brown and wife (formerly Lizzie 0. Redding) to S. A. Redding, dated November 18, 1901. … Falls v. Carpenter, 21 N. C., 237 ; Faw v. Whittington, 72 N. C., 321 ; *568 Miller v. Pierce, 104 N. C., 389 ; Holden v. Purefoy, 108 N. C., 163 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 112 N. C., 27 ; Gorrell v. Alspaugh, 120 N.

Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Purdue

365 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 2011

709 S.E.2d 930 (2011) HEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and International Internet Technologies, LLC v. … Browning, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C. Michael A. Grace, Winston-Salem, for International Internet Technologies. Hal Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

State v. . Higgs

48 L.R.A. 446 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 1900

That among the powers conferred on the board of aldermen are these: . . . … Cited: Board of Education v. Henderson, ante , 691; S. v. Hill, post , 1142; S. v. Caldwell , 127 N.C. 521 ; Hester v. Traction Co. , 138 N.C. 293 ; S. v. Godwin , 145 N.C. 464 . Overruled: Small v.

Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Purdue

365 N.C. 206 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2011

710 S.E.2d 25 (2011) HEST TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and International Internet Technologies, LLC v. … Browning, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C., et al. Michael A. Grace, Winston-Salem, for International Internet Technologies, LLC. Hal Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C., et al.

Pineus v. Railroad

140 N.C. 450 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1906

Brown, J. … Daniel v. Railroad, 117 N.

Lane v. . Graham County

194 N.C. 723 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1927

That at a meeting of the board of commissioners of defendant, Graham County, held on 2 May, 1927, the defendant, Graham County, through its board of commissioners, passed an order empowering and directing the defendant, Riley … The principle is stated by Hohe, J., in Board of Health v. Comrs., 173 N.

Rouse v. WILLIAMS REALTY BLDG. CO., INC.

554 S.E.2d 337 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 2001

ROUSE, Sandy Rouse, and Federal Insurance Company, v. WILLIAMS REALTY BUILDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED. No. 263A01. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 9, 2001. Everett Gaskins Hancock & Stevens by E.D. … Brown, Crump, Vanore & Tierney, L.L.P. by Andrew A. Vanore, III, and Christopher G. Lewis, Raleigh, for cross-claim defendant-appellant Federal Insurance Company. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Kennedy v. . Wilkesboro

214 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1938

Questions involved in the litigation over the municipal offices in the town of Wilkesboro in 1935 were considered by this Court in Harris v. Miller , 208 N.C. 746 , 182 S.E. 663 ; Wilkesboro v. … Baker v. Hobgood , 126 N.C. 149 , 35 S.E. 253 ; Smith v. Carolina Beach , 206 N.C. 834 , 175 S.E. 313 . Judgment affirmed.

Peterson v. Ferrell.

127 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 1900

Cowand v. Meyers, 99 N. C., 198 ; Wright v. Brown, 116 N. C., 26 ; Douthett v. Bodenhamer, 57 N. C., 444 . … Braswell v. Morehead, 45 N. C., 26 ; Douthett v. Bodenhamer, supra; Gordon v. Lowther, 75 N. C., 198 ; Cowand v. Meyers, supra —where the question is discussed and settled. Affirmed.

In Re the Will of Crawford

246 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1957

Rudd v. Casualty Co., 202 N.C. 779 , 164 S.E. 345 ; Lumber Co. v. Elizabeth City, 181 N.C. 442 , 107 S.E. 449 ; Bag Co. v. Grocery Co., 171 N.C. 764 , 88 S.E. 512 ; Fisher v. Brown, 135 N.C. 198 , 47 S.E. 398 ; Brown v. … Ellis v. Wellons, 224 N.C. 269 , 29 S.E. 2d 884 ; Davis v. Keen, 142 N.C. 496 , 55 S.E. 359 ; Simmons v. Davenport, 140 N.C. 407 , 53 S.E. 225 .

Arnold v. Indemnity Fire Insurance

152 N.C. 232 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 31, 1910

App., 625 ; Western Insurance Co. v. Kemendo, 94 Tex., 367 ; Brown v. Palatine Ins. Co., 89 Tex., 590 ; Fire Assn. v. Short, 100 Ill. App., 553 ; Connecticut Ins. Co. v. … In Brown v.

Smith v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

174 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917

Brown, J. Plaintiff sues to recover for loss of goods shipped in interstate commerce. … Stewart v. Carpet Co., 138 N. C., 36 . As no motion to nonsuit appears in the record, there will be another trial. New trial.

Skinner v. Jernigan

250 N.C. 657 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1959

This Court said in Hunt v. … In Richardson v.

Bryant v. Poole

261 N.C. 553 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1964

Champion v. Board of Health, 221 N.C. 96 , 19 S.E. 2d 239 . … Champion v. Board of Health, supra. Defendant suggests an analogy between an award of the Industrial Commission and a judgment of a justice of the peace.

State v. Campbell

316 N.C. 168 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1986

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 587 (1984). Contradictions and discrepancies in the evidence are to be resolved by the jury. Id. … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 587 . “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Id.

Alexander v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

150 N.C. 536 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1909

Brown, J. The insured, Pearl Alexander, was a child about fifteen years of age, whose life was insured on 18 March, 1907, by defendant, for the benefit of plaintiff, her mother by adoption and great-aunt by blood. … Insurance Co. v. Fletcher, 117 U. S., 519 . Tbe ease at bar is governed by tbe principles laid down in Bryant v. Insurance Co., supra.

Eudy v. Eudy

288 N.C. 71 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1975

The same *79 evidence, properly pleaded, would also have supported a verdict and judgment for divorce from bed and board. … The essential issue of residence simply was not pleaded or tried in this case as is required to support a judgment for divorce from bed and board.

State Ex Rel. Phillips v. Slaughter

209 N.C. 543 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1936

DeLoatch v. Rogers, 86 N. C., 358 ; Hendersonville v. Jordan, 150 N. C., 35 . … Tea Co. v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 205 N. C., 313 ; Phifer v. Berry, 202 N. C., 388 . The demurrer presents this question of law: Is absentee voting permitted in municipal elections?

Godette v. . Gaskill

151 N.C. 52 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1909

Dunlap v. Glidden, 31 Me., 439; Phelps v. Stearns, 70 Mass., 106 ; Cunningham v. Brown, 18 Vt., 126 ; Bostwick v. Lewis, 2 Day (Conn.), 456; Smith v. Lewis, 3 Johns (N. Y.), 165, 169; Grove v. Brandenburg, 7 Blackf. … Taylor v. Bidwell, 65 Cal., 490 ; 1 Cyc., 687; 22 A. & E., 698. Rice v.

Turpin v. . Jarrett

226 N.C. 135 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1946

Matthews v. Matthews, supra; Harrell v. Hagan, supra; Bowden v. Lynch, 173 N. C., 203 , 91 S. E., 957 ; Albright v. Albright, 172 N. C., 351 , 90 S. E., 303 ; Pugh v. Allen, 179 N. C., 307 , 102 S. E., 394 ; Willis v. … Trust Co., supra; Hampton v. Griggs, supra; Moseley v. Knott, supra; Brown v. Holland, 221 N. C., 135 , 19 S. E. (2d), 255 ; Elledge v. Parrish, 224 N. C., 397 .